World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 42 8497 8258 33 33 118 6177

Nabil Alrajeh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nabil Alrajeh between 2011 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nabil Alrajeh published across 16 years, from 2011 to 2026, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2013. 12 of the 140 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2013. 2011: 1 publication 2012: 14 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
2011 2026

140 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nabil Alrajeh: publications per year, 2011 to 2026
Year Publications
2011 1
2012 14
2013 15
2014 3
2015 9
2016 14
2017 13
2018 8
2019 2
2020 7
2021 11
2022 6
2023 10
2024 15
2025 11
2026 1
Total 140
Download as CSV

Nabil Alrajeh publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nabil Alrajeh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 112–121 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 118 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497 118
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Nabil Alrajeh D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nabil Alrajeh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821 42
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nabil Alrajeh is affiliated with King Saud University in Saudi Arabia and has an extensive publication record in the fields of computer science and engineering. Their research largely focuses on areas intersecting artificial intelligence, computer networks, and health information management.

The main fields of study for Alrajeh are:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Their work delves into various subfields, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Health Information Management
  • Information Systems

Alrajeh's research topics cover a spectrum of applications and techniques such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Electricity Theft Detection Techniques
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Smart Grid Security and Resilience

The scientist has published multiple papers in the following venues:

  • IEEE Access
  • Applied Sciences
  • Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience
  • Healthcare
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Among recent papers by Alrajeh, notable titles include:

  • Secure and Provenance Enhanced Internet of Health Things Framework: A Blockchain Managed Federated Learning Approach (2020, IEEE Access)
  • Adversarial Examples-Security Threats to COVID-19 Deep Learning Systems in Medical IoT Devices (2020, IEEE Internet of Things Journal)
  • B5G and Explainable Deep Learning Assisted Healthcare Vertical at the Edge: COVID-I9 Perspective (2020, IEEE Network)
  • Blockchain-Based Secure Data Storage for Distributed Vehicular Networks (2020, Applied Sciences)
  • Towards Sustainable Energy Efficiency With Intelligent Electricity Theft Detection in Smart Grids Emphasising Enhanced Neural Networks (2021, IEEE Access)

Frequent collaborators in Alrajeh's research include:

  • Nadeem Javaid
  • Abdulaziz Aldegheishem
  • Safdar Hussain Bouk
  • Muhammad Aslam
  • Md. Abdur Rahman

Best Publications

  • Exploiting heuristic algorithms to efficiently utilize energy management controllers with renewable energy sources

    Sahar Rahim;Nadeem Javaid;Ashfaq Ahmad;Shahid Ahmed Khan

  • M-ATTEMPT: A New Energy-Efficient Routing Protocol for Wireless Body Area Sensor Networks

    Nadeem Javaid;Z. Abbas;M. S. Fareed;Zahoor Ali Khan

  • Localization Techniques in Wireless Sensor Networks

    Nabil Ali Alrajeh;Maryam Bashir;Bilal Shams

  • Secure and Provenance Enhanced Internet of Health Things Framework: A Blockchain Managed Federated Learning Approach

    Mohamed Abdur Rahman;M. Shamim Hossain;Mohammad Saiful Islam;Nabil A. Alrajeh

  • Intrusion Detection Systems in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Review:

    Nabil Ali Alrajeh;Shafiullah Khan;Bilal Shams

  • An Intelligent Load Management System With Renewable Energy Integration for Smart Homes

    Nadeem Javaid;Ihsan Ullah;Mariam Akbar;Zafar Iqbal

  • Adversarial Examples—Security Threats to COVID-19 Deep Learning Systems in Medical IoT Devices

    Abdur Rahman;M. Shamim Hossain;Nabil A. Alrajeh;Fawaz Alsolami

  • Energy Efficient Integration of Renewable Energy Sources in the Smart Grid for Demand Side Management

    Nadeem Javaid;Ghulam Hafeez;Sohail Iqbal;Nabil Alrajeh

  • Wireless Sensor Networks: Current Status and Future Trends

    Shafiullah Khan;Al-Sakib Khan Pathan;Nabil Ali Alrajeh

  • An Accurate and Fast Converging Short-Term Load Forecasting Model for Industrial Applications in a Smart Grid

    Ashfaq Ahmad;Nadeem Javaid;Mohsen Guizani;Nabil Alrajeh

  • An Efficient Power Scheduling Scheme for Residential Load Management in Smart Homes

    Muhammad Babar Rasheed;Nadeem Javaid;Ashfaq Ahmad;Zahoor Ali Khan

  • A new heuristically optimized Home Energy Management controller for smart grid

    Nadeem Javaid;Mudassar Naseem;Muhammad Babar Rasheed;Danish Mahmood

  • A generic demand-side management model for smart grid

    Muhammad Asghar Khan;Nadeem Javaid;Anzar Mahmood;Zahoor Ali Khan

  • Realistic Scheduling Mechanism for Smart Homes

    Danish Mahmood;Nadeem Javaid;Nabil Alrajeh;Zahoor Ali Khan

  • Intrusion Detection Systems Based on Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Wireless Sensor Networks

    Nabil Ali Alrajeh;Jaime Lloret

  • On Energy Hole and Coverage Hole Avoidance in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks

    Kamran Latif;Nadeem Javaid;Ashfaq Ahmad;Zahoor Ali Khan

  • Towards Optimization of Metaheuristic Algorithms for IoT Enabled Smart Homes Targeting Balanced Demand and Supply of Energy

    Saqib Kazmi;Nadeem Javaid;Muhammad Junaid Mughal;Mariam Akbar

  • B5G and Explainable Deep Learning Assisted Healthcare Vertical at the Edge: COVID-I9 Perspective

    Md. Abdur Rahman;M. Shamim Hossain;Nabil A. Alrajeh;Nadra Guizani

  • Co-LAEEBA

    S. Ahmed;N. Javaid;S. Yousaf;A. Ahmad

  • Blockchain-Based Secure Data Storage for Distributed Vehicular Networks

    Muhammad Umar Javed;Mubariz Rehman;Nadeem Javaid;Abdulaziz Aldegheishem

  • Real Time Information Based Energy Management Using Customer Preferences and Dynamic Pricing in Smart Homes

    Muhammad Babar Rasheed;Nadeem Javaid;Muhammad Awais;Zahoor Ali Khan

Frequent Co-Authors

Nadeem Javaid
Nadeem Javaid National Yunlin University of Science and Technology
Zahoor Ali Khan
Zahoor Ali Khan Higher Colleges of Technology
Umar Qasim
Umar Qasim University of Alberta
Ezio Biglieri
Ezio Biglieri Pompeu Fabra University
M. Shamim Hossain
M. Shamim Hossain King Saud University
Jaime Lloret
Jaime Lloret Universitat Politècnica de València
Angel Lozano
Angel Lozano Pompeu Fabra University
Nadra Guizani
Nadra Guizani The University of Texas at Arlington
Yi-Bing Lin
Yi-Bing Lin National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Mohsen Guizani
Mohsen Guizani Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Computer Science in the USA but have concerns about academic requirements, consider exploring online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa. Many reputable programs offer flexible admission policies, making it easier to start your education journey.

For those seeking a fast track, a 2-year computer science degree online can accelerate your progress into the workforce. These accelerated options are perfect if you want a quicker path to tech careers.

Beyond computer science, there are also growing career opportunities in environmental fields. Take a look at what’s possible with an environmental science degree, which opens doors to roles in sustainability, research, and environmental policy.

If affordability is a concern, you might find the cheapest online environmental science degree programs ideal. These options can help minimize your college expenses while still providing a quality education.

Best Scientists Citing Nabil Alrajeh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles