World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
3541
World Ranking
13737
National Ranking
536

Umar Qasim publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Umar Qasim sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 121 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Umar Qasim D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Umar Qasim sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Umar Qasim is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with significant contributions in the subfields of Plant Science and Agronomy and Crop Science.

Their work extensively covers topics related to Crop Yield and Soil Fertility, Genetics and Plant Breeding, and Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology. This thematic focus is evident in their recent publication record.

Among their recent papers is the study titled Selection criteria for the enhancement of nitrogen use efficiency in wheat using two step association analysis, published in 2025 in the journal Vegetos.

Umar Qasim collaborates frequently with other researchers, including:

  • Muhammad Amjad
  • Siddique Ahmad
  • Fahim Ullah Khan
  • R. Ullah
  • Iltaf Ullah

Their publications have appeared in the venue Vegetos, where they have contributed at least one paper.

This overview highlights their focus on improving crop genetics and soil management to support agricultural productivity through scientific research and collaboration.

Best Publications

  • Exploiting heuristic algorithms to efficiently utilize energy management controllers with renewable energy sources

    Sahar Rahim;Nadeem Javaid;Ashfaq Ahmad;Shahid Ahmed Khan

  • iAMCTD: improved adaptive mobility of courier nodes in threshold-optimized DBR protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks

    N. Javaid;M. R. Jafri;Z. A. Khan;U. Qasim

  • An Efficient Power Scheduling Scheme for Residential Load Management in Smart Homes

    Muhammad Babar Rasheed;Nadeem Javaid;Ashfaq Ahmad;Zahoor Ali Khan

  • $(ACH)^2$ : Routing Scheme to Maximize Lifetime and Throughput of Wireless Sensor Networks

    Ashfaq Ahmad;Nadeem Javaid;Zahoor Ali Khan;Umar Qasim

  • Realistic Scheduling Mechanism for Smart Homes

    Danish Mahmood;Nadeem Javaid;Nabil Alrajeh;Zahoor Ali Khan

  • RE-ATTEMPT: A New Energy-Efficient Routing Protocol for Wireless Body Area Sensor Networks

    Ashfaq Ahmad;Nadeem Javaid;Umar Qasim;Mohammad Ishfaq

  • Minimizing Electricity Theft Using Smart Meters in AMI

    M. Anas;N. Javaid;A. Mahmood;S.M. Raza

  • A Comprehensive Survey of MAC Protocols for Wireless Body Area Networks

    A. Rahim;N. Javaid;M. Aslam;Z. Rahman

  • Real Time Information Based Energy Management Using Customer Preferences and Dynamic Pricing in Smart Homes

    Muhammad Babar Rasheed;Nadeem Javaid;Muhammad Awais;Zahoor Ali Khan

  • Co-UWSN: cooperative energy-efficient protocol for underwater WSNs

    S. Ahmed;N. Javaid;F. A. Khan;M. Y. Durrani

  • Delay and energy consumption analysis of priority guaranteed MAC protocol for wireless body area networks

    Muhammad Babar Rasheed;Nadeem Javaid;Muhammad Imran;Zahoor Ali Khan

  • HEER: Hybrid Energy Efficient Reactive protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks

    N. Javaid;S. N. Mohammad;K. Latif;U. Qasim

  • LSTM and Bat-Based RUSBoost Approach for Electricity Theft Detection

    Muhammad Adil;Nadeem Javaid;Umar Qasim;Ibrar Ullah

  • Priority and delay constrained demand side management in real-time price environment with renewable energy source

    Muhammad Babar Rasheed;Nadeem Javaid;Ashfaq Ahmad;Muhammad Awais

  • ACH: Away cluster heads scheme for Energy Efficient Clustering Protocols in WSNs

    N. Javaid;M. Waseem;Z. A. Khan;U. Qasim

  • Delay-Sensitive routing schemes for underwater acoustic sensor networks

    N. Javaid;M. R. Jafri;S. Ahmed;M. Jamil

  • Density controlled divide-and-rule scheme for energy efficient routing in Wireless Sensor Networks

    A. Ahmad;K. Latif;N. Javaid;A. Khan

  • An Efficient Data-Gathering Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks.

    Nadeem Javaid;Naveed Ilyas;Ashfaq Ahmad;Nabil Ali Alrajeh

  • DEADS: Depth and Energy Aware Dominating Set Based Algorithm for Cooperative Routing along with Sink Mobility in Underwater WSNs

    Amara Umar;Nadeem Javaid;Ashfaq Ahmad;Zahoor Ali Khan

  • A Modified Feature Selection and Artificial Neural Network-Based Day-Ahead Load Forecasting Model for a Smart Grid

    Ashfaq Ahmad;Nadeem Javaid;Nabil Alrajeh;Zahoor Ali Khan

  • A Review on Demand Response: Pricing, Optimization, and Appliance Scheduling

    Ijaz Hussain;Sajjad Mohsin;Abdul Basit;Zahoor Ali Khan

  • CoDBR: Cooperative Depth Based Routing for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks

    H. Nasir;N. Javaid;H. Ashraf;S. Manzoor

  • An Incentive-based Optimal Energy Consumption Scheduling Algorithm for Residential Users

    Ihsan Ullah;Nadeem Javaid;Zahoor Ali Khan;Umar Qasim

  • AEDG: AUV-aided Efficient Data Gathering Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks☆

    Naveed Ilyas;Turki Ali Alghamdi;Muhammad Nauman Farooq;Bilal Mehboob

Frequent Co-Authors

Nadeem Javaid
Nadeem Javaid National Yunlin University of Science and Technology
Zahoor Ali Khan
Zahoor Ali Khan Higher Colleges of Technology
Nabil Alrajeh
Nabil Alrajeh King Saud University
Syed Hassan Ahmed
Syed Hassan Ahmed Georgia Southern University
Abid Khan
Abid Khan Aberystwyth University
Asad U. Khan
Asad U. Khan Aligarh Muslim University
Amjad Rehman
Amjad Rehman Prince Sultan University
Mohsen Guizani
Mohsen Guizani Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Atif M. Memon
Atif M. Memon University of Maryland, College Park
Naveed Ahmed Khan
Naveed Ahmed Khan University of Sharjah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of online degree options and career opportunities. If you’re considering a related field, there are several affordable and flexible online programs to explore.

For those interested in environmental impact and sustainability, check out what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree. This field combines science and technology to solve real-world challenges, with diverse career outcomes.

If you want to fast-track your education, consider a 2-year computer science degree online. Accelerated programs save time and help you enter the workforce or advance your skills sooner.

Engineering paths are also closely linked to computer science. Explore environmental engineering schools online for programs that integrate technology with environmental problem-solving. Additionally, students seeking affordability can review the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree for high-quality instruction without breaking the bank.

Whether your interests are in computing, sustainability, or engineering, these online pathways provide flexible options to launch or advance your tech career.

Best Scientists Citing Umar Qasim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles