World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 100 613 535 389 329 223 52750
Neuroscience 100 746 669 415 362 216 52438

Mark S. Seidenberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark S. Seidenberg between 1979 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark S. Seidenberg published across 48 years, from 1979 to 2026, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 1999. 1 of the 235 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 1999. 1979: 5 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 3 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 0 publications 2026: 1 publication
1979 2026

235 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark S. Seidenberg: publications per year, 1979 to 2026
Year Publications
1979 5
1980 2
1981 4
1982 1
1983 3
1984 5
1985 9
1986 3
1987 2
1988 2
1989 7
1990 5
1991 1
1992 2
1993 3
1994 8
1995 4
1996 7
1997 6
1998 10
1999 15
2000 6
2001 5
2002 5
2003 8
2004 4
2005 7
2006 4
2007 11
2008 2
2009 5
2010 13
2011 6
2012 8
2013 10
2014 7
2015 4
2016 4
2017 2
2018 4
2019 3
2020 5
2021 3
2022 3
2023 0
2024 1
2025 0
2026 1
Total 235
Download as CSV

Mark S. Seidenberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Seidenberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 223 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 223
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark S. Seidenberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Seidenberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57 100
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Mark S. Seidenberg is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on psychology, with a concentration in developmental and educational psychology as well as cognitive neuroscience, statistics and probability, gender studies, and linguistics and language.

The scientist's work addresses several central topics, including:

  • Reading and literacy development
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Language development and disorders
  • Neurobiology of language and bilingualism
  • Educational strategies and epistemologies
  • Neuroscience, education and cognitive function
  • Gender studies in language

Seidenberg has published research in various academic journals, illustrating a broad scope within their field. Notable publication venues include:

  • Reading Research Quarterly
  • Journal of Memory and Language
  • Psychological Science
  • Journal of Educational Psychology
  • Neuropsychologia

Recent significant papers authored by or associated with Seidenberg include:

  • "Lost in Translation? Challenges in Connecting Reading Science and Educational Practice" (2020), Reading Research Quarterly
  • "Individual differences in learning the regularities between orthography, phonology and semantics predict early reading skills" (2020), Journal of Memory and Language
  • "What Might Books Be Teaching Young Children About Gender?" (2021), Psychological Science
  • "How you read affects what you gain: Individual differences in the functional organization of the reading system predict intervention gains in children with reading disabilities." (2021), Journal of Educational Psychology
  • "Differential activation of the visual word form area during auditory phoneme perception in youth with dyslexia" (2020), Neuropsychologia

Throughout their career, Seidenberg has collaborated frequently with a number of researchers, including:

  • Matthew James Cooper Borkenhagen
  • Noam Siegelman
  • Jay G. Rueckl
  • Mark van den Bunt
  • Jason D. Zevin

Seidenberg received recognition as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2003.

Best Publications

  • A Distributed, Developmental Model of Word Recognition and Naming.

    Mark S. Seidenberg;James L. McClelland

  • Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains.

    David C. Plaut;James L. McClelland;Mark S. Seidenberg;Karalyn Patterson

  • The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution

    Maryellen C. MacDonald;Neal J. Pearlmutter;Mark S. Seidenberg

  • Computing the Meanings of Words in Reading: Cooperative Division of Labor Between Visual and Phonological Processes.

    Michael W. Harm;Mark S. Seidenberg

  • How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading

    Keith Rayner;Barbara R. Foorman;Charles A. Perfetti;David Pesetsky

  • Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: insights from connectionist models.

    Michael W. Harm;Mark S. Seidenberg

  • Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things

    Ken McRae;George S. Cree;Mark S. Seidenberg;Chris Mcnorgan

  • When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition

    Mark S. Seidenberg;Gloria S. Waters;Marcia A. Barnes;Michael K. Tanenhaus

  • Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing ☆ ☆☆ ★ ★★

    Mark S Seidenberg;Michael K Tanenhaus;James M Leiman;Marie Bienkowski

  • On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.

    Ken McRae;Virginia R. de Sa;Mark S. Seidenberg

  • The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.

    Mark S. Seidenberg

  • Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition

    Mark S. Seidenberg;Gloria S. Waters;Michael Sanders;Pearl Langer

  • Evidence for Multiple Stages in the Processing of Ambiguous Words in Syntactic Contexts.

    Michael K. Tanenhaus;James M. Leiman;Mark S. Seidenberg

  • The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography.

    Rebecca Treiman;John Mullennix;Ranka Bijeljac-Babic;E. Daylene Richmond-Welty

  • On the bases of two subtypes of development dyslexia

    Franklin R. Manis;Mark S. Seidenberg;Lisa M. Doi;Catherine McBride-Chang

  • Language Acquisition and Use: Learning and Applying Probabilistic Constraints

    Mark S. Seidenberg

  • Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: A connectionist model

    Marc F. Joanisse;Mark S. Seidenberg

  • Neuropsychological Characteristics of the Syndrome of Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

    Bruce P. Hermann;Michael Seidenberg;Jen Schoenfeld;Keith Davies

  • Semantic effects in single-word naming.

    Eamon Strain;Karalyn Patterson;Mark S. Seidenberg

  • Neural systems underlying the recognition of familiar and newly learned faces.

    Catherine L. Leveroni;Michael Seidenberg;Andrew R. Mayer;Andrew R. Mayer;Larissa A. Mead

Frequent Co-Authors

Franklin R. Manis
Franklin R. Manis University of Southern California
Maryellen C. MacDonald
Maryellen C. MacDonald University of Wisconsin–Madison
Marc F. Joanisse
Marc F. Joanisse University of Western Ontario
Jeffrey R. Binder
Jeffrey R. Binder Medical College of Wisconsin
Michael K. Tanenhaus
Michael K. Tanenhaus University of Rochester
James L. McClelland
James L. McClelland Stanford University
Rutvik H. Desai
Rutvik H. Desai University of South Carolina
Lisa L. Conant
Lisa L. Conant Medical College of Wisconsin
David C. Plaut
David C. Plaut Carnegie Mellon University
Nicole Landi
Nicole Landi University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in pursuing Psychology in the USA, there are several online degree options and career pathways to consider. Online programs in psychology or related fields allow for flexibility and can prepare you for a variety of fulfilling roles in mental health and behavioral services.

One prominent career path is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). For practical advice on pursuing this role, explore the guide on becoming a bcba in Winston Salem to understand certification requirements and job outlooks.

Many students also choose to become mental health counselors, working directly with clients to support emotional and psychological well-being. Steps and recommendations for this pathway can differ depending on the region. You can read tailored guides on how to become a mental health counselor in specific locations including how to become a mental health counselor in Albuquerque, how to become a mental health counselor in Anaheim, and how to become a mental health counselor in Anchorage.

Whether you are pursuing a counseling certification or aiming for a specialized credential like BCBA, combining online studies with local licensing requirements will open diverse career opportunities in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Mark S. Seidenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles