World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 35 9090 8753 308 295 119 3589

Joachim Scholta publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joachim Scholta between 1999 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joachim Scholta published across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2024. 4 of the 149 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2024. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
1999 2026

149 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joachim Scholta: publications per year, 1999 to 2026
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 3
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 5
2005 0
2006 2
2007 2
2008 5
2009 6
2010 7
2011 7
2012 14
2013 10
2014 5
2015 5
2016 11
2017 9
2018 12
2019 9
2020 5
2021 2
2022 3
2023 3
2024 17
2025 3
2026 1
Total 149
Download as CSV

Joachim Scholta publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Scholta sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 118–127 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 119 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341 119
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Joachim Scholta D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Scholta sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262 35
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Joachim Scholta is affiliated with the Zentrum für Sonnenenergie- und Wasserstoff-Forschung Baden-Württemberg in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on engineering and materials science, with significant contributions in the fields of electrical and electronic engineering as well as renewable energy, sustainability, and the environment.

Their work spans multiple topics related to energy conversion and materials, particularly within fuel cell technology and advanced energy materials. The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
  • Conducting polymers and applications
  • Advanced battery technologies research
  • Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Machine Learning in Materials Science

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Joachim Scholta include:

  • Florian Wilhelm
  • Markus Hölzle
  • Henning Markötter
  • Ingo Manke
  • Christian Wachtel

Key venues where their research has been published include:

  • ECS Transactions
  • ECS Meeting Abstracts
  • Fuel Cells
  • ChemSusChem
  • Journal of Power Sources

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Joachim Scholta demonstrate a focus on fuel cell performance, material degradation, and water management in energy systems. Selected publications include:

  • "Enhanced Water Management in PEMFCs: Perforated Catalyst Layer and Microporous Layers" (2020, ChemSusChem)
  • "Influence of Structural Modification of Micro-Porous Layer and Catalyst Layer on Performance and Water Management of PEM Fuel Cells: Hydrophobicity and Porosity" (2020, Fuel Cells)
  • "Experimental validation of pore-scale models for gas diffusion layers" (2022, Journal of Power Sources)
  • "Local ageing effects of polymer electrolyte fuel cell membrane electrode assemblies due to accelerated durability testing" (2022, Fuel Cells)
  • "Degradation Characteristics of Electrospun Gas Diffusion Layers with Custom Pore Structures for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells" (2021, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces)

Best Publications

  • Synchrotron X-ray tomography for investigations of water distribution in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells

    Ph. Krüger;H. Markötter;J. Haußmann;M. Klages

  • Investigation on the influence of channel geometries on PEMFC performance

    J. Scholta;G. Escher;W. Zhang;L. Küppers

  • Influence of cracks in the microporous layer on the water distribution in a PEM fuel cell investigated by synchrotron radiography

    H. Markötter;J. Haußmann;R. Alink;C. Tötzke

  • Investigation of 3D water transport paths in gas diffusion layers by combined in-situ synchrotron X-ray radiography and tomography

    H. Markötter;I. Manke;Ph. Krüger;T. Arlt

  • Investigations on novel low-cost graphite composite bipolar plates

    Unknown

  • Investigation of water droplet kinetics and optimization of channel geometry for PEM fuel cell cathodes

    Nawaz Akhtar;Arshad Qureshi;Joachim Scholta;Christoph Hartnig

  • Visualization of the water distribution in perforated gas diffusion layers by means of synchrotron X-ray radiography

    H. Markötter;R. Alink;J. Haußmann;K. Dittmann

  • Synchrotron radiography and tomography of water transport in perforated gas diffusion media

    Jan Haußmann;Henning Markötter;Robert Alink;Alexander Bauder

  • Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell flow field design criteria – Application to parallel serpentine flow patterns

    A. Ghanbarian;M.J. Kermani;J. Scholta;M. Abdollahzadeh

  • Effects of compression on water distribution in gas diffusion layer materials of PEMFC in a point injection device by means of synchrotron X-ray imaging

    Utku U. Ince;Utku U. Ince;Henning Markötter;Michael G. George;Hang Liu

  • Long-Term Testing in Dynamic Mode of HT-PEMFC H3PO4/PBI Celtec-P Based Membrane Electrode Assemblies for Micro-CHP Applications

    P. Moçotéguy;B. Ludwig;J. Scholta;Y. Nedellec

  • In-situ synchrotron X-ray radiography on high temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cells

    Wiebke Maier;Tobias Arlt;Christoph Wannek;Ingo Manke

  • Carbon felt electrodes for redox flow battery: Impact of compression on transport properties

    Rupak Banerjee;Nico Bevilacqua;Arezou Mohseninia;Benjamin Wiedemann

  • Neutron tomographic investigations of water distributions in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell stacks

    Henning Markötter;Ingo Manke;Robert Kuhn;Tobias Arlt

  • Externally cooled high temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell stack

    J. Scholta;M. Messerschmidt;L. Jörissen;Ch. Hartnig

  • Investigation of water transport dynamics in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells based on high porous micro porous layers

    Saad S. Alrwashdeh;Saad S. Alrwashdeh;Saad S. Alrwashdeh;Henning Markötter;Henning Markötter;Jan Haußmann;Tobias Arlt

  • Development and performance of a 10kW PEMFC stack

    Unknown

  • Measuring device for synchrotron X-ray imaging and first results of high temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells

    R. Kuhn;J. Scholta;Ph. Krüger;Ch. Hartnig

  • Long term testing of start–stop cycles on high temperature PEM fuel cell stack

    Arvind Kannan;Alexander Kabza;Joachim Scholta

  • Numerical and experimental analysis of liquid water distribution in PEM fuel cells

    Željko Penga;Željko Penga;Christian Bergbreiter;Frano Barbir;Frano Barbir;Joachim Scholta

  • Morphology studies on high-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell electrodes

    Florian Mack;Merle Klages;Joachim Scholta;Ludwig Jörissen

  • Neutron radiographic in operando investigation of water transport in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with channel barriers

    Saad S. Alrwashdeh;Saad S. Alrwashdeh;Saad S. Alrwashdeh;Ingo Manke;Henning Markötter;Henning Markötter;Jan Haußmann

  • In Operando Quantification of Three-Dimensional Water Distribution in Nanoporous Carbon-Based Layers in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells

    Saad S. Alrwashdeh;Ingo Manke;Henning Markötter;Merle Klages

  • Investigations on dynamic water transport characteristics in flow field channels using neutron imaging techniques

    M. Klages;S. Enz;H. Markötter;I. Manke

  • Influence of artificially aged gas diffusion layers on the water management of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells analyzed with in-operando synchrotron imaging

    Tobias Arlt;Tobias Arlt;Merle Klages;Matthias Messerschmidt;Joachim Scholta

  • Estimation of water distribution and degradation mechanisms in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell gas diffusion layers using a 3D Monte Carlo model

    K. Seidenberger;F. Wilhelm;T. Schmitt;W. Lehnert

  • Development of a stack having an optimized flow field structure with low cross transport effects

    J. Scholta;F. Häussler;W. Zhang;L. Küppers

  • Effect of ageing of gas diffusion layers on the water distribution in flow field channels of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells

    Juliane Kätzel;Henning Markötter;Henning Markötter;Tobias Arlt;Merle Klages

Frequent Co-Authors

Ingo Manke
Ingo Manke Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie
John Banhart
John Banhart Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie
Werner Lehnert
Werner Lehnert RWTH Aachen University
Aimy Bazylak
Aimy Bazylak University of Toronto
Detlef Stolten
Detlef Stolten RWTH Aachen University
Simon Thiele
Simon Thiele Helmholtz Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg
Kaspar Andreas Friedrich
Kaspar Andreas Friedrich German Aerospace Center
Frano Barbir
Frano Barbir University of Split
Benjamin Hatton
Benjamin Hatton University of Toronto
Volker Schmidt
Volker Schmidt University of Ulm

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees linked to Engineering and Technology can open diverse career avenues, especially when combined with business and marketing expertise. Students looking to lead operations in technology sectors may consider mba programs in operations management. These programs focus on streamlining processes, supply chain management, and strategic planning—skills highly valued in engineering firms.

For those seeking flexibility, there are options to pursue an online mba without gmat requirements, allowing aspiring professionals to advance their qualifications without the need for standardized test scores. Budget-conscious students can find quality education through an mba under 30k, making advanced study more accessible.

Additionally, the importance of digital presence is growing for tech companies, and acquiring specialized skills through a social media marketing degree can empower engineers and technologists to optimize their brand and outreach in a competitive marketplace.

Combining technical skills with business and marketing knowledge not only enhances employability but also prepares graduates for leadership roles in the evolving tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Joachim Scholta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles