What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Epistemology
- Metaphysics
- Consciousness
Dan Zahavi mostly deals with Epistemology, Phenomenology, Empathy, Philosophy of mind and Consciousness.
His work on Intersubjectivity, Intentionality, Phenomenology and Transcendental number as part of general Epistemology research is frequently linked to Analytic philosophy, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His Phenomenology research incorporates themes from Subjectivity, Metaphysics and Self.
His Self research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Conceptual framework and Social constructionism.
His Empathy research includes themes of Interpersonal communication, Philosophy of science and Social cognition.
His Computational theory of mind research includes elements of Cognitive science, Embodied cognition and Philosophy of psychology.
His most cited work include:
- Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person Perspective (629 citations)
- The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science (542 citations)
- EASE: Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience. (456 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Epistemology, Phenomenology, Psychoanalysis, Consciousness and Subjectivity.
His studies link Empathy with Epistemology.
His research in Empathy intersects with topics in Cognitive psychology and Social cognition.
His Phenomenology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Modern philosophy, Intentionality, Temporality and Intersubjectivity.
His study looks at the relationship between Consciousness and topics such as Self, which overlap with Self-awareness.
His Phenomenology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Cognitive science and Psychopathology.
He most often published in these fields:
- Epistemology (53.81%)
- Phenomenology (36.19%)
- Psychoanalysis (19.52%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Epistemology (53.81%)
- Phenomenology (36.19%)
- Psychoanalysis (19.52%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Dan Zahavi mainly focuses on Epistemology, Phenomenology, Psychoanalysis, Consciousness and Qualitative research.
In the field of Epistemology, his study on Collective intentionality, Transcendental number and Philosophy of psychology overlaps with subjects such as Phenomenology and Interpretation.
The Phenomenology study combines topics in areas such as Empathy and Blame.
His biological study deals with issues like Self-consciousness, which deal with fields such as Subjectivity.
His research investigates the link between Subjectivity and topics such as Embodied cognition that cross with problems in Cognitive science.
His Consciousness study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Personhood, Thought insertion, Skepticism and Universality.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Getting It Quite Wrong: Van Manen and Smith on Phenomenology. (29 citations)
- Getting It Quite Wrong: Van Manen and Smith on Phenomenology. (29 citations)
- Phenomenology: The Basics (29 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Epistemology
- Metaphysics
- Consciousness
His primary areas of investigation include Epistemology, Phenomenology, Qualitative research, Collective intentionality and Philosophy of science.
He integrates Epistemology with Phenomenology in his research.
The various areas that Dan Zahavi examines in his Phenomenology study include Direct and indirect realism and Blame.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Transcendental number and Nursing, Nursing science in addition to Qualitative research.
His studies in Philosophy of science integrate themes in fields like Construal level theory, Empathy, Philosophy of language and Embeddedness.
His Philosophy of psychology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Self-consciousness, Consciousness, Philosophy of mind, Relation and Set.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
