World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
109
Citations
85698
World Ranking
5647
National Ranking
3039

Alan J. Wein publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan J. Wein sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,742 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Alan J. Wein D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan J. Wein sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alan J. Wein is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a specific focus on Urology, Rheumatology, Surgery, Epidemiology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work heavily concentrates on several key topics, including:

  • Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Urinary Tract Infections Management
  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Research contributions have been published extensively in a number of venues, with notable frequency in:

  • Neurourology and Urodynamics
  • The Journal of Urology
  • Urology
  • Continence
  • Medicina

Recent publications related to the broader spectrum of medical and urological research include:

  • "Foundational Statistical Principles in Medical Research: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value" (2021, Medicina)
  • "Blinding in Clinical Trials: Seeing the Big Picture" (2021, Medicina)
  • "Current and Emerging Pharmacological Targets and Treatments of Urinary Incontinence and Related Disorders" (2023, Pharmacological Reviews)
  • "Are oxidative stress and ischemia significant causes of bladder damage leading to lower urinary tract dysfunction? Report from the ICI-RS 2019" (2020, Neurourology and Urodynamics)
  • "Purine nucleoside phosphorylase inhibition ameliorates age-associated lower urinary tract dysfunctions" (2020, JCI Insight)

Throughout their career, Alan J. Wein has collaborated frequently with a range of co-authors, including:

  • Paul Abrams
  • Thomas F. Monaghan
  • Karel Everaert
  • Jeffrey P. Weiss
  • Roger R. Dmochowski

Best Publications

  • The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

    Paul Abrams;Linda Cardozo;Magnus Fall;Derek Griffiths

  • Biochemical Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, or Interstitial Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

    A.V. D'Amico;R. Whittington;S.B. Malkowicz;D. Schultz

  • The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

    Paul Abrams;Linda Cardozo;Magnus Fall;Derek Griffiths

  • Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States

    W F Stewart;J B Van Rooyen;G W Cundiff;P Abrams

  • How widespread are the symptoms of an overactive bladder and how are they managed? A population-based prevalence study.

    I. Milsom;P. Abrams;L. Cardozo;R.G. Roberts

  • 6th International Consultation on Incontinence. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and faecal incontinence

    Paul Abrams;Karl Erik Andersson;Apostolos Apostolidis;Lori Birder

  • Summary of the National Institute of Arthritis, Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop on Interstitial Cystitis, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, August 28-29, 1987

    Jay Y. Gillenwater;Alan J. Wein

  • The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in the USA, the UK and Sweden: results from the Epidemiology of LUTS (EpiLUTS) study.

    Karin S. Coyne;Chris C. Sexton;Christine L. Thompson;Ian Milsom

  • Muscarinic receptors: their distribution and function in body systems, and the implications for treating overactive bladder

    Paul Abrams;Karl Erik Andersson;Jerry J. Buccafusco;Christopher Chapple

  • Tolterodine once-daily: superior efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of the overactive bladder.

    Philip Van Kerrebroeck;Karl Kreder;Udo Jonas;Norm Zinner

  • Pharmacology of the Lower Urinary Tract: Basis for Current and Future Treatments of Urinary Incontinence

    Karl-Erik Andersson;Alan J Wein

  • The burden of lower urinary tract symptoms: evaluating the effect of LUTS on health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression: EpiLUTS.

    Karin S. Coyne;Alan J. Wein;Andrea Tubaro;Chris C. Sexton

  • A Multivariate Analysis of Clinical and Pathological Factors that Predict for Prostate Specific Antigen Failure after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer

    Anthony V. D'Amico;Richard Whittington;S. Bruce Malkowicz;Delray Schultz

  • Pretreatment Nomogram for Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy or External-Beam Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

    Anthony V. D'Amico;Richard Whittington;S. Bruce Malkowicz;Julie Fondurulia

  • Re: FDA Safety Communication: Update on Serious Complications Associated With Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

    Alan J. Wein

  • Global Prevalence and Economic Burden of Urgency Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review

    Ian Milsom;Karin S. Coyne;Sean Nicholson;Marion Kvasz

  • Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era.

    Anthony V. D'Amico;Richard Whittington;S. Bruce Malkowicz;Kerri Cote

  • Detrusor Underactivity and the Underactive Bladder: A New Clinical Entity? A Review of Current Terminology, Definitions, Epidemiology, Aetiology, and Diagnosis

    Nadir I. Osman;Christopher R. Chapple;Paul Abrams;Roger Dmochowski

  • Prognostic value of urodynamic testing in myelodysplastic patients. Commentary

    Edward J. Mcguire;Jeffrey R. Woodside;Thomas A. Borden;Robert M. Weiss

  • Effects of estrogen with and without progestin on urinary incontinence

    Alan J. Wein

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert M. Levin
Robert M. Levin Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences
John E. Tomaszewski
John E. Tomaszewski University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Anthony V. D'Amico
Anthony V. D'Amico Brigham and Women's Hospital
Paul Abrams
Paul Abrams Southmead Hospital
Roger R. Dmochowski
Roger R. Dmochowski Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Christopher R. Chapple
Christopher R. Chapple Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Linda Cardozo
Linda Cardozo University of Cambridge
David M. Jacobowitz
David M. Jacobowitz National Institutes of Health
Michael C. Soulen
Michael C. Soulen University of Pennsylvania
Karl-Erik Andersson
Karl-Erik Andersson Lund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical education in the USA offers a wide range of options beyond traditional MD programs. For non-nurses seeking a fast track to advanced nursing roles, online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses provide an accelerated pathway without requiring a prior nursing background.

Admission competitiveness varies greatly between institutions. Students looking to start their nursing career quickly might consider nursing programs with high acceptance rates, which can increase the chances of beginning their education sooner.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, several online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa open doors to in-demand, flexible career opportunities with the benefit of financial aid options.

Additionally, if standardized testing is a barrier, prospective students will find a selection of lpn school without teas test requirements, making it easier to take the first steps into the nursing profession.

These diverse online programs and alternative pathways offer practical solutions to common challenges, allowing more students to join the healthcare workforce in roles that fit their goals and circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Alan J. Wein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles