World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
51
Citations
16306
World Ranking
4636
National Ranking
1711

Susan C. Anenberg publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan C. Anenberg sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 179 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Susan C. Anenberg D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan C. Anenberg sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Susan C. Anenberg is affiliated with George Washington University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a significant emphasis on health, toxicology, and mutagenesis. Their work spans several subfields including global and planetary change, atmospheric science, environmental engineering, and sociology and political science.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • COVID-19 impact on air quality
  • Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Noise Effects and Management

They have published extensively, with frequent contributions to the following venues:

  • GeoHealth
  • ISEE Conference Abstracts
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Environmental Health Perspectives
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Susan C. Anenberg include:

  • Trends in urban air pollution over the last two decades: A global perspective, 2022, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Disentangling the Impact of the COVID-19 Lockdowns on Urban NO 2 From Natural Variability, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Synergistic health effects of air pollution, temperature, and pollen exposure: a systematic review of epidemiological evidence, 2020, Environmental Health
  • TROPOMI NO2 in the United States: A Detailed Look at the Annual Averages, Weekly Cycles, Effects of Temperature, and Correlation With Surface NO2 Concentrations, 2021, Earth's Future
  • Mortality Attributable to Ambient Air Pollution: A Review of Global Estimates, 2022, GeoHealth

They collaborate regularly with other researchers, including:

  • Daniel L. Goldberg
  • Gaige Hunter Kerr
  • Patrick L. Kinney
  • Michael Bräuer
  • Aaron van Donkelaar

Best Publications

  • Global burden and strength of evidence for 88 risk factors in 204 countries and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

    Unknown

  • Simultaneously Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change and Improving Human Health and Food Security

    Drew Shindell;Johan C. I. Kuylenstierna;Elisabetta Vignati;Rita van Dingenen

  • An estimate of the global burden of anthropogenic ozone and fine particulate matter on premature human mortality using atmospheric modeling.

    Susan C. Anenberg;Larry W. Horowitz;Daniel Q. Tong;J. Jason West

  • Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health

    J. Jason West;Steven J. Smith;Raquel A. Silva;Vaishali Naik

  • Impacts and mitigation of excess diesel-related NOx emissions in 11 major vehicle markets

    Susan C. Anenberg;Joshua Miller;Ray Minjares;Li Du

  • Estimating the National Public Health Burden Associated with Exposure to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone

    Neal Fann;Amy D. Lamson;Susan C. Anenberg;Karen Wesson

  • Global premature mortality due to anthropogenic outdoor air pollution and the contribution of past climate change

    Raquel A. Silva;J. Jason West;Yuqiang Zhang;Susan C. Anenberg

  • Global Air Quality and Health Co-Benefits of Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change through Methane and Black Carbon Emission Controls

    Susan C. Anenberg;Joel Schwartz;Drew Todd Shindell;Markus Amann

  • Trends in urban air pollution over the last two decades: A global perspective.

    Unknown

  • Global, national, and urban burdens of paediatric asthma incidence attributable to ambient NO2 pollution: estimates from global datasets

    Pattanun Achakulwisut;Michael Brauer;Perry W Hystad;Susan Casper Anenberg

  • Estimates of the Global Burden of Ambient PM2.5, Ozone, and NO2 on Asthma Incidence and Emergency Room Visits

    Susan Anenberg;Daven Henze;Veronica Tinney;Patrick Kinney

  • Updated Global Estimates of Respiratory Mortality in Adults ≥30Years of Age Attributable to Long-Term Ozone Exposure.

    Christopher S. Malley;Daven K. Henze;Johan C.I. Kuylenstierna;Harry W. Vallack

  • Future Fire Impacts on Smoke Concentrations, Visibility, and Health in the Contiguous United States.

    B. Ford;M. Val Martin;S. E. Zelasky;E. V. Fischer

  • Cleaner cooking solutions to achieve health, climate, and economic cobenefits.

    Susan Casper Anenberg;Susan Casper Anenberg;Kalpana Balakrishnan;James J. Jetter;Omar Masera

  • Disentangling the impact of the COVID-19 lockdowns on urban NO 2 from natural variability.

    Daniel L. Goldberg;Daniel L. Goldberg;Susan C. Anenberg;Debora Griffin;Chris A. McLinden

  • Climate, Health, Agricultural and Economic Impacts of Tighter Vehicle-Emission Standards

    Drew Shindell;Greg Faluvegi;Michael Walsh;Susan C. Anenberg;Susan C. Anenberg

  • Synergistic health effects of air pollution, temperature, and pollen exposure: a systematic review of epidemiological evidence

    Susan C. Anenberg;Shannon Haines;Shannon Haines;Elizabeth Wang;Nicholas Nassikas

  • Mortality Attributable to Ambient Air Pollution: A Review of Global Estimates

    Unknown

  • Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem

    J. Schmale;S. R. Arnold;Kathy S. Law;T. Thorp

  • TROPOMI NO2 in the United States: A Detailed Look at the Annual Averages, Weekly Cycles, Effects of Temperature, and Correlation With Surface NO2 Concentrations.

    Daniel L. Goldberg;Daniel L. Goldberg;Susan C. Anenberg;Gaige Hunter Kerr;Arash Mohegh

  • Intercontinental Impacts of Ozone Pollution on Human Mortality

    Susan Casper Anenberg;J. Jason West;Arlene M. Fiore;Daniel A. Jaffe

  • Particulate matter-attributable mortality and relationships with carbon dioxide in 250 urban areas worldwide.

    Susan C. Anenberg;Pattanun Achakulwisut;Pattanun Achakulwisut;Michael Brauer;Daniel Moran

  • The geographic distribution and economic value of climate change-related ozone health impacts in the United States in 2030.

    Neal Fann;Christopher G. Nolte;Patrick Dolwick;Tanya L. Spero

Frequent Co-Authors

J. Jason West
J. Jason West University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Daven K. Henze
Daven K. Henze University of Colorado Boulder
Michael Brauer
Michael Brauer University of British Columbia
Patrick L. Kinney
Patrick L. Kinney Boston University
Neal Fann
Neal Fann Environmental Protection Agency
Randall V. Martin
Randall V. Martin Washington University in St. Louis
Drew T. Shindell
Drew T. Shindell Duke University
Larry W. Horowitz
Larry W. Horowitz Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Jean-Francois Lamarque
Jean-Francois Lamarque National Center for Atmospheric Research
Zifeng Lu
Zifeng Lu Argonne National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can offer diverse career opportunities. Those new to higher education might consider the easiest bachelor's degree options to build foundational knowledge with flexibility, making the transition smoother.

Specializing further, an online geology degree provides in-depth understanding of Earth's processes, vital for careers in environmental consulting, resource management, and research.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental analysis. Pursuing one of the best GIS graduate programs equips students with skills in spatial data analysis, which are highly sought after in industries like urban planning, conservation, and disaster management.

For professionals aiming to influence policy and administration, completing one of the 1 year MPA programs offers a fast-track path to leadership roles within environmental agencies and nonprofit organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Susan C. Anenberg

Trending Scientists