World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11677 10983 5984 5537 452 33611

John O.L. DeLancey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John O.L. DeLancey between 1986 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John O.L. DeLancey published across 41 years, from 1986 to 2026, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2010. 5 of the 444 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2010. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publication
1986 2026

444 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John O.L. DeLancey: publications per year, 1986 to 2026
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 7
1989 4
1990 6
1991 4
1992 3
1993 7
1994 11
1995 3
1996 6
1997 7
1998 7
1999 9
2000 8
2001 8
2002 5
2003 9
2004 16
2005 13
2006 15
2007 18
2008 16
2009 22
2010 28
2011 8
2012 24
2013 19
2014 15
2015 16
2016 13
2017 23
2018 19
2019 23
2020 12
2021 26
2022 1
2023 3
2024 4
2025 4
2026 1
Total 444
Download as CSV

John O.L. DeLancey publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John O.L. DeLancey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 452 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 452
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

John O.L. DeLancey D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John O.L. DeLancey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

John O.L. DeLancey is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States and has contributed to research primarily within the field of medicine. Their work focuses significantly on surgery and rheumatology, with additional studies in epidemiology, urology, and emergency medical services.

The scientist's research covers several core topics including pelvic floor disorders treatments, pelvic and acetabular injuries, anorectal disease treatments and outcomes, urinary tract infections management, urinary bladder and prostate research, hernia repair and management, as well as healthcare operations and scheduling optimization.

Frequently publishing in peer-reviewed journals, John O.L. DeLancey has appeared in venues such as:

  • International Urogynecology Journal
  • The Journal of Urology
  • The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
  • PLoS ONE
  • Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials

Recent papers co-authored by DeLancey include:

  • "An Examination of the Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing Nurse-Driven Protocols to Remove Indwelling Urinary Catheters in Acute Care Hospitals" (2020), published in The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
  • "Variations in structural support site failure patterns by prolapse size on stress 3D MRI" (2023), published in International Urogynecology Journal
  • "Subtyping of common complex diseases and disorders by integrating heterogeneous data. Identifying clusters among women with lower urinary tract symptoms in the LURN study" (2022), published in PLoS ONE
  • "Comparison of in vivo visco-hyperelastic properties of uterine suspensory tissue in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse" (2022), published in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials/Journal of mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
  • "Concerns and frustrations about the public reporting of device-related healthcare-associated infections: Perspectives of hospital leaders and staff" (2022), published in American Journal of Infection Control

John O.L. DeLancey has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • James A. Ashton-Miller
  • Alice A. Gaughan
  • Sarah R. MacEwan
  • Ann Scheck McAlearney
  • Christopher X. Hong

The scientist's contributions have been recognized by their election as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 2012.

Best Publications

  • The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction

    Richard C. Bump;Anders Mattiasson;Kari Bø;Linda P. Brubaker

  • Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: The hammock hypothesis

    John O.L. DeLancey

  • Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy.

    John O.L. DeLancey

  • Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse

    John O. L. DeLancey;Daniel M. Morgan;Dee E. Fenner;Rohna Kearney

  • The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery.

    John O. L. DeLancey;Rohna Kearney;Queena Chou;Steven Speights

  • Functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor.

    James A. Ashton-Miller;John O. L. DeLANCEY

  • Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth.

    Rohna Kearney;Janis M. Miller;James A. Ashton-Miller;John O.L. DeLancey

  • Levator ani muscle stretch induced by simulated vaginal birth.

    Kuo Cheng Lien;Brian Mooney;John O.L. DeLancey;James A. Ashton-Miller

  • The hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment.

    John O.L. DeLancey

  • Sacrospinous ligament fixation for eversion of the vagina

    George W. Morley;John O.L. DeLancey

  • Effect of Pelvic Muscle Exercise on Transient Incontinence During Pregnancy and After Birth

    C.M. Sampselle;J.M. Miller;B.L. Mims;J.O.L. Delancey

  • Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States.

    Dee E Fenner;Becky Genberg;Pavna Brahma;Lorri Marek

  • Anatomy and biomechanics of genital prolapse.

    John O. L. DeLANCEY

  • On the Biomechanics of Vaginal Birth and Common Sequelae

    James A. Ashton-Miller;John O.L. DeLancey

  • The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support

    Aimee Summers;Lisa A. Winkel;Hero K. Hussain;John O.L. DeLancey

  • Stress Urinary Incontinence: Relative Importance of Urethral Support and Urethral Closure Pressure

    John O.L. DeLancey;Elisa R. Trowbridge;Janis M. Miller;Daniel M. Morgan

  • Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele.

    John O.L. DeLancey

  • Structural aspects of the extrinsic continence mechanism.

    John O L deLancey

  • Size of the urogenital hiatus in the levator ani muscles in normal women and women with pelvic organ prolapse.

    John O.L. Delancey;William W. Hurd

  • Graphic integration of causal factors of pelvic floor disorders: an integrated life span model.

    John O.L. DeLancey;Lisa Kane Low;Janis M. Miller;Divya A. Patel

Frequent Co-Authors

James A. Ashton-Miller
James A. Ashton-Miller University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Edward J. McGuire
Edward J. McGuire University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John T. Wei
John T. Wei University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rodney L. Dunn
Rodney L. Dunn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Brenda W. Gillespie
Brenda W. Gillespie University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David Cella
David Cella Northwestern University
Holly E. Richter
Holly E. Richter University of Alabama at Birmingham
James W. Griffith
James W. Griffith Northwestern University
Martin R. Prince
Martin R. Prince Cornell University
Josef M. Miller
Josef M. Miller University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and related online medical degrees can open diverse pathways in healthcare. Students interested in the administrative side of health services may consider a health care administration online degree, which prepares graduates for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and other organizations. This degree emphasizes management, finance, and policy skills that are increasingly in demand.

For those seeking advanced leadership and specialized knowledge, a Master's in Healthcare Administration (MHA) is a popular route. Understanding the mha degree cost is crucial, as tuition rates can vary significantly between universities and programs. Many online offerings allow for flexible and affordable study options.

If clinical practice is your focus, pursuing the cheapest dnp program can help nurses advance into top roles with a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree. Similarly, prospective pharmacists can now enroll in accredited pharm d online programs designed for working professionals. These programs make it easier than ever to further your healthcare career with the flexibility of online learning.

Best Scientists Citing John O.L. DeLancey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles