World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
48
Citations
19629
World Ranking
2334
National Ranking
89

María P. Martín publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where María P. Martín sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 224 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

María P. Martín D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where María P. Martín sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Genus

María P. Martín mainly investigates Botany, Eucalyptus, Cape verde, Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus pellita. His Phylogenetics research extends to the thematically linked field of Botany. The study incorporates disciplines such as Aphanomyces invadans and Species complex, Phylogenetic tree in addition to Phylogenetics.

His work on Eucalyptus obliqua as part of general Eucalyptus research is frequently linked to Eucalyptus sieberi, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science. His work is dedicated to discovering how Taxon, Genetic diversity are connected with Computational biology and other disciplines. His work deals with themes such as Intergenic region, DNA sequencing, Sequence analysis and RefSeq, which intersect with Computational biology.

His most cited work include:

  • Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi (1732 citations)
  • Finding needles in haystacks: Linking scientific names, reference specimens and molecular data for Fungi (248 citations)
  • One fungus, which genes? Development and assessment of universal primers for potential secondary fungal DNA barcodes. (236 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Botany, Taxonomy, Phylogenetic tree, Zoology and Phylogenetics. He has researched Botany in several fields, including Monophyly and Internal transcribed spacer. María P. Martín is investigating Ribosomal RNA and Genetics as part of his examination of Internal transcribed spacer.

His Taxonomy research incorporates themes from Basidiomycota, Agaricomycetes and Corticioid fungi. His Phylogenetic tree research integrates issues from Evolutionary biology and Ecology. His Zoology study incorporates themes from Molecular phylogenetics and Ribosomal DNA.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (46.53%)
  • Taxonomy (25.74%)
  • Phylogenetic tree (18.32%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2020)?

  • Botany (46.53%)
  • Taxonomy (25.74%)
  • Phylogenetics (13.86%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

María P. Martín mostly deals with Botany, Taxonomy, Phylogenetics, Phylogenetic tree and Zoology. In his research, he undertakes multidisciplinary study on Botany and Cape verde. His research in Taxonomy intersects with topics in Basidiomycota, Intergenic region, Corticioid fungi and Internal transcribed spacer.

His research integrates issues of Basidiocarp, Ribosomal RNA, DNA barcoding and Genetic analysis in his study of Phylogenetics. His DNA barcoding research includes themes of Computational biology, Phallus, DNA and Ramaria. María P. Martín undertakes multidisciplinary investigations into Phylogenetic tree and Fungal genetics in his work.

Between 2014 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • One fungus, which genes? Development and assessment of universal primers for potential secondary fungal DNA barcodes. (236 citations)
  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 320–370 (117 citations)
  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 400–468 (102 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Genus

His primary areas of study are Botany, Eucalyptus, Eucalyptus globulus, Eucalyptus pellita and Cape verde. His Botany study frequently links to related topics such as Boletales. Within one scientific family, he focuses on topics pertaining to Plant litter under Eucalyptus, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Phyllosticta.

The Eucalyptus brassiana study combines topics in areas such as Eucalyptus pilularis, Acacia mangium, Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Eucalyptus gracilis and Corymbia citriodora. The various areas that he examines in his Entoloma study include Russula and Dothiorella. His study in Eucalyptus obliqua is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Eucalyptus maidenii, Eucalyptus tereticornis and Elaeocarpus.

Best Publications

  • Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi

    Conrad L. Schoch;Keith A. Seifert;Sabine Huhndorf;Vincent Robert

  • Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi

    Urmas Koljalg;Urmas Koljalg;R. Henrik Nilsson;Kessy Abarenkov;Leho Tedersoo

  • One fungus, which genes? Development and assessment of universal primers for potential secondary fungal DNA barcodes.

    J.B. Stielow;C.A. Lévesque;K.A. Seifert;W. Meyer

  • Finding needles in haystacks: Linking scientific names, reference specimens and molecular data for Fungi

    Conrad L. Schoch;Barbara Robbertse;Vincent Robert;Duong Vu

  • Fungal diversity notes 929–1035: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi

    Rungtiwa Phookamsak;Kevin D. Hyde;Rajesh Jeewon;D. Jayarama Bhat

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 469-557

    Pedro W. Crous;Pedro W. Crous;Michael J. Wingfield;Treena I. Burgess;G. E.St J. Hardy

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 400–468

    P. W. Crous;P. W. Crous;M. J. Wingfield;D. M. Richardson;J. J. Le Roux

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 320–370

    P. W. Crous;M. J. Wingfield;J. Guarro;M. Hernández-Restrepo

  • Fungal planet description sheets: 154-213

    P W Crous;M J Wingfield;J Guarro;R Cheewangkoon

  • Population structure of mycobionts and photobionts of the widespread lichen Cetraria aculeata

    F. Fernández-Mendoza;S. Domaschke;Miguel Ángel García García;P. Jordan

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 785–867

    P.W. Crous;J.J. Luangsa-ard;M.J. Wingfield;A.J. Carnegie

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 625-715

    P.W. Crous;M.J. Wingfield;T.I. Burgess;A.J. Carnegie

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 716-784.

    Pedro W. Crous;Michael J. Wingfield;T.I. Burgess;G.E.St.J. Hardy

  • Fungal planet description sheets: 868–950

    P.W. Crous;A.J. Carnegie;M.J. Wingfield;R. Sharma

  • Molecular Taxonomy of Phytopathogenic Fungi: A Case Study in Peronospora

    Markus Göker;Gema García-Blázquez;Hermann Voglmayr;M. Teresa Tellería

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 951–1041

    Crous Pw;Wingfield Mj;Lombard L;Roets F

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 558-624

    P.W. Crous;M.J. Wingfield;T.I. Burgess;G.E.St.J. Hardy

  • Molecular phylogeny suggests synonymy of Thelotremataceae within Graphidaceae (Ascomycota: Ostropales)

    Armin Mangold;María P. Martín;Robert Lücking;H. ThorstenLumbsch

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 1042-1111

    P. W. Crous;M. J. Wingfield;Y. H. Chooi;C. L. M. Gilchrist

  • Phylogenetic relationships among plant and animal parasites, and saprotrophs in Aphanomyces (Oomycetes)

    Javier Diéguez-Uribeondo;Miguel A. García;Lage Cerenius;Eva Kozubíková

  • Colletotrichum acutatum and C. gloeosporioides Cause Anthracnose on Olives

    M.P. Martín;F. García-Figueres

  • Fusarium solani is responsible for mass mortalities in nests of loggerhead sea turtle, Caretta caretta, in Boavista, Cape Verde.

    Jullie M. Sarmiento-Ramírez;Elena Abella;Elena Abella;María P. Martín;María T. Tellería

  • Honeycomb monoliths of activated carbons for effluent gas purification

    M. Yates;J. Blanco;P. Avila;M.P. Martin

  • ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pini’, a novel taxon from Pinus silvestris and Pinus halepensis

    Bernd Schneider;Ester Torres;María P. Martín;Manfred Schröder

  • Impact of wildfire return interval on the ectomycorrhizal resistant propagules communities of a Mediterranean open forest.

    Erika Buscardo;Susana Rodríguez-Echeverría;María P. Martín;Paolo De Angelis

  • Global distribution of two fungal pathogens threatening endangered sea turtles.

    Jullie M. Sarmiento-Ramírez;Elena Abella-Pérez;Andrea D. Phillott;Jolene Sim

Frequent Co-Authors

Pedro W. Crous
Pedro W. Crous Utrecht University
Michael J. Wingfield
Michael J. Wingfield University of Pretoria
Johannes Z. Groenewald
Johannes Z. Groenewald Utrecht University
Josep Guarro
Josep Guarro Rovira i Virgili University
H. Thorsten Lumbsch
H. Thorsten Lumbsch Field Museum of Natural History
Lourdes Fañanás
Lourdes Fañanás University of Barcelona
Josepa Gené
Josepa Gené Rovira i Virgili University
Lorenzo Lombard
Lorenzo Lombard Utrecht University
Alfredo Vizzini
Alfredo Vizzini University of Turin
Treena I. Burgess
Treena I. Burgess Murdoch University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing María P. Martín

Trending Scientists