World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
98
Citations
63933
World Ranking
792
National Ranking
398

Stanley Fields publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley Fields sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 219 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Stanley Fields D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley Fields sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2000 - Promega Biotechnology Research Award, American Society for Microbiology
  • 2000 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1997 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Stanley Fields is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily falls under the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to molecular biology, plant science, genetics, ecology, and biotechnology.

Their scholarly output includes work focused on several main topics, such as RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, plant virus research studies, RNA research and splicing, plant molecular biology research, RNA modifications and cancer, CRISPR and genetic engineering, as well as bacterial genetics and biotechnology.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Dimensionality reduction by UMAP to visualize physical and genetic interactions, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Synthetic promoter designs enabled by a comprehensive analysis of plant core promoters, 2021, Nature Plants
  • The regulatory landscape of Arabidopsis thaliana roots at single-cell resolution, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Identification of Plant Enhancers and Their Constituent Elements by STARR-seq in Tobacco Leaves, 2020, The Plant Cell
  • MaveRegistry: a collaboration platform for multiplexed assays of variant effect, 2021, Bioinformatics

Frequent coauthors in their research include Josh T. Cuperus, Christine Queitsch, Tobias Jores, Jackson Tonnies, and Michael W. Dorrity.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • The Plant Cell
  • Nature Plants
  • Bioinformatics

Their contributions to the academic community have been recognized through several awards including:

  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2015
  • Promega Biotechnology Research Award, American Society for Microbiology, 2000
  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences, 2000
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1997

Best Publications

  • A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions.

    Stanley Fields;Ok-kyu Song

  • A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Peter Uetz;Loic Giot;Gerard Cagney;Traci A. Mansfield

  • Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions.

    Christian von Mering;Roland Krause;Berend Snel;Michael Cornell

  • The two-hybrid system: a method to identify and clone genes for proteins that interact with a protein of interest.

    Cheng-Ting Chien;Paul L. Bartel;Rolf Sternglanz;Stanley Fields

  • A NETWORK OF PROTEIN?PROTEIN INTERACTIONS IN YEAST

    Benno Schwikowski;Peter Uetz;Stanley Fields

  • Regulation of Yeast Replicative Life Span by TOR and Sch9 in Response to Nutrients

    Matt Kaeberlein;R. Wilson Powers;Kristan K. Steffen;Eric A. Westman

  • Protein-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis.

    E M Phizicky;S Fields

  • Presence of a potent transcription activating sequence in the p53 protein.

    Stanley Fields;Sung Key Jang

  • A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome

    Zhijun Duan;Mirela Andronescu;Kevin Schutz;Sean McIlwain

  • Extension of chronological life span in yeast by decreased TOR pathway signaling

    R. Wilson Powers;Matt Kaeberlein;Seth D. Caldwell;Brian K. Kennedy

  • Deep mutational scanning: a new style of protein science

    Douglas M Fowler;Stanley Fields

  • The two-hybrid system: an assay for protein-protein interactions

    Stanley Fields;Rolf Sternglanz

  • Substrate-specific Activation of Sirtuins by Resveratrol

    Matt Kaeberlein;Thomas McDonagh;Birgit Heltweg;Jeffrey Hixon

  • A Combined Experimental and Computational Strategy to Define Protein Interaction Networks for Peptide Recognition Modules

    Amy Hin Yan Tong;Becky Drees;Giuliano Nardelli;Gary D. Bader

  • Protein analysis on a proteomic scale.

    Eric Phizicky;Philippe I. H. Bastiaens;Heng Zhu;Michael Snyder

  • Elimination of false positives that arise in using the two-hybrid system.

    P. Bartel;Cheng-Ting Chien;R. Sternglanz;S. Fields

  • A three-hybrid system to detect RNA-protein interactions in vivo

    Dhruba J. Sengupta;Beilin Zhang;Brian Kraemer;Pascale Pochart

  • System to detect protein-protein interactions

    Stanley Fields;Ok-Kyu Song

  • Global mapping of protein-DNA interactions in vivo by digital genomic footprinting

    Jay R. Hesselberth;Xiaoyu Chen;Zhihong Zhang;Zhihong Zhang;Peter J. Sabo

  • A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome

    William Noble;Zhi-un Duan;Mirela Andronescu;Kevin Schutz

Frequent Co-Authors

Greg Winter
Greg Winter University of Cambridge
Jay Shendure
Jay Shendure University of Washington
Peter Uetz
Peter Uetz Virginia Commonwealth University
Eric M. Phizicky
Eric M. Phizicky University of Rochester
Matt Kaeberlein
Matt Kaeberlein University of Washington
Brian K. Kennedy
Brian K. Kennedy National University of Singapore
Gerard Cagney
Gerard Cagney University College Dublin
Mark Johnston
Mark Johnston University of Colorado Denver
Trisha N. Davis
Trisha N. Davis University of Washington
Christine Queitsch
Christine Queitsch University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA often goes hand-in-hand with interests in healthcare, nursing, and allied sciences. If you’re considering diversifying your education, several flexible online degrees may be worth your attention. For example, nursing is a popular option, but entry requirements can vary. Not every program has the same admissions process, so it’s helpful to ask: is the teas test required for all nursing programs? This can help you find programs that match your strengths and preferences.

Another pathway is pursuing a masters in healthcare administration online, which opens up opportunities in healthcare management and leadership. If you’re interested in beginning your career quickly, consider fast track lpn programs that allow you to qualify as a Licensed Practical Nurse in less time.

For those seeking advanced roles in education or research, a phd nursing education online can prepare you for influential positions in academia or policy-making. Each of these options offers unique career prospects and complements a background in Genetics, keeping you at the cutting edge of healthcare and science.

Best Scientists Citing Stanley Fields

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles