World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthew D. Barber

Matthew D. Barber

Matthew D. Barber publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew D. Barber sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Matthew D. Barber D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew D. Barber sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew D. Barber is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a notable concentration in Surgery and Oncology. Within these areas, their work further extends into subfields such as Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Speech and Hearing.

Their academic contributions include a range of published papers, covering topics from surgical techniques to cancer care and patient management. Notable publications include:

  • "Biological and synthetic mesh assisted breast reconstruction procedures: Joint guidelines from the Association of Breast Surgery and the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons" (2021, European Journal of Surgical Oncology)
  • "Effect of Care Coordination Using an Allied Health Liaison Officer for Chronic Noncomplex Medical Conditions in Children" (2021, JAMA Pediatrics)
  • "Engaging Asian Patients with Diabetes in an Intensive 12-Week Pulsed Intervention: Mixed Method Research Study" (2022, Nursing economic$)
  • "The role of the surgeon in cancer care" (2024, Surgery (Oxford))
  • "Changing the Name of the Subspecialty (Back) to Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery" (2023, Urogynecology)

Their work frequently appears in several publication venues, most prominently in the European Journal of Surgical Oncology, where they have 4 publications. Other venues include Surgery (Oxford) with 2 publications, as well as JAMA Pediatrics, Nursing economic$, and Urogynecology.

Coauthors who often collaborate with Matthew D. Barber include Kenneth Elder, Lisa Whisker, Donna Egbeare, Ashu Gandhi, and Adam Gilmour.

The main topics and areas of study within their research portfolio are:

  • Breast Implant and Reconstruction
  • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Body Contouring and Surgery
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

The scientific output from Matthew D. Barber addresses both clinical surgical practice and broader oncological patient care approaches, with multiple papers contributing to joint guidelines and interdisciplinary coordination of care. Their recent works from 2021 through 2024 indicate ongoing research activity in surgical oncology, reconstructive surgery, and pediatric healthcare management.

Best Publications

  • Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women

    Ingrid Nygaard;Matthew D. Barber;Kathryn L. Burgio;Kathryn L. Burgio;Kimberly Kenton

  • Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7).

    Matthew Barber;M. D. Walters;R. C. Bump

  • An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) Joint Report on the Terminology for Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)

    Bernard T Haylen;Christopher F Maher;Matthew D Barber;Sérgio Camargo

  • Pelvic organ prolapse

    J Eric Jelovsek;Christopher Maher;Matthew D Barber

  • Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders.

    Matthew D. Barber;Matthew D. Barber;Maggie N. Kuchibhatla;Maggie N. Kuchibhatla;Carl F. Pieper;Carl F. Pieper;Richard C. Bump;Richard C. Bump

  • Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

    Matthew D. Barber;Linda Brubaker;Ingrid Nygaard;Thomas L. Wheeler

  • Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse.

    Matthew D. Barber;Christopher Maher

  • Women seeking treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse have decreased body image and quality of life.

    J. Eric Jelovsek;Matthew D. Barber

  • A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery

    C. W. Nager;L. Brubaker;H. J. Litman;H. M. Zyczynski

  • Sexual function in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.

    Matthew D. Barber;Anthony G. Visco;Jean F. Wyman;J. Andrew Fantl

  • Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation.

    Marie Fidela R. Paraiso;Matthew D. Barber;Tristi W. Muir;Mark D. Walters

  • Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

    Marie Fidela R. Paraiso;J. Eric Jelovsek;Anna Frick;Chi Chung Grace Chen

  • Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Comparative Data on Colposuspensions, Pubovaginal Slings, and Midurethral Tapes in the Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

    Giacomo Novara;Walter Artibani;Matthew D. Barber;Christopher R. Chapple

  • A Midurethral Sling to Reduce Incontinence after Vaginal Prolapse Repair

    John T. Wei;Ingrid Nygaard;Holly E. Richter;Charles W. Nager

  • Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: The OPTIMAL randomized trial

    Matthew D. Barber;Linda Brubaker;Kathryn L. Burgio;Holly E. Richter

  • Refractory Idiopathic Urge Urinary Incontinence and Botulinum A Injection

    Linda Brubaker;Holly E. Richter;Anthony Visco;Sangeeta Mahajan

  • Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review.

    Gouri B. Diwadkar;Matthew D. Barber;Benjamin Feiner;Christopher Maher

  • Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

    Matthew D. Barber;Anthony G. Visco;Alison C. Weidner;Cindy L. Amundsen

  • Vaginal Mesh Erosion After Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy

    Anthony G. Visco;Alison C. Weidner;Matthew D. Barber;Evan R. Myers

  • DEFINING SUCCESS AFTER SURGERY FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE

    Matthew D Barber

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda Brubaker
Linda Brubaker University of California, San Diego
Holly E. Richter
Holly E. Richter University of Alabama at Birmingham
Christopher G. Maher
Christopher G. Maher University of Sydney
Kathryn L. Burgio
Kathryn L. Burgio University of Alabama at Birmingham
Michael W. Kattan
Michael W. Kattan Cleveland Clinic
Evan R. Myers
Evan R. Myers Duke University
Tommaso Falcone
Tommaso Falcone Cleveland Clinic
Bo Shen
Bo Shen Columbia University
John T. Wei
John T. Wei University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Alan J. Wolfe
Alan J. Wolfe Loyola University Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online healthcare programs can open diverse career options beyond a traditional MD. Many students consider accredited mha programs to gain leadership roles in hospital administration and healthcare management. These master's degrees are designed for flexibility and are ideal for those looking to impact the healthcare system from a non-clinical standpoint.

For practicing nurses, advancing your credentials is easier than ever. Some universities now offer rn to bsn online with no clinicals, making it possible for working RNs to earn a bachelor's degree on their own schedule, without mandatory in-person training.

Nurses seeking the top level of education may benefit from exploring the shortest dnp programs online for an accelerated path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice, or even a dnp program without clinical hours for maximum flexibility.

All of these online options provide opportunities to advance in healthcare, with varying focuses on patient care, leadership, or administration.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew D. Barber

Trending Scientists