World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10107 9459 991 947 92 6176

Rob Jenkins publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rob Jenkins between 1961 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rob Jenkins published across 65 years, from 1961 to 2025, averaging 1.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2016. 6 of the 116 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1961 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2016. 1961: 1 publication 1962: 0 publications 1963: 2 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
1961 2025

116 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rob Jenkins: publications per year, 1961 to 2025
Year Publications
1961 1
1962 0
1963 2
1964 0
1965 1
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 3
2004 0
2005 5
2006 4
2007 8
2008 5
2009 6
2010 1
2011 5
2012 2
2013 3
2014 6
2015 8
2016 11
2017 7
2018 5
2019 7
2020 4
2021 5
2022 5
2023 4
2024 4
2025 2
Total 116
Download as CSV

Rob Jenkins publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rob Jenkins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 92 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 92
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rob Jenkins D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rob Jenkins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rob Jenkins is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on fields spanning neuroscience, psychology, and computer science. Within these areas, their work extensively covers cognitive neuroscience, computer vision and pattern recognition, as well as experimental and cognitive psychology. Additional subfields include social psychology and atomic and molecular physics and optics.

Their research topics center notably on face recognition and perception, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, and face recognition and analysis. They also explore aspects of the psychology of moral and emotional judgment, neural and behavioral psychology studies, visual attention and saliency detection, and visual perception and processing mechanisms.

Rob Jenkins has contributed to several publication venues. The most frequent outlets for their work include:

  • Cognition
  • PLoS ONE
  • Perception
  • Scientific Reports
  • Behavior Research Methods

Among their recent papers are:

  • "GFMT2: A psychometric measure of face matching ability" (2021), published in Behavior Research Methods
  • "Dunning-Kruger effects in face perception" (2020), published in Cognition
  • "Seeing through disguise: Getting to know you with a deep convolutional neural network" (2021), published in Cognition
  • "The Medusa effect reveals levels of mind perception in pictures" (2021), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Ingroup and outgroup differences in face detection" (2022), published in British Journal of Psychology

Frequent collaborators in their research include Jet G. Sanders, Xingchen Zhou, Jonathan E. Prunty, Rana Qarooni, and Markus Bindemann. These coauthors have appeared with Jenkins on multiple publications, reflecting a consistent cooperative network.

Best Publications

  • Variability in Photos of the Same Face.

    Rob Jenkins;David White;Xandra Van Montfort;A. Mike Burton

  • Neural Processing of Fearful Faces: Effects of Anxiety are Gated by Perceptual Capacity Limitations

    Sonia J. Bishop;Rob Jenkins;Andrew D. Lawrence

  • Robust Representations for Face Recognition: The Power of Averages

    A. Mike Burton;Rob Jenkins;Peter J.B. Hancock;David White

  • Passport officers' errors in face matching.

    David White;Richard I. Kemp;Rob Jenkins;Michael Matheson

  • Separate coding of different gaze directions in the superior temporal sulcus and inferior parietal lobule.

    Andrew J. Calder;John D. Beaver;Joel S. Winston;Ray J. Dolan

  • Identity From Variation: Representations of Faces Derived From Multiple Instances

    A. Mike Burton;A. Mike Burton;Robin S. S. Kramer;Robin S. S. Kramer;Kay L. Ritchie;Kay L. Ritchie;Rob Jenkins

  • Faces retain attention

    Markus Bindemann;A. Mike Burton;Ignace T. C. Hooge;Rob Jenkins

  • Mental representations of familiar faces.

    A. Mike Burton;Rob Jenkins;Stefan R. Schweinberger

  • Stable face representations

    Rob Jenkins;A. Mike Burton

  • I Thought You Were Looking at Me Direction-Specific Aftereffects in Gaze Perception

    Rob Jenkins;John D. Beaver;Andrew J. Calder

  • Face recognition by metropolitan police super-recognisers.

    David J. Robertson;Eilidh Noyes;Andrew J. Dowsett;Rob Jenkins

  • Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances.

    Sally Andrews;Rob Jenkins;Heather Cursiter;A. Mike Burton

  • Arguments Against a Configural Processing Account of Familiar Face Recognition.

    A. Mike Burton;A. Mike Burton;Stefan R. Schweinberger;Rob Jenkins;Jürgen M. Kaufmann

  • Visual representation of eye gaze is coded by a nonopponent multichannel system.

    Andrew J. Calder;Rob Jenkins;Anneli Cassel;Colin W. G. Clifford

  • Feedback training for facial image comparison

    David White;Richard I. Kemp;Rob Jenkins;A. Mike Burton

  • Capacity limits for face processing.

    Markus Bindemann;A. Mike Burton;Rob Jenkins

  • Ignoring famous faces: category-specific dilution of distractor interference.

    Rob Jenkins;Nilli Lavie;Jon Driver

  • Redesigning photo-ID to improve unfamiliar face matching performance.

    David White;A. Mike Burton;Rob Jenkins;Richard I. Kemp

  • Recognition memory for distractor faces depends on attentional load at exposure

    Rob Jenkins;Nilli Lavie;Jon Driver

  • How many faces do people know

    R. Jenkins;A. J. Dowsett;A. M. Burton

  • Separate coding of different gaze directions in the superior temporal sulcus.

    A.J. Calder;J.D. Beaver;J. Winston;R.J. Dolan

Frequent Co-Authors

A. Mike Burton
A. Mike Burton University of York
David White
David White University of New South Wales
Andrew W. Young
Andrew W. Young University of York
Timothy J. Andrews
Timothy J. Andrews University of York
Andrew J. Calder
Andrew J. Calder University of Cambridge
Markus Bindemann
Markus Bindemann University of Kent
Stefan R. Schweinberger
Stefan R. Schweinberger Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Sakiko Yoshikawa
Sakiko Yoshikawa Kyoto University
Andrew W. Ellis
Andrew W. Ellis University of York
Elizabeth Pellicano
Elizabeth Pellicano University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens up many career pathways, from clinical practice to research and counseling. With the rise of flexible learning, many students are considering online psychology degrees. These programs provide accessibility and convenience without compromising the quality of education.

One of the key concerns for psychology students is affordability. Choosing the right program can help minimize student debt while still advancing your career. If you are in California, you might want to start by reviewing affordable psychology programs in Los Angeles. For those in Kentucky, resources like the most affordable psychology degree programs in Louisville are valuable when comparing tuition and program options.

Students in the Midwest can benefit from exploring the cheapest psychology degrees in Minneapolis or reviewing affordable psychology programs in Missouri. By comparing costs and curriculum, you can find a program that matches both your budget and career goals, setting you up for success in fields like mental health, education, or business.

Best Scientists Citing Rob Jenkins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles