World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 98 792 745 398 371 219 63933

Stanley Fields publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stanley Fields between 1978 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stanley Fields published across 49 years, from 1978 to 2026, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2005. 5 of the 240 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2005. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 8 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 6 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 2 publications
1978 2026

240 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stanley Fields: publications per year, 1978 to 2026
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 1
1981 8
1982 2
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 1
1989 2
1990 4
1991 3
1992 1
1993 6
1994 3
1995 3
1996 3
1997 6
1998 2
1999 7
2000 8
2001 11
2002 11
2003 8
2004 4
2005 14
2006 9
2007 4
2008 5
2009 3
2010 8
2011 9
2012 8
2013 8
2014 7
2015 12
2016 7
2017 4
2018 9
2019 3
2020 5
2021 6
2022 7
2023 5
2024 5
2025 3
2026 2
Total 240
Download as CSV

Stanley Fields publications per year - data summary

  • Stanley Fields, a Genetics scholar from University of Washington, has 240 publications recorded across 49 years, from 1978 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1978 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2005, with 14 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1978, 1980, 1985, 1987 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 4 of the 49 years in the span carry no publications at all (1979, 1983, 1984 and 1986).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.3 per year counting only the 45 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 22 publications, 9% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1978-1994: 34 publications (2.0 per year); 1995-2011: 115 publications (6.8 per year); 2012-2026: 91 publications (6.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Stanley Fields publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley Fields sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 215–224 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 219 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134 219
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Stanley Fields publication distribution in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 67 ranges running from 45–54 to 703+ publications.
  • Stanley Fields, a Genetics scholar from University of Washington, records 219 publications - the 57th percentile of the discipline.
  • 57% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Stanley Fields, and about 43% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 195–204 publications range, and Stanley Fields ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 125–134 publications, holding 217 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 56% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 205–214 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 703 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Stanley Fields D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley Fields sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60 98
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Stanley Fields D-index placement in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 40–41 to 160+ D-Index.
  • Stanley Fields, a Genetics scholar from University of Washington, records 98 D-Index - the 82nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 82% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Stanley Fields, and about 18% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 70–71 D-Index range, and Stanley Fields ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62–63 D-Index, holding 191 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 51% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 70–71 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2000 - Promega Biotechnology Research Award, American Society for Microbiology
  • 2000 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1997 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Stanley Fields is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily falls under the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to molecular biology, plant science, genetics, ecology, and biotechnology.

Their scholarly output includes work focused on several main topics, such as RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, plant virus research studies, RNA research and splicing, plant molecular biology research, RNA modifications and cancer, CRISPR and genetic engineering, as well as bacterial genetics and biotechnology.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Dimensionality reduction by UMAP to visualize physical and genetic interactions, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Synthetic promoter designs enabled by a comprehensive analysis of plant core promoters, 2021, Nature Plants
  • The regulatory landscape of Arabidopsis thaliana roots at single-cell resolution, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Identification of Plant Enhancers and Their Constituent Elements by STARR-seq in Tobacco Leaves, 2020, The Plant Cell
  • MaveRegistry: a collaboration platform for multiplexed assays of variant effect, 2021, Bioinformatics

Frequent coauthors in their research include Josh T. Cuperus, Christine Queitsch, Tobias Jores, Jackson Tonnies, and Michael W. Dorrity.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • The Plant Cell
  • Nature Plants
  • Bioinformatics

Their contributions to the academic community have been recognized through several awards including:

  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2015
  • Promega Biotechnology Research Award, American Society for Microbiology, 2000
  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences, 2000
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1997

Best Publications

  • A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions.

    Stanley Fields;Ok-kyu Song

  • A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Peter Uetz;Loic Giot;Gerard Cagney;Traci A. Mansfield

  • Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions.

    Christian von Mering;Roland Krause;Berend Snel;Michael Cornell

  • The two-hybrid system: a method to identify and clone genes for proteins that interact with a protein of interest.

    Cheng-Ting Chien;Paul L. Bartel;Rolf Sternglanz;Stanley Fields

  • A NETWORK OF PROTEIN?PROTEIN INTERACTIONS IN YEAST

    Benno Schwikowski;Peter Uetz;Stanley Fields

  • Regulation of Yeast Replicative Life Span by TOR and Sch9 in Response to Nutrients

    Matt Kaeberlein;R. Wilson Powers;Kristan K. Steffen;Eric A. Westman

  • Protein-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis.

    E M Phizicky;S Fields

  • Presence of a potent transcription activating sequence in the p53 protein.

    Stanley Fields;Sung Key Jang

  • A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome

    Zhijun Duan;Mirela Andronescu;Kevin Schutz;Sean McIlwain

  • Extension of chronological life span in yeast by decreased TOR pathway signaling

    R. Wilson Powers;Matt Kaeberlein;Seth D. Caldwell;Brian K. Kennedy

  • Deep mutational scanning: a new style of protein science

    Douglas M Fowler;Stanley Fields

  • The two-hybrid system: an assay for protein-protein interactions

    Stanley Fields;Rolf Sternglanz

  • Substrate-specific Activation of Sirtuins by Resveratrol

    Matt Kaeberlein;Thomas McDonagh;Birgit Heltweg;Jeffrey Hixon

  • A Combined Experimental and Computational Strategy to Define Protein Interaction Networks for Peptide Recognition Modules

    Amy Hin Yan Tong;Becky Drees;Giuliano Nardelli;Gary D. Bader

  • Protein analysis on a proteomic scale.

    Eric Phizicky;Philippe I. H. Bastiaens;Heng Zhu;Michael Snyder

  • Elimination of false positives that arise in using the two-hybrid system.

    P. Bartel;Cheng-Ting Chien;R. Sternglanz;S. Fields

  • A three-hybrid system to detect RNA-protein interactions in vivo

    Dhruba J. Sengupta;Beilin Zhang;Brian Kraemer;Pascale Pochart

  • System to detect protein-protein interactions

    Stanley Fields;Ok-Kyu Song

  • Global mapping of protein-DNA interactions in vivo by digital genomic footprinting

    Jay R. Hesselberth;Xiaoyu Chen;Zhihong Zhang;Zhihong Zhang;Peter J. Sabo

  • A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome

    William Noble;Zhi-un Duan;Mirela Andronescu;Kevin Schutz

Frequent Co-Authors

Greg Winter
Greg Winter University of Cambridge
Jay Shendure
Jay Shendure University of Washington
Peter Uetz
Peter Uetz Virginia Commonwealth University
Eric M. Phizicky
Eric M. Phizicky University of Rochester
Matt Kaeberlein
Matt Kaeberlein University of Washington
Brian K. Kennedy
Brian K. Kennedy National University of Singapore
Gerard Cagney
Gerard Cagney University College Dublin
Mark Johnston
Mark Johnston University of Colorado Denver
Trisha N. Davis
Trisha N. Davis University of Washington
Christine Queitsch
Christine Queitsch University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA often goes hand-in-hand with interests in healthcare, nursing, and allied sciences. If you’re considering diversifying your education, several flexible online degrees may be worth your attention. For example, nursing is a popular option, but entry requirements can vary. Not every program has the same admissions process, so it’s helpful to ask: is the teas test required for all nursing programs? This can help you find programs that match your strengths and preferences.

Another pathway is pursuing a masters in healthcare administration online, which opens up opportunities in healthcare management and leadership. If you’re interested in beginning your career quickly, consider fast track lpn programs that allow you to qualify as a Licensed Practical Nurse in less time.

For those seeking advanced roles in education or research, a phd nursing education online can prepare you for influential positions in academia or policy-making. Each of these options offers unique career prospects and complements a background in Genetics, keeping you at the cutting edge of healthcare and science.

Best Scientists Citing Stanley Fields

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles