World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 48 2334 2155 89 86 224 19629

María P. Martín publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by María P. Martín between 1970 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. María P. Martín published across 57 years, from 1970 to 2026, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2019. 3 of the 272 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2019. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications 2026: 1 publication
1970 2026

272 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
María P. Martín: publications per year, 1970 to 2026
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 2
1989 0
1990 1
1991 2
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 2
1999 5
2000 11
2001 8
2002 4
2003 9
2004 7
2005 8
2006 8
2007 6
2008 14
2009 10
2010 10
2011 9
2012 16
2013 17
2014 14
2015 13
2016 11
2017 9
2018 9
2019 25
2020 11
2021 6
2022 3
2023 12
2024 3
2025 2
2026 1
Total 272
Download as CSV

María P. Martín publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where María P. Martín sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–225 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 224 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61 224
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

María P. Martín D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where María P. Martín sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131 48
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Genus

María P. Martín mainly investigates Botany, Eucalyptus, Cape verde, Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus pellita. His Phylogenetics research extends to the thematically linked field of Botany. The study incorporates disciplines such as Aphanomyces invadans and Species complex, Phylogenetic tree in addition to Phylogenetics.

His work on Eucalyptus obliqua as part of general Eucalyptus research is frequently linked to Eucalyptus sieberi, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science. His work is dedicated to discovering how Taxon, Genetic diversity are connected with Computational biology and other disciplines. His work deals with themes such as Intergenic region, DNA sequencing, Sequence analysis and RefSeq, which intersect with Computational biology.

His most cited work include:

  • Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi (1732 citations)
  • Finding needles in haystacks: Linking scientific names, reference specimens and molecular data for Fungi (248 citations)
  • One fungus, which genes? Development and assessment of universal primers for potential secondary fungal DNA barcodes. (236 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Botany, Taxonomy, Phylogenetic tree, Zoology and Phylogenetics. He has researched Botany in several fields, including Monophyly and Internal transcribed spacer. María P. Martín is investigating Ribosomal RNA and Genetics as part of his examination of Internal transcribed spacer.

His Taxonomy research incorporates themes from Basidiomycota, Agaricomycetes and Corticioid fungi. His Phylogenetic tree research integrates issues from Evolutionary biology and Ecology. His Zoology study incorporates themes from Molecular phylogenetics and Ribosomal DNA.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (46.53%)
  • Taxonomy (25.74%)
  • Phylogenetic tree (18.32%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2020)?

  • Botany (46.53%)
  • Taxonomy (25.74%)
  • Phylogenetics (13.86%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

María P. Martín mostly deals with Botany, Taxonomy, Phylogenetics, Phylogenetic tree and Zoology. In his research, he undertakes multidisciplinary study on Botany and Cape verde. His research in Taxonomy intersects with topics in Basidiomycota, Intergenic region, Corticioid fungi and Internal transcribed spacer.

His research integrates issues of Basidiocarp, Ribosomal RNA, DNA barcoding and Genetic analysis in his study of Phylogenetics. His DNA barcoding research includes themes of Computational biology, Phallus, DNA and Ramaria. María P. Martín undertakes multidisciplinary investigations into Phylogenetic tree and Fungal genetics in his work.

Between 2014 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • One fungus, which genes? Development and assessment of universal primers for potential secondary fungal DNA barcodes. (236 citations)
  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 320–370 (117 citations)
  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 400–468 (102 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Genus

His primary areas of study are Botany, Eucalyptus, Eucalyptus globulus, Eucalyptus pellita and Cape verde. His Botany study frequently links to related topics such as Boletales. Within one scientific family, he focuses on topics pertaining to Plant litter under Eucalyptus, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Phyllosticta.

The Eucalyptus brassiana study combines topics in areas such as Eucalyptus pilularis, Acacia mangium, Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Eucalyptus gracilis and Corymbia citriodora. The various areas that he examines in his Entoloma study include Russula and Dothiorella. His study in Eucalyptus obliqua is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Eucalyptus maidenii, Eucalyptus tereticornis and Elaeocarpus.

Best Publications

  • Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi

    Conrad L. Schoch;Keith A. Seifert;Sabine Huhndorf;Vincent Robert

  • Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi

    Urmas Koljalg;Urmas Koljalg;R. Henrik Nilsson;Kessy Abarenkov;Leho Tedersoo

  • One fungus, which genes? Development and assessment of universal primers for potential secondary fungal DNA barcodes.

    J.B. Stielow;C.A. Lévesque;K.A. Seifert;W. Meyer

  • Finding needles in haystacks: Linking scientific names, reference specimens and molecular data for Fungi

    Conrad L. Schoch;Barbara Robbertse;Vincent Robert;Duong Vu

  • Fungal diversity notes 929–1035: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi

    Rungtiwa Phookamsak;Kevin D. Hyde;Rajesh Jeewon;D. Jayarama Bhat

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 469-557

    Pedro W. Crous;Pedro W. Crous;Michael J. Wingfield;Treena I. Burgess;G. E.St J. Hardy

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 400–468

    P. W. Crous;P. W. Crous;M. J. Wingfield;D. M. Richardson;J. J. Le Roux

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 320–370

    P. W. Crous;M. J. Wingfield;J. Guarro;M. Hernández-Restrepo

  • Fungal planet description sheets: 154-213

    P W Crous;M J Wingfield;J Guarro;R Cheewangkoon

  • Population structure of mycobionts and photobionts of the widespread lichen Cetraria aculeata

    F. Fernández-Mendoza;S. Domaschke;Miguel Ángel García García;P. Jordan

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 785–867

    P.W. Crous;J.J. Luangsa-ard;M.J. Wingfield;A.J. Carnegie

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 625-715

    P.W. Crous;M.J. Wingfield;T.I. Burgess;A.J. Carnegie

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 716-784.

    Pedro W. Crous;Michael J. Wingfield;T.I. Burgess;G.E.St.J. Hardy

  • Fungal planet description sheets: 868–950

    P.W. Crous;A.J. Carnegie;M.J. Wingfield;R. Sharma

  • Molecular Taxonomy of Phytopathogenic Fungi: A Case Study in Peronospora

    Markus Göker;Gema García-Blázquez;Hermann Voglmayr;M. Teresa Tellería

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 951–1041

    Crous Pw;Wingfield Mj;Lombard L;Roets F

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 558-624

    P.W. Crous;M.J. Wingfield;T.I. Burgess;G.E.St.J. Hardy

  • Molecular phylogeny suggests synonymy of Thelotremataceae within Graphidaceae (Ascomycota: Ostropales)

    Armin Mangold;María P. Martín;Robert Lücking;H. ThorstenLumbsch

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 1042-1111

    P. W. Crous;M. J. Wingfield;Y. H. Chooi;C. L. M. Gilchrist

  • Phylogenetic relationships among plant and animal parasites, and saprotrophs in Aphanomyces (Oomycetes)

    Javier Diéguez-Uribeondo;Miguel A. García;Lage Cerenius;Eva Kozubíková

  • Colletotrichum acutatum and C. gloeosporioides Cause Anthracnose on Olives

    M.P. Martín;F. García-Figueres

  • Fusarium solani is responsible for mass mortalities in nests of loggerhead sea turtle, Caretta caretta, in Boavista, Cape Verde.

    Jullie M. Sarmiento-Ramírez;Elena Abella;Elena Abella;María P. Martín;María T. Tellería

  • Honeycomb monoliths of activated carbons for effluent gas purification

    M. Yates;J. Blanco;P. Avila;M.P. Martin

  • ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pini’, a novel taxon from Pinus silvestris and Pinus halepensis

    Bernd Schneider;Ester Torres;María P. Martín;Manfred Schröder

  • Impact of wildfire return interval on the ectomycorrhizal resistant propagules communities of a Mediterranean open forest.

    Erika Buscardo;Susana Rodríguez-Echeverría;María P. Martín;Paolo De Angelis

  • Global distribution of two fungal pathogens threatening endangered sea turtles.

    Jullie M. Sarmiento-Ramírez;Elena Abella-Pérez;Andrea D. Phillott;Jolene Sim

Frequent Co-Authors

Pedro W. Crous
Pedro W. Crous Utrecht University
Michael J. Wingfield
Michael J. Wingfield University of Pretoria
Johannes Z. Groenewald
Johannes Z. Groenewald Utrecht University
Josep Guarro
Josep Guarro Rovira i Virgili University
H. Thorsten Lumbsch
H. Thorsten Lumbsch Field Museum of Natural History
Lourdes Fañanás
Lourdes Fañanás University of Barcelona
Josepa Gené
Josepa Gené Rovira i Virgili University
Lorenzo Lombard
Lorenzo Lombard Utrecht University
Alfredo Vizzini
Alfredo Vizzini University of Turin
Treena I. Burgess
Treena I. Burgess Murdoch University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing María P. Martín

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles