World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
38600
World Ranking
8876
National Ranking
4570

Vic Hasselblad publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vic Hasselblad sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 379 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Vic Hasselblad D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vic Hasselblad sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Vic Hasselblad is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has contributed to scientific research across multiple disciplines. Their work includes recent papers published between 2020 and 2021, reflecting engagement in both methodological and editorial roles within the academic community.

Recent papers by Vic Hasselblad include:

  • Transforming Verbal Counts in Reports of Qualitative Descriptive Studies Into Numbers (2020, UNC Libraries)
  • Editorial Board (2021, Kidney International)
  • Editorial Board (2021, Kidney International)
  • Editorial Board (2021, Kidney International)
  • Editorial Board (2021, Kidney International)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several colleagues, indicating a networked research environment. Frequent co-authors of Hasselblad include:

  • Brad H. Rovin
  • Detlef Schlöndorff
  • Qais Al-Awqati
  • Saulo Klahr
  • St Louis

Vic Hasselblad's publications are concentrated in key academic venues, with the majority appearing in:

  • Kidney International
  • UNC Libraries

Their research spans several subfields, highlighting interdisciplinary interests. These subfields include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Electrochemistry
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health

Key research topics covered by their work include:

  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Epilepsy Research and Treatment

Best Publications

  • Accuracy of the Papanicolaou Test in Screening for and Follow‐up of Cervical Cytologic Abnormalities: A Systematic Review

    K Nanda;Dc McCrory;Er Myers;La Bastian

  • Effect of nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

    C. M. O'Connor;R. C. Starling;A. F. Hernandez;P. W. Armstrong

  • Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

    Abstr Act;James D. Douketis;Alex C. Spyropoulos;Scott Kaatz

  • Effect of Clinical Decision-Support Systems: A Systematic Review

    Tiffani J Bright;Anthony Wong;Ravi Dhurjati;Erin Bristow

  • Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness-which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports.

    Scott R Weingarten;James M Henning;Enkhe Badamgarav;Kevin Knight

  • Impact of the Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Critically Ill Patients: Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

    Monica R. Shah;Vic Hasselblad;Lynne W. Stevenson;Cynthia Binanay

  • The Patient-Centered Medical Home: A Systematic Review

    George L Jackson;Benjamin J Powers;Ranee Chatterjee;Janet Prvu Bettger

  • Pediatric vesicoureteral reflux guidelines panel summary report on the management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children

    Jack S. Elder;Craig A. Peters;Billy S. Arant;David H. Ewalt

  • Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests.

    Vic Hasselblad;Larry V. Hedges

  • Cardiorenal Interactions: Insights From the ESCAPE Trial

    Anju Nohria;Vic Hasselblad;Amanda Stebbins;Daniel F. Pauly

  • Benefits of smoking cessation for longevity.

    Donald H. Taylor;Vic Hasselblad;S. Jane Henley;Michael J. Thun

  • Cost-effectiveness of the Clinical Practice Recommendations in the AHCPR Guideline for Smoking Cessation

    Jerry Cromwell;William J. Bartosch;Michael C. Fiore;Victor Hasselblad

  • Reduction in heart failure events by the addition of a clinical pharmacist to the heart failure management team: results of the Pharmacist in Heart Failure Assessment Recommendation and Monitoring (PHARM) Study.

    Wendy A. Gattis;Vic Hasselblad;David J. Whellan;Christopher M. O'Connor

  • Single-therapy androgen suppression in men with advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Jerome Seidenfeld;David J. Samson;Vic Hasselblad;Naomi Aronson

  • Relation between dose of loop diuretics and outcomes in a heart failure population: Results of the ESCAPE Trial

    Vic Hasselblad;Wendy Gattis Stough;Monica R. Shah;Yuliya Lokhnygina

  • Oral Contraceptive Use and Risk of Breast, Cervical, Colorectal, and Endometrial Cancers: A Systematic Review

    Jennifer M. Gierisch;Remy R. Coeytaux;Rachel Peragallo Urrutia;Laura J. Havrilesky

  • Predischarge initiation of carvedilol in patients hospitalized for decompensated heart failure: Results of the initiation management predischarge: process for assessment of carvedilol therapy in heart failure (IMPACT-HF) trial

    Wendy A. Gattis;Christopher M. O'Connor;Dianne S. Gallup;Vic Hasselblad

  • Clinical Outcomes of Therapeutic Agents That Block the Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Integrin in Ischemic Heart Disease

    David F. Kong;Robert M. Califf;Dave P. Miller;David J. Moliterno

  • Benign prostatic hyperplasia: Diagnosis and treatment

    J. D. McConnell;M. J. Barry;R. C. Bruskewitz;A. J. Bueschen

  • Single-Therapy Androgen Suppression in Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer

    Jerome Seidenfeld;David J. Samson;Vic Hasselblad;Naomi Aronson

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert M. Califf
Robert M. Califf Duke University
Paul W. Armstrong
Paul W. Armstrong University of Alberta
Adrian F. Hernandez
Adrian F. Hernandez Duke University
Robert A. Harrington
Robert A. Harrington Cornell University
Gregory P. Samsa
Gregory P. Samsa Duke University
Evan R. Myers
Evan R. Myers Duke University
Justin A. Ezekowitz
Justin A. Ezekowitz University of Alberta
Randall C. Starling
Randall C. Starling Cleveland Clinic
John J.V. McMurray
John J.V. McMurray University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to dynamic and flexible career paths. Many students opt for specialized roles in healthcare without a traditional medical degree, thanks to a variety of online programs. For those interested in the organizational side of healthcare, online healthcare administration programs are a popular choice. These degrees teach important business and leadership skills needed in hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare settings.

Advancing further, students can consider affordable online mha programs to step into upper-level management roles. If clinical practice interests you, pursuing msn to dnp programs online can help nurses move into advanced practice and leadership. For future pharmacists, accredited online pharmacy schools offer flexible pathways to a Doctor of Pharmacy degree.

These online degrees cater to students balancing work or family, as they offer affordability and convenience. Choosing the right online degree can lead not only to rewarding careers but also greater access to leadership in the fast-growing field of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Vic Hasselblad

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles