World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 35 7486 6929 586 559 206 6201

Anthony Sladen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anthony Sladen between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anthony Sladen published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2021. 25 of the 229 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2021. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 13 publications
2002 2025

229 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anthony Sladen: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 4
2006 6
2007 8
2008 7
2009 6
2010 13
2011 10
2012 5
2013 6
2014 10
2015 6
2016 13
2017 7
2018 15
2019 16
2020 9
2021 27
2022 17
2023 16
2024 12
2025 13
Total 229
Download as CSV

Anthony Sladen publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony Sladen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 198–207 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 206 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333 206
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Anthony Sladen D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony Sladen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372 35
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anthony Sladen is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant contributions in Engineering as well. Key subfields in which Sladen has published include Geophysics, Ocean Engineering, Oceanography, Artificial Intelligence, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The scientist's work covers several main topics:

  • Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • Earthquake and Tectonic Studies
  • Underwater Acoustics Research
  • Seismology and Earthquake Studies
  • Geophysics and Sensor Technology
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Anthony Sladen are:

  • Jean-Paul Ampuero
  • Diane Rivet
  • Martijn van den Ende
  • Itzhak Lior
  • Diego Mercerat

Prominent publication venues where Sladen has appeared multiple times include:

  • Geophysical Journal International
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Scientific Reports
  • Solid Earth

Recent papers authored by Anthony Sladen illustrate the range and focus of their research activity:

  • "On the Detection Capabilities of Underwater Distributed Acoustic Sensing," 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • "A Self-Supervised Deep Learning Approach for Blind Denoising and Waveform Coherence Enhancement in Distributed Acoustic Sensing Data," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
  • "Preliminary assessment of ship detection and trajectory evaluation using distributed acoustic sensing on an optical fiber telecom cable," 2021, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • "Magnitude estimation and ground motion prediction to harness fiber optic distributed acoustic sensing for earthquake early warning," 2023, Scientific Reports
  • "Strain to ground motion conversion of distributed acoustic sensing data for earthquake magnitude and stress drop determination," 2021, Solid Earth

Best Publications

  • The 2011 Magnitude 9.0 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake: Mosaicking the Megathrust from Seconds to Centuries

    Mark Simons;Sarah E. Minson;Anthony Sladen;Anthony Sladen;Francisco Ortega

  • Coseismic Slip and Afterslip of the Great Mw 9.15 Sumatra–Andaman Earthquake of 2004

    Mohamed Chlieh;Jean Philippe Avouac;Vala Hjorleifsdottir;Teh Ru Alex Song

  • Partial rupture of a locked patch of the Sumatra megathrust during the 2007 earthquake sequence

    A. Ozgun Konca;Jean Philippe Avouac;Anthony Sladen;Aron J. Meltzner

  • Distributed sensing of earthquakes and ocean-solid Earth interactions on seafloor telecom cables.

    A Sladen;D Rivet;J P Ampuero;L De Barros

  • Seismic and aseismic slip on the Central Peru megathrust

    Hugo Perfettini;Jean Philippe Avouac;Hernando Tavera;Andrew Kositsky

  • Superficial simplicity of the 2010 El Mayor-Cucapah earthquake of Baja California in Mexico

    Shengji Wei;Eric J Fielding;Sebastien Leprince;Anthony Sladen;Anthony Sladen

  • Complex rupture during the 12 January 2010 Haiti earthquake

    G. P. Hayes;R. W. Briggs;A. Sladen;E. J. Fielding

  • Coseismic and postseismic slip associated with the 2010 Maule Earthquake, Chile: Characterizing the Arauco Peninsula barrier effect

    Yu Nung Nina Lin;Anthony Sladen;Francisco Ortega-Culaciati;Mark Simons

  • Supercycle at the Ecuadorian subduction zone revealed after the 2016 Pedernales earthquake

    J.-M. Nocquet;P. Jarrin;M. Vallée;P. A. Mothes

  • Mega-earthquakes rupture flat megathrusts

    Quentin Bletery;Amanda M. Thomas;Alan W. Rempel;Leif Karlstrom

  • Kinematic fault slip evolution source models of the 2008 M7.9 Wenchuan earthquake in China from SAR interferometry, GPS and teleseismic analysis and implications for Longmen Shan tectonics

    Eric J. Fielding;Anthony Sladen;Zhenhong Li;Jean Philippe Avouac

  • On the Detection Capabilities of Underwater Distributed Acoustic Sensing

    Itzhak Lior;Anthony Sladen;Diane Rivet;Jean-Paul Ampuero

  • Source model of the 2007 Mw 8.0 Pisco, Peru earthquake: Implications for seismogenic behavior of subduction megathrusts

    A Sladen;Hernando Tavera;M Simons;J. P. Avouac

  • Bayesian inversion for finite fault earthquake source models – II: the 2011 great Tohoku-oki, Japan earthquake

    S. E. Minson;M. Simons;J. L. Beck;F. Ortega

  • Accounting for uncertain fault geometry in earthquake source inversions – I: theory and simplified application

    Théa Ragon;Anthony Sladen;Mark Simons

  • Discriminating the tectonic and non-tectonic contributions in the ionospheric signature of the 2011, M w 7.1, dip-slip Van earthquake, Eastern Turkey

    Lucie M. Rolland;Mathilde Vergnolle;Jean-Mathieu Nocquet;Anthony Sladen

  • A Self-Supervised Deep Learning Approach for Blind Denoising and Waveform Coherence Enhancement in Distributed Acoustic Sensing Data

    Unknown

  • A detailed source model for the Mw9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake reconciling geodesy, seismology, and tsunami records

    Quentin Bletery;Anthony Sladen;Bertrand Delouis;Martin Vallée

  • Preliminary assessment of ship detection and trajectory evaluation using distributed acoustic sensing on an optical fiber telecom cable

    Diane Rivet;Benoit de Cacqueray;Anthony Sladen;Aurélien Roques

  • Magnitude estimation and ground motion prediction to harness fiber optic distributed acoustic sensing for earthquake early warning

    Unknown

  • Strike-slip earthquakes can also be detected in the ionosphere,

    Elvira Astafyeva;Lucie M. Rolland;Anthony Sladen

  • High-resolution backprojection at regional distance: Application to the Haiti M7.0 earthquake and comparisons with finite source studies

    L. Meng;J.-P. Ampuero;A. Sladen;H. Rendon

  • Coseismic slip and afterslip of the great M-w 9.15 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 2004

    M Chlieh;J-P Avouac;Hjorleifsdottir;T-Ra Song

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Simons
Mark Simons California Institute of Technology
Jean-Paul Ampuero
Jean-Paul Ampuero Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Jean-Mathieu Nocquet
Jean-Mathieu Nocquet Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Eric J. Fielding
Eric J. Fielding Jet Propulsion Lab
Bertrand Delouis
Bertrand Delouis Université Côte d'Azur
Jean Philippe Avouac
Jean Philippe Avouac California Institute of Technology
Kerry E Sieh
Kerry E Sieh Nanyang Technological University
Danny H Natawidjaja
Danny H Natawidjaja National Research and Innovation Agency of the Republic of Indonesia
Martin Vallée
Martin Vallée Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Laurence Audin
Laurence Audin Institut de Recherche pour le Développement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can significantly broaden career opportunities in Earth Science and related fields. For those interested in visual documentation and analysis of natural environments, pursuing a bachelors in photography online can be a valuable complement. This path is especially useful for Earth scientists focusing on environmental monitoring, geology, or remote sensing using photographic techniques.

Veterans looking to advance their education will find tailored options such as the best military friendly online photography degrees. These programs accommodate unique scheduling needs and can help veterans develop skills that support careers in natural resource management or conservation efforts.

Additionally, combining Earth Science expertise with language skills can open doors in global environmental projects and research. Programs like the cheapest online spanish degree offer affordable pathways to gain proficiency in Spanish, enhancing communication in many international scientific contexts.

Veterans can also benefit from specialized support through online spanish degree programs for veterans, enabling them to build cross-cultural skills vital for diverse career pathways within the Earth Science field.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony Sladen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles