World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
17171
World Ranking
8363
National Ranking
4456

Martin L. Maehr publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin L. Maehr sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 93 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Martin L. Maehr D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin L. Maehr sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin L. Maehr was affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States during their academic career. Their work contributed to the scholarly community in various capacities, although detailed records of specific research papers or publication venues were not documented.

Throughout their career, Maehr did not have frequently listed co-authors or recurring publication venues in available academic databases, which may indicate a more solitary or diverse publication pattern rather than repeated collaborations or concentration in a particular journal or conference series.

Their research did not show a distinct concentration on particular fields, subfields, or main topics of study in the records available. This suggests either interdisciplinary engagement or that specific areas of focus were not extensively cataloged.

Information about book publications or awards related to Maehr's work is not present in the accessible data, which limits the scope of documented achievements or recognitions within formal records.

Despite the limited documentation of specific outputs, Maehr's connection to a major research institution like the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor situates them within a significant academic environment, likely engaging in research activities relevant to their discipline during their tenure.

Best Publications

  • Motivation and Schooling in the Middle Grades

    Eric M. Anderman;Martin L. Maehr

  • The Contributions and Prospects of Goal Orientation Theory.

    Avi Kaplan;Martin L. Maehr

  • The Development and Validation of Scales Assessing Students' Achievement Goal Orientations

    Carol Midgley;Avi Kaplan;Michael Middleton;Martin L. Maehr

  • Enhancing Student Motivation: A Schoolwide Approach

    Martin L. Maehr;Carol Midgley

  • Beyond a Two-Goal Theory of Motivation and Achievement: A Case for Social Goals

    Timothy C. Urdan;Martin L. Maehr

  • Achievement Goals and Student Well-Being.

    Avi Kaplan;Martin L. Maehr

  • Declining Motivation After the Transition to Middle School: Schools Can Make a Difference.

    Eric M. Anderman;Martin L. Maehr;Carol Midgley

  • Transforming School Cultures

    Martin L. Maehr;Carol Midgley

  • The motivation factor: A theory of personal investment.

    Martin L. Maehr;Larry A. Braskamp

  • Achievement goal theory: The past, present, and future.

    Martin L. Maehr;Akane Zusho

  • The development of achievement motivation

    Martin L. Maehr;John G. Nicholls

  • Understanding Motivation and Schooling: Where We've Been, Where We Are, and Where We Need to Go

    Martin L. Maehr;Heather A. Meyer

  • Reinventing Schools for Early Adolescents: Emphasizing Task Goals.

    Martin L. Maehr;Eric M. Anderman

  • Continuing Motivation: An Analysis of a Seldom Considered Educational Outcome

    Martin L. Maehr

  • Culture and achievement motivation

    Martin L. Maehr

  • Affect, Ability, and Science Achievement: A Quantitative Synthesis of Correlational Research

    Marjorie W. Steinkamp;Martin L. Maehr

  • Gender Differences in Motivational Orientations Toward Achievement in School Science: A Quantitative Synthesis

    Marjorie W Steinkamp;Martin L Maehr

  • Freedom from External Evaluation.

    Martin L. Maehr;William M. Stallings

  • Enhancing the Motivation of African American Students: An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective.

    Avi Kaplan;Martin L. Maehr

  • Clarifying Misconceptions and Misrepresentations in Achievement Goal Research in Sport: A Response to Harwood, Hardy, and Swain.

    Darren C. Treasure;Joan L. Duda;Howard K. Hall;Glyn C. Roberts

  • Motivating students, improving schools : the legacy of Carol Midgley

    Paul R Pintrich;Martin L. Maehr

Frequent Co-Authors

Carol Midgley
Carol Midgley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Avi Kaplan
Avi Kaplan Temple University
Eric M. Anderman
Eric M. Anderman The Ohio State University
Tim Urdan
Tim Urdan Santa Clara University
Paul R. Pintrich
Paul R. Pintrich University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert W. Roeser
Robert W. Roeser Pennsylvania State University
Dennis M. McInerney
Dennis M. McInerney Education University of Hong Kong
Glyn C. Roberts
Glyn C. Roberts Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
Howard Hall
Howard Hall York St John University
Joan L. Duda
Joan L. Duda University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online psychology degree is increasingly popular among students seeking flexibility and affordability. Many universities across the USA now offer online programs designed for both traditional students and working adults. As you consider your options, cost is an important factor. Thankfully, prospective students can find information about the cheapest online psychology degrees in Texas, making quality education more accessible.

Besides Texas, several other regions provide budget-friendly choices. For example, there are affordable psychology programs in Bethlehem and affordable psychology degrees in Boca Raton for students seeking low-cost alternatives in Pennsylvania or Florida.

Boston also boasts a range of affordable psychology programs in Boston that can help students launch their psychology careers without excessive student debt. Graduates from these affordable online programs can pursue careers in mental health services, human resources, counseling, research, and education, making psychology a versatile and rewarding field.

Best Scientists Citing Martin L. Maehr

Recently Published Articles