World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
35010
World Ranking
12536
National Ranking
1179

Linda Cardozo publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Cardozo sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 679 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Linda Cardozo D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Cardozo sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Linda Cardozo is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Rheumatology, Urology, Surgery, Epidemiology, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

Their research covers a range of topics, notably in the areas of pelvic floor disorders treatments, urinary bladder and prostate research, urinary tract infections management, menopause health impacts and treatments, anorectal disease treatments and outcomes, urological disorders and treatments, and sexual function and dysfunction studies.

Frequent publication venues for their work include Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature, Neurourology and Urodynamics, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, and the International Urogynecology Journal.

Key coauthors in their collaborative work consist of Dudley Robinson, George Araklitis, Georgina Baines, Ana Sofia Da Silva, and Philip Toozs-Hobson.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Linda Cardozo span from 2020 to 2023, highlighting current and evolving research:

  • Cognitive Effects of Anticholinergic Load in Women with Overactive Bladder (2020) in Clinical Interventions in Aging
  • Current and Emerging Pharmacological Targets and Treatments of Urinary Incontinence and Related Disorders (2023) in Pharmacological Reviews
  • Vaginal erbium laser treatment for stress urinary incontinence: A multicenter randomized sham-controlled clinical trial (2023) in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
  • Rare and Complex Urology: Clinical Overview of ERN eUROGEN (2021) in European Urology
  • Modern management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (2021) in Faculty Reviews

Best Publications

  • The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

    Paul Abrams;Linda Cardozo;Magnus Fall;Derek Griffiths

  • How widespread are the symptoms of an overactive bladder and how are they managed? A population-based prevalence study.

    I. Milsom;P. Abrams;L. Cardozo;R.G. Roberts

  • A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women

    C. J. Kelleher;L. D. Cardozo;V. Khullar;S. Salvatore

  • 6th International Consultation on Incontinence. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and faecal incontinence

    Paul Abrams;Karl Erik Andersson;Apostolos Apostolidis;Lori Birder

  • Meta-analysis of estrogen therapy in the management of urogenital atrophy in postmenopausal women: second report of the Hormones and Urogenital Therapy Committee.

    Linda Cardozo;Gloria Bachmann;Donna McClish;David Fonda

  • Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse

    Sushma Srikrishna;Dudley Robinson;Linda Cardozo

  • Sacral anterior root stimulators for bladder control in paraplegia: the first 50 cases.

    G S Brindley;C E Polkey;D N Rushton;L Cardozo

  • RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO CONTROLLED TRIAL OF THE ONCE DAILY ANTIMUSCARINIC AGENT SOLIFENACIN SUCCINATE IN PATIENTS WITH OVERACTIVE BLADDER

    L. Cardozo;M. Lisec;R. Millard;O. van Vierssen Trip

  • Impact of overactive bladder symptoms on employment, social interactions and emotional well-being in six European countries

    Debra E. Irwin;Ian Milsom;Zoe Kopp;Paul Abrams

  • Reviewing the ICS 2002 terminology report: The ongoing debate

    Paul Abrams;Walter Artibani;Linda Cardozo;Roger Dmochowski

  • A Medium Term Analysis of the Subjective Efficacy of Treatment for Women with Detrusor Instability and Low Bladder Compliance

    C.J. Kelleher;L.D. Cardozo;V. Khullar;S. Salvatore

  • Overactive bladder symptoms: do we need urodynamics?

    G. Alessandro Digesu;Vik Khullar;Linda Cardozo;Stefano Salvatore

  • Persistence and adherence in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome with anticholinergic therapy: a systematic review of the literature.

    C. C. Sexton;S. M. Notte;C. Maroulis;R. R. Dmochowski

  • The role of estrogens in female lower urinary tract dysfunction.

    Dudley Robinson;Linda D Cardozo

  • Mirabegron in overactive bladder: A review of efficacy, safety, and tolerability

    Christopher R. Chapple;Linda Cardozo;Victor W. Nitti;Emad Siddiqui

  • P-QOL: a validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse

    G. Alessandro Digesu;Vik Khullar;Linda Cardozo;Dudley Robinson

  • A Comprehensive Review of Overactive Bladder Pathophysiology: On the Way to Tailored Treatment.

    Benoit Peyronnet;Emma Mironska;Christopher Chapple;Linda Cardozo

  • Systematic review and economic modelling of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of non-surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence

    M Imamura;P Abrams;C Bain;B Buckley

  • Urinary incontinence in middle aged women: childhood enuresis and other lifetime risk factors in a British prospective cohort.

    Diana Kuh;Linda Cardozo;Rebecca Hardy

  • The role of urinary urgency and its measurement in the overactive bladder symptom syndrome: current concepts and future prospects

    Christopher R. Chapple;Walter Artibani;Linda D. Cardozo;David Castro-Diaz

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher R. Chapple
Christopher R. Chapple Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Paul Abrams
Paul Abrams Southmead Hospital
Alan J. Wein
Alan J. Wein University of Pennsylvania
Roger R. Dmochowski
Roger R. Dmochowski Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Ian Milsom
Ian Milsom University of Gothenburg
Dirk De Ridder
Dirk De Ridder University of Otago
Derek Abbott
Derek Abbott University of Adelaide
Diana Kuh
Diana Kuh University College London
Karl-Erik Andersson
Karl-Erik Andersson Lund University
Graham J. Burton
Graham J. Burton University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in the medical field but want alternative or flexible study options, there are numerous online degrees that can jumpstart or advance your healthcare career. With rising demand for skilled professionals, especially nurses and nurse practitioners, affordable online programs offer a valuable pathway to achieve your goals.

Many students begin their journey with an associate degree in nursing and then advance their qualifications. If you are a registered nurse looking to obtain a bachelor’s degree, exploring rn to bsn online programs can be both cost-effective and convenient. For those seeking a faster route to becoming a nurse, the cheapest online accelerated bsn programs are available to help you quickly enter the workforce.

Advanced practice roles are also accessible online. The cheapest np programs online can prepare you for high-demand specialties and greater responsibility. For those interested in research or academic careers, consider exploring online phd programs in nursing to reach the top of your field.

These flexible pathways make a medical education more accessible, helping you tailor your journey while balancing work or other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Linda Cardozo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles