World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
20728
World Ranking
19385
National Ranking
9653

Stephen J. McPhee publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. McPhee sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 232 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stephen J. McPhee D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. McPhee sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen J. McPhee is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and social sciences, with a particular focus on public health, environmental and occupational health, health disparities, and migration-related topics.

The scholar's recent publication record includes studies examining health behaviors and outcomes among immigrant populations. Notable papers include:

  • A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of a Lay Health Worker Intervention to Increase Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Among Vietnamese Americans, 2020, published in Preventing Chronic Disease
  • Neighborhood Ethnic Composition and Self-rated Health Among Chinese and Vietnamese American Immigrants, 2020, featured in the Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

Stephen J. McPhee has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Susan L. Stewart
  • Jane Jih
  • Thien-Nhien Luong
  • Tung T. Nguyen
  • Bang H. Nguyen

Their work has been published primarily in the following venues:

  • Preventing Chronic Disease
  • Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

The main fields of study for this researcher are Medicine and Social Sciences, with specific subfields being Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Clinical Psychology, and Sociology and Political Science.

Key topics addressed in their research include:

  • Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Migration and Labor Dynamics

Best Publications

  • Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment

    Lawrence M. Tierney;Stephen J. McPhee;Maxine A. Papadakis

  • Do house officers learn from their mistakes

    A W Wu;S Folkman;S J McPhee;B Lo

  • The comprehensive care team: a controlled trial of outpatient palliative medicine consultation.

    Michael W. Rabow;Suzanne L. Dibble;Steven Z. Pantilat;Stephen J. McPhee

  • Current Medical Diagnosis & Treatment

    Lawrence M.tierney;Stephen J.Mcphee;Maxine A.Papadakis

  • To tell the truth : Ethical and practical issues in disclosing medical mistakes to patients

    Albert W. Wu;Thomas A. Cavanaugh;Stephen J. McPhee;Bernard Lo

  • Pathophysiology of Disease: An Introduction to Clinical Medicine

    Stephen J. McPhee

  • Impact of Automated Calls With Nurse Follow-Up on Diabetes Treatment Outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System A randomized controlled trial

    John D. Piette;Morris Weinberger;Frederic B. Kraemer;Frederic B. Kraemer;Stephen J. McPhee

  • Of principles and pens: attitudes and practices of medicine housestaff toward pharmaceutical industry promotions

    Michael A. Steinman;Michael G. Shlipak;Stephen J. McPhee;Stephen J. McPhee

  • Misconceptions About Cancer Among Latinos and Anglos

    Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable;Fabio Sabogal;Regina Otero-Sabogal;Robert A. Hiatt

  • Do automated calls with nurse follow-up improve self-care and glycemic control among vulnerable patients with diabetes?

    John D Piette;John D Piette;Morris Weinberger;Stephen J McPhee;Connie A Mah

  • Does quality influence choice of hospital

    Harold S. Luft;Deborah W. Garnick;David H. Mark;Deborah J. Peltzman

  • The effect of automated calls with telephone nurse follow-up on patient-centered outcomes of diabetes care: a randomized, controlled trial.

    John D. Piette;Morris Weinberger;Morris Weinberger;Stephen J. McPhee

  • Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians. Results of a randomized, controlled trial.

    Stephen J. McPhee;Joyce Adair Bird;Don Fordham;Jonathan E. Rodnick

  • Promoting cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial of three interventions.

    Stephen J. McPhee;Joyce Adair Bird;Christopher N. H. Jenkins;Don Fordham

  • Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice: comparison with the 1980 American Cancer Society Guidelines.

    Stephen J. McPhee;Robert J. Richard;Sharon N. Solkowitz

  • Primary care physicians and AIDS. Attitudinal and structural barriers to care

    Barbara Gerbert;Bryan T. Maguire;Thomas Bleecker;Thomas J. Coates

  • A Systems Model of Clinical Preventive Care: An Analysis of Factors Influencing Patient and Physician:

    Judith M. E. Walsh;Stephen J. McPhee

  • The role of specialized clinical services in competition among hospitals.

    Harold S Luft;James C Robinson;Deborah W Garnick;Susan C Maerki

  • Beyond breaking bad news: how to help patients who suffer.

    M W Rabow;S J McPhee

  • The impact of clinical pharmacists' consultations on physicians' geriatric drug prescribing. A randomized controlled trial.

    Helene Levens Lipton;Lisa Anne Bero;Joyce Adair Bird;Stephen J. McPhee

Frequent Co-Authors

Harold S. Luft
Harold S. Luft Palo Alto Medical Foundation
Bernard Lo
Bernard Lo University of California, San Francisco
Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable
Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable National Institutes of Health
James C. Robinson
James C. Robinson University of California, Berkeley
Morris Weinberger
Morris Weinberger University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Albert W. Wu
Albert W. Wu Johns Hopkins University
Susan Folkman
Susan Folkman University of California, San Francisco
Erik Lichtenberg
Erik Lichtenberg University of Maryland, College Park
Robert A. Hiatt
Robert A. Hiatt University of California, San Francisco
Roshan Bastani
Roshan Bastani University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical education in the USA opens doors to various online programs that can fast-track your healthcare career. For those interested in advanced clinical roles, online nurse practitioner programs offer flexibility and in-depth training, allowing working nurses to specialize and take on leadership positions.

If you’re looking for a quicker path to a nursing degree, consider enrolling in cheapest online accelerated bsn programs. These accelerated options are designed for those who already hold a bachelor’s degree in another field and wish to transition into nursing efficiently.

Advancement and research roles often require a terminal degree. Today, online phd nursing programs make it possible for professionals to earn a doctorate without sacrificing work commitments.

Additionally, registered nurses seeking to expand their qualifications can benefit from the cheapest rn to bsn online programs available. Each pathway offers unique opportunities to shape your healthcare career and meet growing industry demands.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen J. McPhee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles