World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniela Palomba

Daniela Palomba

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10165 9515 228 224 114 5490

Daniela Palomba publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniela Palomba between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniela Palomba published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2017. 4 of the 140 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2017. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1982 2025

140 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniela Palomba: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 2
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 3
1997 2
1998 0
1999 1
2000 2
2001 0
2002 5
2003 3
2004 4
2005 4
2006 3
2007 2
2008 1
2009 2
2010 3
2011 11
2012 12
2013 9
2014 4
2015 9
2016 4
2017 15
2018 4
2019 2
2020 6
2021 3
2022 12
2023 3
2024 2
2025 2
Total 140
Download as CSV

Daniela Palomba publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela Palomba sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 114
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniela Palomba D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela Palomba sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniela Palomba is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on psychology and medicine, with notable contributions to cardiology, cognitive psychology, and clinical psychology.

Their work involves exploration in the following main fields of study:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine

Subfields covered in their research include:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology

Palomba's main research topics involve:

  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Simone Messerotti Benvenuti
  • Carola Dell'Acqua
  • Elisabetta Patron
  • Elisa Dal Bò
  • Claudio Gentili

Their papers have been published repeatedly in key venues such as:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Scientific Reports
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders Reports

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Palomba include:

  • Reduced heart rate variability is associated with vulnerability to depression, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
  • Blood pressure-related hypoalgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, Journal of Hypertension
  • EEG time-frequency analysis reveals blunted tendency to approach and increased processing of unpleasant stimuli in dysphoria, 2022, Scientific Reports
  • Multidimensional components of (state) mathematics anxiety: Behavioral, cognitive, emotional, and psychophysiological consequences, 2023, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  • Attention and affect in dysphoria: Insights from startle reflex modulation and cardiac deceleration, 2020, Behaviour Research and Therapy

Best Publications

  • Efficacy of Psychotherapies for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Ioana A. Cristea;Claudio Gentili;Carmen D. Cotet;Daniela Palomba

  • Visual evoked potentials, heart rate responses and memory to emotional pictorial stimuli

    Daniela Palomba;Alessandro Angrilli;Alessio Mini

  • Cardiac responses associated with affective processing of unpleasant film stimuli.

    Daniela Palomba;Michela Sarlo;Alessandro Angrilli;Alessio Mini

  • Startle reflex and emotion modulation impairment after a right amygdala lesion

    Alessandro Angrilli;Alessandra Mauri;Daniela Palomba;Herta Flor

  • Attentional resources measured by reaction times highlight differences within pleasant and unpleasant, high arousing stimuli.

    Giulia Buodo;Michela Sarlo;Daniela Palomba

  • Frontal alpha asymmetry neurofeedback for the reduction of negative affect and anxiety.

    Rocco Mennella;Elisabetta Patron;Daniela Palomba

  • Emotional Information Processing and Visual Evoked Brain Potentials

    Alessio Mini;Daniela Palomba;Alessandro Angrilli;Stefano Bravi

  • Emotional impairment after right orbitofrontal lesion in a patient without cognitive deficits.

    Alessandro Angrilli;Daniela Palomba;Anna Cantagallo;Alessandra Maietti

  • Changes in EEG alpha power to different disgust elicitors: the specificity of mutilations.

    Michela Sarlo;Giulia Buodo;Silvia Poli;Daniela Palomba

  • Health risk factors in caregivers of terminal cancer patients: a pilot study.

    Alice Corà;Manuela Partinico;Marianna Munafò;Daniela Palomba

  • Stimulus-Preceding Negativity and heart rate changes in anticipation of affective pictures

    Silvia Poli;Michela Sarlo;Marta Bortoletto;Giulia Buodo

  • Temporal dynamics of cognitive-emotional interplay in moral decision-making

    Michela Sarlo;Lorella Lotto;Andrea Manfrinati;Rino Rumiati

  • Cortical brain responses to semantic incongruity and syntactic violation in Italian language: an event-related potential study

    Alessandro Angrilli;Barbara Penolazzi;Francesco Vespignani;Marica De Vincenzi

  • Pavlovian conditioning of muscular responses in chronic pain patients: central and peripheral correlates

    Christoph Schneider;Daniela Palomba;Herta Flor

  • If it makes you feel bad, don't do it! Egoistic rather than altruistic empathy modulates neural and behavioral responses in moral dilemmas

    Michela Sarlo;Lorella Lotto;Rino Rumiati;Daniela Palomba

  • Baroreceptor cortical effects, emotions and pain

    Alessio Mini;Harald Rau;Pedro Montoya;Daniela Palomba

  • Blood phobia and spider phobia: two specific phobias with different autonomic cardiac modulations

    Michela Sarlo;Daniela Palomba;Alessandro Angrilli;Luciano Stegagno

  • Electrophysiological evidence of visual encoding deficits in a cross-modal attentional blink paradigm.

    R. Dell'acqua;P. Jolicoeur;F. Pesciarelli;R. Job

  • Blood pressure changes highlight gender differences in emotional reactivity to arousing pictures.

    Michela Sarlo;Daniela Palomba;Giulia Buodo;Rita Minghetti

  • Cardiovascular dynamics in blood phobia: evidence for a key role of sympathetic activity in vulnerability to syncope.

    Michela Sarlo;Giulia Buodo;Marianna Munafò;Luciano Stegagno

  • Health Risk Factors in Caregivers of Terminal Cancer Patients

    Alice Cora;Manuela Partinico;Daniela Palomba

Frequent Co-Authors

Michela Sarlo
Michela Sarlo University of Urbino
Alessandro Angrilli
Alessandro Angrilli University of Padua
Gaetano Valenza
Gaetano Valenza University of Pisa
Luigi Castelli
Luigi Castelli University of Padua
Marta Ghisi
Marta Ghisi University of Padua
Paolo Palatini
Paolo Palatini University of Padua
Remo Job
Remo Job University of Trento
Enzo Pasquale Scilingo
Enzo Pasquale Scilingo University of Pisa
Lucia Mason
Lucia Mason University of Padua
Herta Flor
Herta Flor Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Psychology in the USA, you might also consider related fields such as social work. These disciplines share many core concepts, and both offer strong career prospects in counseling, community engagement, and mental health services.

Today’s flexible learning options allow you to pursue your interests through online programs. For those focusing on regional opportunities, popular social work programs in North Carolina and top-ranked social work degree programs in Pittsburgh provide excellent choices for a local academic experience.

If you want an affordable path, look into the best value online bsw programs in Ohio or explore nationwide options with the best value online social work degrees in USA. These programs combine academic quality with financial accessibility.

Whether you choose psychology or social work, online degrees provide flexibility and broad career pathways—making it easier to balance studies and work as you prepare for rewarding roles in mental health, counseling, or social services.

Best Scientists Citing Daniela Palomba

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles