World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
9966
World Ranking
6130
National Ranking
3333

Edgar Zurif publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edgar Zurif sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 85 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Edgar Zurif D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edgar Zurif sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1989 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Edgar Zurif is affiliated with Brandeis University in the United States. The scientist's research contributions currently do not include publicly listed recent papers, frequent co-authors, or specific publication venues. There is also no recorded information on book publications or detailed fields and subfields of study associated with their work.

Edgar Zurif was recognized in 1989 as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, an award granted without a publicly available citation.

The profile does not reveal specific research topics, fields, or main themes explored by Edgar Zurif, nor any data on collaborative networks or academic output metrics.

Best Publications

  • Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: evidence from aphasia

    Alfonso Caramazza;Edgar B. Zurif

  • The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French-English bilinguals

    A. Caramazza;G. H. Yeni‐Komshian;E. B. Zurif;E. Carbone

  • The perception and production of Voice-Onset Time in aphasia

    Sheila E. Blumstein;William E. Cooper;Edgar B. Zurif;Alfonso Caramazza

  • An On-Line Analysis of Syntactic Processing in Broca′s and Wernicke′s Aphasia

    E. Zurif;D. Swinney;P. Prather;J. Solomon

  • Familial handedness and left-right differences in auditory and visual perception

    E.B. Zurif;E.B. Zurif;M.P. Bryden;M.P. Bryden

  • Neural basis for sentence comprehension: grammatical and short-term memory components.

    Ayanna Cooke;Edgar B. Zurif;Edgar B. Zurif;Christian DeVita;David Alsop

  • Grammatical judgments of agrammatic aphasics

    E.B. Zurif;A. Caramazza;R. Myerson

  • Real-time processing implications of enriched composition at the syntax-semantics interface.

    Maria M. Piñango;Edgar Zurif;Ray Jackendoff

  • Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs.

    Lewis P. Shapiro;Edgar Zurif;Jane Grimshaw

  • The effects of focal brain damage on sentence processing: An examination of the neurological organization of a mental module

    David Swinney;Edgar Zurif;Janet Nicol

  • The critical role of group studies in neuropsychology: comprehension regularities in Broca's aphasia.

    Yosef Grodzinsky;Yosef Grodzinsky;Maria Mercedes Piñango;Maria Mercedes Piñango;Edgar Zurif;Edgar Zurif;Dan Drai

  • Semantic feature representations for normal and aphasic language

    E.B. Zurif;E.B. Zurif;A. Caramazza;R. Myerson;J. Galvin

  • The relation between gesture and language in aphasic communication.

    Michael Cicone;Wendy Wapner;Nancy Foldi;Edgar Zurif

  • Dyslexia in relation to cerebral dominance and temporal analysis

    Unknown

  • Right-Hemispheric Damage and Verbal Problem Solving Behavior'

    Alfonso Caramazza;Joel Gordon;Edgar B. Zurif;David DeLuca

  • The allocation of memory resources during sentence comprehension: evidence from the elderly.

    Edgar Zurif;David Swinney;Penney Prather;Penney Prather;Arthur Wingfield;Arthur Wingfield

  • Visual communication in aphasia.

    Howard Gardner;Howard Gardner;Edgar B. Zurif;Edgar B. Zurif;Thomasin Berry;Thomasin Berry;Errol Baker;Errol Baker

  • Neurological distribution of processing resources underlying language comprehension

    David Swinney;Edgar Zurif;Penny Prather;Tracy Love

  • How left inferior frontal cortex participates in syntactic processing: Evidence from aphasia

    Tracy Love;David Swinney;Matthew Walenski;Edgar Zurif

  • Naming in aphasia: Interacting effects of form and function

    Peter J. Whitehouse;Alfonso Caramazza;Edgar Zurif

  • Syntactic processing in aphasia.

    David Swinney;Edgar Zurif

Frequent Co-Authors

Howard Gardner
Howard Gardner Harvard University
Alfonso Caramazza
Alfonso Caramazza Harvard University
David Swinney
David Swinney University of California, San Diego
Hiram Brownell
Hiram Brownell Boston College
Lewis P. Shapiro
Lewis P. Shapiro San Diego State University
Yosef Grodzinsky
Yosef Grodzinsky Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Murray Grossman
Murray Grossman University of Pennsylvania
Arthur Wingfield
Arthur Wingfield Brandeis University
Elizabeth Bates
Elizabeth Bates University of California, San Diego
Susan Carey
Susan Carey Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens a wide array of online learning options and career pathways. If you’re looking for speed and flexibility, many institutions now offer accelerated online programs to help you earn your qualifications quickly, while balancing work or personal commitments.

For undergraduates, there are specialized options such as accelerated online psychology bachelor's programs in Houston or accelerated online psychology degrees in Colorado. These programs are designed for motivated students who want to fast-track their education and begin their careers sooner.

At the doctoral level, students benefit from opportunities like accelerated online psychology doctorate degrees in USA as well as state-specific offerings including fastest online psychology doctorate programs in Virginia. These advanced degrees prepare graduates for leadership roles in clinical practice, research, or academic settings.

Whether you aim for a bachelor’s or doctorate, choosing an accelerated online program can help you achieve your educational and career goals in less time, while providing flexibility and comprehensive training in the field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Edgar Zurif

Recently Published Articles