World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 57 825 754 34 34 296 9682

Aimy Bazylak publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Aimy Bazylak between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Aimy Bazylak published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 14.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2016. 12 of the 337 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2016. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 2 publications
2004 2026

337 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Aimy Bazylak: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 3
2006 3
2007 3
2008 6
2009 4
2010 9
2011 21
2012 20
2013 22
2014 19
2015 15
2016 32
2017 31
2018 12
2019 29
2020 17
2021 21
2022 14
2023 25
2024 18
2025 10
2026 2
Total 337
Download as CSV

Aimy Bazylak publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aimy Bazylak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 287–296 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 296 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74 296
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Aimy Bazylak D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aimy Bazylak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42 57
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Best Publications

  • Liquid water visualization in PEM fuel cells: A review

    Unknown

  • OpenPNM: A Pore Network Modeling Package

    Jeff Gostick;Mahmoudreza Aghighi;James Hinebaugh;Tom Tranter

  • Effect of compression on liquid water transport and microstructure of PEMFC gas diffusion layers

    A. Bazylak;D. Sinton;Z.-S. Liu;N. Djilali

  • Dynamic water transport and droplet emergence in PEMFC gas diffusion layers

    Aimy Bazylak;David Sinton;Ned Djilali

  • Improved fuel utilization in microfluidic fuel cells: A computational study

    Aimy Bazylak;David Sinton;Ned Djilali

  • A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell stack testing

    Unknown

  • A high-performance, durable and low-cost proton exchange membrane electrolyser with stainless steel components

    S. Stiber;N. Sata;T. Morawietz;S. A. Ansar

  • Microscale Tomography Investigations of Heterogeneous Porosity Distributions of PEMFC GDLs

    Unknown

  • Porous Transport Layers for Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis Under Extreme Conditions of Current Density, Temperature, and Pressure

    Svenja Stiber;Harald Balzer;Astrid Wierhake;Florian Josef Wirkert

  • Synchrotron X-ray radiographic investigations of liquid water transport behavior in a PEMFC with MPL-coated GDLs

    Unknown

  • Feasibility study of using microfluidic platforms for visualizing bubble flows in electrolyzer gas diffusion layers

    Unknown

  • Determination of transport parameters for multiphase flow in porous gas diffusion electrodes using a capillary network model

    B. Markicevic;A. Bazylak;N. Djilali

  • Synchrotron Investigation of Microporous Layer Thickness on Liquid Water Distribution in a PEM Fuel Cell

    Unknown

  • Heterogeneous Through-Plane Porosity Distributions for Treated PEMFC GDLs I. PTFE Effect

    Unknown

  • Unstructured Pore Network Modeling with Heterogeneous PEMFC GDL Porosity Distributions

    Unknown

  • Balancing mass transport resistance and membrane resistance when tailoring microporous layer thickness for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells operating at high current densities

    P. Antonacci;S. Chevalier;J. Lee;N. Ge

  • Pore network modelling to enhance liquid water transport through porous transport layers for polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzers

    Unknown

  • Influence of limiting throat and flow regime on oxygen bubble saturation of polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer porous transport layers

    Unknown

  • The Porous Transport Layer in Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis: Perspectives on a Complex Component

    Unknown

  • Effects of compression on water distribution in gas diffusion layer materials of PEMFC in a point injection device by means of synchrotron X-ray imaging

    Utku U. Ince;Utku U. Ince;Henning Markötter;Michael G. George;Hang Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Ned Djilali
Ned Djilali University of Victoria
David Sinton
David Sinton University of Toronto
Joachim Scholta
Joachim Scholta Zentrum für Sonnenenergie- und Wasserstoff-Forschung Baden-Württemberg
Kaspar Andreas Friedrich
Kaspar Andreas Friedrich German Aerospace Center
Jean W. Zu
Jean W. Zu Stevens Institute of Technology
Benjamin Hatton
Benjamin Hatton University of Toronto
Pang-Chieh Sui
Pang-Chieh Sui Wuhan University of Technology
Ingo Manke
Ingo Manke Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie
Jin Yong Lee
Jin Yong Lee Sungkyunkwan University
Hani E. Naguib
Hani E. Naguib University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering offer exciting technical careers, many students explore related fields to diversify their skills or career options. For example, speech pathology is a growing field that offers rewarding opportunities in healthcare and education. Prospective students interested in this area can find programs suited to various needs, including those looking for the easiest slp masters to get into. These programs often provide flexible admissions requirements, making entry more accessible.

Cost is another important consideration. Understanding how much does an online speech pathology degree cost can help students budget effectively and plan for financial aid or scholarships.

Military veterans have special educational benefits, and many can take advantage of programs designed specifically for them. Online options tailored for veterans are available, highlighting the importance of exploring speech pathology degree online for veterans to use these advantages fully.

For those eager to complete their education quickly, several institutions offer accelerated speech pathology programs online. These options allow students to enter the workforce sooner without compromising on educational quality.

Exploring these related online programs can complement a background in engineering or serve as alternative pathways to fulfilling careers in specialized and impactful fields.

Best Scientists Citing Aimy Bazylak

Recently Published Articles