World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
35560
World Ranking
18610
National Ranking
9270

Evan R. Myers publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Evan R. Myers sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 498 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Evan R. Myers D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Evan R. Myers sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Evan R. Myers is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and specializes in the field of Medicine, with particular focus on Obstetrics and Gynecology. Their research spans multiple subfields including Reproductive Medicine, Oncology, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist has contributed extensively to scholarly publications, with notable frequent publication venues such as:

  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • UNC Libraries
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

The research topics addressed by Evan R. Myers cover a range of clinical and epidemiological concerns related to reproductive health and cancer, including:

  • Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Maternal and fetal healthcare

Collaboration is a significant aspect of this author's work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Laura J. Havrilesky
  • Wanda K. Nicholson
  • Anna H. Wu
  • Traci N. Bethea
  • Elisa V. Bandera

Evan R. Myers has contributed to numerous research papers. Recent publications include:

  • Estimated Prevalence of Risk Factors for Preeclampsia Among Individuals Giving Birth in the US in 2019, 2022, JAMA Network Open
  • Cost-effectiveness of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Among US Adults With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2022, JAMA Network Open
  • Comparative effectiveness of hysterectomy versus myomectomy on one-year health-related quality of life in women with uterine fibroids, 2020, Fertility and Sterility
  • Prevalence, incidence, and natural history of HPV infection in adult women ages 24 to 45 participating in a vaccine trial, 2020, Papillomavirus Research
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing "PARP inhibitors-for-all" to the biomarker-directed use of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy for newly diagnosed advanced stage ovarian cancer, 2020, Gynecologic Oncology

Best Publications

  • American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology Screening Guidelines for the Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer

    Debbie Saslow;Diane Solomon;Herschel W. Lawson;Maureen Killackey

  • Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions

    Luisa L. Villa;Gonzalo Perez;Susanne K. Kjaer;Jorma Paavonen

  • Accuracy of the Papanicolaou Test in Screening for and Follow‐up of Cervical Cytologic Abnormalities: A Systematic Review

    K Nanda;Dc McCrory;Er Myers;La Bastian

  • Clomiphene, Metformin, or Both for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

    Richard S. Legro;Huiman X. Barnhart;William D. Schlaff;Bruce R. Carr

  • Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period: incidence, risk factors, and mortality.

    Andra H. James;Margaret G. Jamison;Leo R. Brancazio;Evan R. Myers

  • Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. Women: 2010 to 2050.

    Jennifer M. Wu;Andrew F. Hundley;Rebekah G. Fulton;Evan R. Myers

  • Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review

    Evan R. Myers;Patricia Moorman;Jennifer M. Gierisch;Laura J. Havrilesky;Laura J. Havrilesky

  • Acute Myocardial Infarction in Pregnancy: A United States Population-Based Study

    Andra H. James;Margaret G. Jamison;Mimi S. Biswas;Leo R. Brancazio

  • Incidence and risk factors for stroke in pregnancy and the puerperium.

    Andra H. James;Cheryl D. Bushnell;Margaret G. Jamison;Evan R. Myers

  • Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, 18) recombinant vaccine in women aged 24-45 years: a randomised, double-blind trial.

    Nubia Muñoz;Ricardo Manalastas;Punee Pitisuttithum;Damrong Tresukosol

  • Mathematical Model for the Natural History of Human Papillomavirus Infection and Cervical Carcinogenesis

    Evan R. Myers;Douglas C. McCrory;Douglas C. McCrory;Kavita Nanda;Lori Bastian;Lori Bastian

  • A national study of the complications of lupus in pregnancy.

    Megan E.B. Clowse;Margaret Jamison;Evan Myers;Andra H. James

  • The Impact of Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV; Types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 Virus-Like Particle Vaccine on Infection and Disease Due to Oncogenic Nonvaccine HPV Types in Generally HPV-Naive Women Aged 16–26 Years

    Darron R. Brown;Susanne K. Kjaer;Kristján Sigurdsson;Ole-Erik Iversen

  • Impact of Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-6/11/16/18 Vaccine on All HPV-Associated Genital Diseases in Young Women

    Nubia Munoz;Susanne K. Kjaer;Kristján Sigurdsson;Ole Erik Iversen

  • Potential health and economic impact of adding a human papillomavirus vaccine to screening programs.

    Shalini L. Kulasingam;Evan R. Myers

  • Oral Contraceptive Use and Risk of Breast, Cervical, Colorectal, and Endometrial Cancers: A Systematic Review

    Jennifer M. Gierisch;Remy R. Coeytaux;Rachel Peragallo Urrutia;Laura J. Havrilesky

  • Histological dating of timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status.

    Christos Coutifaris;Evan R. Myers;David S. Guzick;Michael P. Diamond

  • End-of-study safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of quadrivalent HPV (types 6, 11, 16, 18) recombinant vaccine in adult women 24–45 years of age

    X Castellsague;N Munoz;P Pitisuttithum;Daron G. Ferris

  • A Pooled Analysis of Continued Prophylactic Efficacy of Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (Types 6/11/16/18) Vaccine against High-grade Cervical and External Genital Lesions

    Susanne K. Kjaer;Kristján Sigurdsson;Ole-Erik Iversen;Mauricio Hernandez-Avila

  • Genome-wide association of polycystic ovary syndrome implicates alterations in gonadotropin secretion in European ancestry populations

    M. Geoffrey Hayes;Margrit Urbanek;David A. Ehrmann;Loren L. Armstrong

Frequent Co-Authors

David B. Matchar
David B. Matchar Duke NUS Graduate Medical School
Gregory P. Samsa
Gregory P. Samsa Duke University
Michael P. Diamond
Michael P. Diamond Augusta University
Richard S. Legro
Richard S. Legro Pennsylvania State University
Bruce R. Carr
Bruce R. Carr The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Christos Coutifaris
Christos Coutifaris University of Pennsylvania
Vic Hasselblad
Vic Hasselblad Duke University
John E. Nestler
John E. Nestler Virginia Commonwealth University
Linda C. Giudice
Linda C. Giudice University of California, San Francisco
Susanne K. Kjaer
Susanne K. Kjaer University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA isn’t limited to the traditional MD track. Many students consider alternative healthcare careers or flexible learning paths. For those interested in fast-tracking their entry into advanced nursing, direct msn programs online offer a unique option—especially for non-nurses seeking a master's-level credential.

If you’re seeking practical, hands-on nursing education, online adn programs (Associate Degree in Nursing) may provide a more accessible entry point with flexible admissions criteria and a focus on real-world skills.

Not all students want to pursue clinical roles. If you’re interested in the administrative side of healthcare, accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid can lead to in-demand positions, often with the option to study from home.

For aspiring nurses wanting to bypass certain standardized tests, consider absn programs that don't require teas. These programs remove exam barriers, making the transition to a nursing career more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Evan R. Myers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles