World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
8074
World Ranking
10042
National Ranking
5291

Franklin R. Manis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franklin R. Manis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 65 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Franklin R. Manis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franklin R. Manis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Franklin R. Manis is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their academic career and contributions are primarily connected with this institution.

There is no available information on specific recent papers published by Franklin R. Manis. Similarly, there are no records of frequent co-authors or main publication venues associated with their work.

No books or book publications linked to a particular publisher have been documented for this researcher.

Data on the main fields of study, subfields, or main topics addressed by Franklin R. Manis in their research have not been provided.

No awards or recognitions have been recorded in the available information.

Franklin R. Manis is currently alive based on the provided data.

Best Publications

  • On the bases of two subtypes of development dyslexia

    Franklin R. Manis;Mark S. Seidenberg;Lisa M. Doi;Catherine McBride-Chang

  • Prediction of First-Grade Reading in Spanish-Speaking English-Language Learners.

    Kim A. Lindsey;Franklin R. Manis;Caroline E. Bailey

  • Naming Speed, Phonological Awareness, and Orthographic Knowledge in Second Graders

    Franklin R. Manis;Lisa Michelle Doi;Bhakhtawahr Bhadha

  • Language deficits in dyslexic children: speech perception, phonology, and morphology.

    Marc F. Joanisse;Franklin R. Manis;Patricia Keating;Mark S. Seidenberg

  • See Dick RAN: Rapid Naming and the Longitudinal Prediction of Reading Subskills in First and Second Graders

    Franklin R. Manis;Mark S. Seidenberg;Lisa M. Doi

  • Are speech perception deficits associated with developmental dyslexia

    Franklin R. Manis;Catherine Mcbride-Chang;Mark S. Seidenberg;Patricia Keating

  • Development of Reading in Grades K-2 in Spanish-Speaking English-Language Learners.

    Franklin R. Manis;Kim A. Lindsey;Caroline E. Bailey

  • Deficits in perceptual noise exclusion in developmental dyslexia.

    Anne J Sperling;Zhong-Lin Lu;Franklin R Manis;Mark S Seidenberg

  • Structural invariance in the associations of naming speed, phonological awareness, and verbal reasoning in good and poor readers: A test of the double deficit hypothesis

    Catherine McBride-Chang;Franklin R. Manis

  • Development of Phonological and Orthographic Skill: A 2-Year Longitudinal Study of Dyslexic Children

    Franklin R. Manis;Rebecca Custodio;Patricia A. Szeszulski

  • A longitudinal analysis of English language learners’ word decoding and reading comprehension

    Jonathan Nakamoto;Kim A. Lindsey;Franklin R. Manis

  • Acquisition of word identification skills in normal and disabled readers

    Franklin R. Manis

  • A Cross-Linguistic Investigation of English Language Learners' Reading Comprehension in English and Spanish

    Jonathan Nakamoto;Kim A. Lindsey;Franklin R. Manis

  • Neuroanatomical precursors of dyslexia identified from pre-reading through to age 11

    Kristi A. Clark;Turid Helland;Karsten Specht;Karsten Specht;Katherine L. Narr

  • Print exposure as a predictor of word reading and reading comprehension in disabled and nondisabled readers

    Catherine McBride-Chang;Franklin R. Manis;Mark S. Seidenberg;Rebecca G. Custodio

  • Motion-Perception Deficits and Reading Impairment: It's the Noise, Not the Motion

    Anne J. Sperling;Zhong-Lin Lu;Franklin R. Manis;Mark S. Seidenberg

  • Sensitivity to orthographic familiarity in the occipito-temporal region.

    Jennifer Lynn Bruno;Allison Zumberge;Franklin R. Manis;Zhong-Lin Lu

  • Developmental differences in the allocation of processing capacity

    Franklin R Manis;Daniel P Keating;Frederick J Morrison

  • Cognitive functioning, neurologic status and brain imaging in classical galactosemia

    Francine Ratner Kaufman;Cammie McBride-Chang;Franklin R. Manis;Jon A. Wolff

  • Selective magnocellular deficits in dyslexia: a "phantom contour" study.

    Anne J Sperling;Zhong lin Lu;Franklin R Manis;Mark S Seidenberg

  • Variation among developmental dyslexics: evidence from a printed-word-learning task.

    Caroline E Bailey;Franklin R Manis;William C Pedersen;Mark S Seidenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark S. Seidenberg
Mark S. Seidenberg University of Wisconsin–Madison
Zhong-Lin Lu
Zhong-Lin Lu New York University Shanghai
Catherine McBride-Chang
Catherine McBride-Chang Purdue University West Lafayette
Karsten Specht
Karsten Specht University of Bergen
Jon A. Wolff
Jon A. Wolff University of Wisconsin–Madison
Kenneth Hugdahl
Kenneth Hugdahl University of Bergen
Marc F. Joanisse
Marc F. Joanisse University of Western Ontario
Katherine L. Narr
Katherine L. Narr University of California, Los Angeles
Arthur W. Toga
Arthur W. Toga University of Southern California
Daniel P. Keating
Daniel P. Keating University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology as a field opens doors to a wide range of specializations and flexible learning options. Students today are increasingly turning to online degree programs for both undergraduate and graduate studies. Pursuing an online degree for psychology can provide a strong foundation and allow for further specialization.

For those interested in the workplace and human behavior, consider an online masters in industrial organizational psychology. This degree prepares graduates to analyze organizational dynamics, improve performance, and foster positive work environments. Similar career opportunities are also available if you choose an online masters program organizational psychology, which focuses on leadership development, conflict resolution, and human resources.

If you are intrigued by the intersection of psychology and the law, earning a forensic psychology master degree could lead to roles in the criminal justice system, correctional facilities, or law enforcement agencies.

These diverse online options ensure a flexible pathway for working professionals, recent graduates, and career changers eager to advance in the dynamic field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Franklin R. Manis