World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
47
Citations
16764
World Ranking
3277
National Ranking
1582

Julene K. Johnson publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julene K. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 151 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Julene K. Johnson D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julene K. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julene K. Johnson is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields including Medicine, Psychology, and Health Professions, with a strong focus on subfields such as General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Health, and Clinical Psychology.

Their work frequently appears in several academic publication venues where they have multiple contributions, including Innovation in Aging, PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology, Alzheimer's & Dementia, and Circulation.

Johnson's research topics mainly cover areas such as Music Therapy and Health, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Health Disparities and Outcomes, Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes, Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Neuroscience and Music Perception, and Diverse Music Education Insights.

The following are some of their recent papers with year of publication and publication venue:

  • The Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Lived Experience of Diverse Older Adults Living Alone With Cognitive Impairment, 2020, The Gerontologist
  • Beneficial effects of choir singing on cognition and well-being of older adults: Evidence from a cross-sectional study, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Increasing engagement of Hispanics/Latinos in clinical trials on Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, 2022, Alzheimer's & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
  • Earning the Trust of African American Communities to Increase Representation in Dementia Research, 2020, Ethnicity & Disease
  • Communicating Awareness About COVID-19 Through Songs: An Example From Ghana, 2021, Frontiers in Public Health

Johnson has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, including Elena Portacolone, Sahru Keiser, Sheri L. Robb, Debra S. Burns, and Joke Bradt. These frequent collaborations reflect sustained partnerships in their research endeavors.

Best Publications

  • Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia.

    Katya Rascovsky;John R. Hodges;David Knopman;Mario F. Mendez

  • Cognition and Anatomy in Three Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia

    Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini;Nina F. Dronkers;Katherine P. Rankin;Jennifer M. Ogar

  • Cognitive, Emotional, and Social Benefits of Regular Musical Activities in Early Dementia: Randomized Controlled Study

    Teppo Särkämö;Mari Tervaniemi;Sari Laitinen;Ava Numminen

  • Distinctive neuropsychological patterns in frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, and Alzheimer disease.

    Joel H. Kramer;Jennifer Jurik;Sharon J. Sha;Kate P. Rankin

  • Frontotemporal dementia: clinicopathological correlations.

    Mark S. Forman;Jennifer Farmer;Julene K. Johnson;Christopher M. Clark

  • Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: demographic characteristics of 353 patients.

    Julene K. Johnson;Janine Diehl;Mario F. Mendez;John Neuhaus

  • Clinical and Pathological Evidence for a Frontal Variant of Alzheimer Disease

    Julene K. Johnson;Elizabeth Head;Ronald Kim;Arnold Starr

  • Executive Function, More Than Global Cognition, Predicts Functional Decline and Mortality in Elderly Women

    Julene K. Johnson;Li-Yung Lui;Kristine Yaffe

  • Comparison of family histories in FTLD subtypes and related tauopathies

    J. S. Goldman;J. M. Farmer;E. M. Wood;J. K. Johnson

  • Frontotemporal dementia progresses to death faster than Alzheimer disease

    E. D. Roberson;J. H. Hesse;K. D. Rose;H. Slama

  • Diagnostic criteria for the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD): Current limitations and future directions

    Katya Rascovsky;John R. Hodges;Christopher M. Kipps;Julene K. Johnson

  • Distinct MRI atrophy patterns in autopsy-proven Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration

    G.D. Rabinovici;W.W. Seeley;E.J. Kim;M.L. Gorno-Tempini

  • Cognitive and motor assessment in autopsy-proven corticobasal degeneration

    R. Murray;M. Neumann;M. S. Forman;J. Farmer

  • Oculomotor function in frontotemporal lobar degeneration, related disorders and Alzheimer's disease

    Siobhan Garbutt;Alisa Matlin;Joanna Hellmuth;Ana K. Schenk

  • Reporting standards for studies of diagnostic test accuracy in dementia: The STARDdem Initiative

    Anna H. Noel-Storr;Jenny M. McCleery;Edo Richard;Craig W. Ritchie

  • Multiple cognitive deficits in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

    Joel H. Kramer;Adam Nelson;Julene K. Johnson;Kristine Yaffe

  • Auditory event-related potentials during target detection are abnormal in mild cognitive impairment

    Edward J Golob;J.K Johnson;A Starr

  • Life experience and demographic influences on cognitive function in older adults.

    Paul W H Brewster;Rebecca J. Melrose;María J. Marquine;Julene K. Johnson

  • A Community Choir Intervention to Promote Well-Being Among Diverse Older Adults: Results From the Community of Voices Trial

    Julene K Johnson;Anita L Stewart;Michael Acree;Anna M Nápoles

  • Clinical-neuroimaging characteristics of dysexecutive mild cognitive impairment†

    Judy Pa;Adam Boxer;Linda L. Chao;Linda L. Chao;Adam Gazzaley

  • Neuropsychological and functional measures of severity in Alzheimer disease, frontotemporal dementia, and semantic dementia.

    Howard J. Rosen;Jenille M. Narvaez;Brad Hallam;Joel H. Kramer

  • Music recognition in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer disease.

    Julene K. Johnson;Chiung-Chih Chang;Simona Maria Brambati;Raffaella Migliaccio

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce L. Miller
Bruce L. Miller University of California, San Francisco
Joel H. Kramer
Joel H. Kramer University of California, San Francisco
Howard J. Rosen
Howard J. Rosen University of California, San Francisco
Kenneth E. Covinsky
Kenneth E. Covinsky University of California, San Francisco
Murray Grossman
Murray Grossman University of Pennsylvania
Carl W. Cotman
Carl W. Cotman University of California, Irvine
John Neuhaus
John Neuhaus University of California, San Francisco
Michael W. Weiner
Michael W. Weiner University of California, San Francisco
Linda L. Chao
Linda L. Chao University of California, San Francisco
Anita L. Stewart
Anita L. Stewart University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens a pathway to diverse and rewarding careers. With the growing need for accessible education, there is increasing interest in flexible online programs that allow students to accelerate their studies and enter the workforce quicker.

For those seeking rapid advancement, one year msw programs offer an option to quickly earn a Master of Social Work and start making a difference in social services. Alternatively, if you are interested in the study of behavior and the mind, the quickest psychology degree can help you fast-track your journey toward roles in counseling, research, or mental health support.

To ensure your credentials are recognized and respected, choosing cacrep accredited schools is crucial. These programs meet rigorous standards for counseling education and are often required for licensure. For those interested in family dynamics and relationship support, consider flexible online marriage and family therapy graduate programs that can open doors to specialized careers in therapy and family services.

Pursuing an online degree unlocks a wealth of opportunities, providing both quality education and the flexibility needed to balance your personal, professional, and academic goals.

Best Scientists Citing Julene K. Johnson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles