World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 89 12536 11795 1179 1129 679 35010

Linda Cardozo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda Cardozo between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda Cardozo published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 13.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2020. 4 of the 692 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2020. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 6 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 9 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 7 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 14 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 20 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 23 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 27 publications 2007: 33 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 27 publications 2010: 34 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 41 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1976 2025

692 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda Cardozo: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 5
1979 6
1980 3
1981 1
1982 6
1983 3
1984 9
1985 1
1986 7
1987 2
1988 6
1989 2
1990 9
1991 11
1992 14
1993 7
1994 7
1995 6
1996 10
1997 11
1998 20
1999 12
2000 15
2001 23
2002 14
2003 18
2004 16
2005 21
2006 27
2007 33
2008 27
2009 27
2010 34
2011 18
2012 19
2013 24
2014 30
2015 18
2016 17
2017 28
2018 22
2019 13
2020 41
2021 23
2022 5
2023 16
2024 3
2025 1
Total 692
Download as CSV

Linda Cardozo publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Cardozo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 661–680 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 679 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340 679
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda Cardozo D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Cardozo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 89
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Linda Cardozo is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Rheumatology, Urology, Surgery, Epidemiology, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

Their research covers a range of topics, notably in the areas of pelvic floor disorders treatments, urinary bladder and prostate research, urinary tract infections management, menopause health impacts and treatments, anorectal disease treatments and outcomes, urological disorders and treatments, and sexual function and dysfunction studies.

Frequent publication venues for their work include Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature, Neurourology and Urodynamics, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, and the International Urogynecology Journal.

Key coauthors in their collaborative work consist of Dudley Robinson, George Araklitis, Georgina Baines, Ana Sofia Da Silva, and Philip Toozs-Hobson.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Linda Cardozo span from 2020 to 2023, highlighting current and evolving research:

  • Cognitive Effects of Anticholinergic Load in Women with Overactive Bladder (2020) in Clinical Interventions in Aging
  • Current and Emerging Pharmacological Targets and Treatments of Urinary Incontinence and Related Disorders (2023) in Pharmacological Reviews
  • Vaginal erbium laser treatment for stress urinary incontinence: A multicenter randomized sham-controlled clinical trial (2023) in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
  • Rare and Complex Urology: Clinical Overview of ERN eUROGEN (2021) in European Urology
  • Modern management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (2021) in Faculty Reviews

Best Publications

  • The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

    Paul Abrams;Linda Cardozo;Magnus Fall;Derek Griffiths

  • How widespread are the symptoms of an overactive bladder and how are they managed? A population-based prevalence study.

    I. Milsom;P. Abrams;L. Cardozo;R.G. Roberts

  • A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women

    C. J. Kelleher;L. D. Cardozo;V. Khullar;S. Salvatore

  • 6th International Consultation on Incontinence. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and faecal incontinence

    Paul Abrams;Karl Erik Andersson;Apostolos Apostolidis;Lori Birder

  • Meta-analysis of estrogen therapy in the management of urogenital atrophy in postmenopausal women: second report of the Hormones and Urogenital Therapy Committee.

    Linda Cardozo;Gloria Bachmann;Donna McClish;David Fonda

  • Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse

    Sushma Srikrishna;Dudley Robinson;Linda Cardozo

  • Sacral anterior root stimulators for bladder control in paraplegia: the first 50 cases.

    G S Brindley;C E Polkey;D N Rushton;L Cardozo

  • RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO CONTROLLED TRIAL OF THE ONCE DAILY ANTIMUSCARINIC AGENT SOLIFENACIN SUCCINATE IN PATIENTS WITH OVERACTIVE BLADDER

    L. Cardozo;M. Lisec;R. Millard;O. van Vierssen Trip

  • Impact of overactive bladder symptoms on employment, social interactions and emotional well-being in six European countries

    Debra E. Irwin;Ian Milsom;Zoe Kopp;Paul Abrams

  • Reviewing the ICS 2002 terminology report: The ongoing debate

    Paul Abrams;Walter Artibani;Linda Cardozo;Roger Dmochowski

  • A Medium Term Analysis of the Subjective Efficacy of Treatment for Women with Detrusor Instability and Low Bladder Compliance

    C.J. Kelleher;L.D. Cardozo;V. Khullar;S. Salvatore

  • Overactive bladder symptoms: do we need urodynamics?

    G. Alessandro Digesu;Vik Khullar;Linda Cardozo;Stefano Salvatore

  • Persistence and adherence in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome with anticholinergic therapy: a systematic review of the literature.

    C. C. Sexton;S. M. Notte;C. Maroulis;R. R. Dmochowski

  • The role of estrogens in female lower urinary tract dysfunction.

    Dudley Robinson;Linda D Cardozo

  • Mirabegron in overactive bladder: A review of efficacy, safety, and tolerability

    Christopher R. Chapple;Linda Cardozo;Victor W. Nitti;Emad Siddiqui

  • P-QOL: a validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse

    G. Alessandro Digesu;Vik Khullar;Linda Cardozo;Dudley Robinson

  • A Comprehensive Review of Overactive Bladder Pathophysiology: On the Way to Tailored Treatment.

    Benoit Peyronnet;Emma Mironska;Christopher Chapple;Linda Cardozo

  • Systematic review and economic modelling of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of non-surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence

    M Imamura;P Abrams;C Bain;B Buckley

  • Urinary incontinence in middle aged women: childhood enuresis and other lifetime risk factors in a British prospective cohort.

    Diana Kuh;Linda Cardozo;Rebecca Hardy

  • The role of urinary urgency and its measurement in the overactive bladder symptom syndrome: current concepts and future prospects

    Christopher R. Chapple;Walter Artibani;Linda D. Cardozo;David Castro-Diaz

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher R. Chapple
Christopher R. Chapple Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Paul Abrams
Paul Abrams Southmead Hospital
Alan J. Wein
Alan J. Wein University of Pennsylvania
Roger R. Dmochowski
Roger R. Dmochowski Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Ian Milsom
Ian Milsom University of Gothenburg
Dirk De Ridder
Dirk De Ridder University of Otago
Derek Abbott
Derek Abbott University of Adelaide
Diana Kuh
Diana Kuh University College London
Karl-Erik Andersson
Karl-Erik Andersson Lund University
Graham J. Burton
Graham J. Burton University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in the medical field but want alternative or flexible study options, there are numerous online degrees that can jumpstart or advance your healthcare career. With rising demand for skilled professionals, especially nurses and nurse practitioners, affordable online programs offer a valuable pathway to achieve your goals.

Many students begin their journey with an associate degree in nursing and then advance their qualifications. If you are a registered nurse looking to obtain a bachelor’s degree, exploring rn to bsn online programs can be both cost-effective and convenient. For those seeking a faster route to becoming a nurse, the cheapest online accelerated bsn programs are available to help you quickly enter the workforce.

Advanced practice roles are also accessible online. The cheapest np programs online can prepare you for high-demand specialties and greater responsibility. For those interested in research or academic careers, consider exploring online phd programs in nursing to reach the top of your field.

These flexible pathways make a medical education more accessible, helping you tailor your journey while balancing work or other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Linda Cardozo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles