World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
24487
World Ranking
19045
National Ranking
9494

Clement J. McDonald publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clement J. McDonald sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 326 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Clement J. McDonald D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clement J. McDonald sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Clement J. McDonald is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research spans various areas predominantly within the broad field of Medicine, with specialization across several subfields including Infectious Diseases, Neurology, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, notably Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, Electronic Health Records Systems, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, Healthcare Policy and Management, Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments, and Estrogen and related hormone effects.

Among the recent publications by Clement J. McDonald are:

  • Prevalence and characteristics of long COVID in elderly patients: An observational cohort study of over 2 million adults in the US, 2023, PLoS Medicine
  • Designing, Conducting, and Reporting Clinical Decision Support Studies: Recommendations and Call to Action, 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Association between tendon ruptures and use of fluoroquinolone, and other oral antibiotics: a 10-year retrospective study of 1 million US senior Medicare beneficiaries, 2020, BMJ Open
  • Nirmatrelvir and Molnupiravir and Post-COVID-19 Condition in Older Patients, 2023, JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Use of menopausal hormone therapy beyond age 65 years and its effects on women's health outcomes by types, routes, and doses, 2024, Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society, PLoS ONE, UNC Libraries, and PLoS Medicine.

Frequent co-authors of Clement J. McDonald include Seo Hyon Baik, Fitsum Baye, Kin Wah Fung, ZhaoNian Zheng, and Vojtech Huser.

Best Publications

  • Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man.

    Clement J. McDonald

  • Preparing a collection of radiology examinations for distribution and retrieval

    Dina Demner-Fushman;Marc D. Kohli;Marc B. Rosenman;Sonya E. Shooshan

  • Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial.

    Clement J. McDONALD;Siu L. Hui;David M. Smith;William M. Tierney

  • Methodological Review: What can natural language processing do for clinical decision support?

    Dina Demner-Fushman;Wendy W. Chapman;Clement J. McDonald

  • Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization.

    William M. Tierney;Michael E. Miller;J. Marc Overhage;Clement J. McDonald;Clement J. McDonald

  • Automatic Tuberculosis Screening Using Chest Radiographs

    Stefan Jaeger;Alexandros Karargyris;Sema Candemir;Les Folio

  • Lung Segmentation in Chest Radiographs Using Anatomical Atlases With Nonrigid Registration

    Sema Candemir;Stefan Jaeger;Kannappan Palaniappan;Jonathan P. Musco

  • A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients.

    Paul R. Dexter;Susan Perkins;J. Marc Overhage;J. Marc Overhage;Kati Maharry

  • LOINC, a Universal Standard for Identifying Laboratory Observations: A 5-Year Update

    Clement J. McDonald;Stanley M. Huff;Jeffrey G. Suico;Jeffrey G. Suico;Gilbert Hill

  • The Barriers to Electronic Medical Record Systems and How to Overcome Them

    Clement J. McDonald

  • The Effect on Test Ordering of Informing Physicians of the Charges for Outpatient Diagnostic Tests

    William M. Tierney;Michael E. Miller;Michael E. Miller;Clement J. McDonald;Clement J. McDonald

  • A randomized trial of "corollary orders" to prevent errors of omission.

    J. Marc Overhage;William M. Tierney;Xiao Hua Zhou;Clement J. McDonald

  • Deaths due to medical errors are exaggerated in Institute of Medicine report.

    Clement J. McDonald;Michael Weiner;Siu L. Hui

  • The Regenstrief Medical Record System: a quarter century experience

    Clement J. McDonald;J. Marc Overhage;William M. Tierney;Paul R. Dexter

  • Delayed feedback of physician performance versus immediate reminders to perform preventive care. Effects on physician compliance.

    William M. Tierney;Siu L. Hui;Clement J. McDonald;Clement J. McDonald

  • The Indiana Network For Patient Care: A Working Local Health Information Infrastructure

    Clement J. McDonald;J. Marc Overhage;Michael Barnes;Gunther Schadow

  • Controlled Trial of Direct Physician Order Entry: Effects on Physicians' Time Utilization in Ambulatory Primary Care Internal Medicine Practices

    J. M. Overhage;Susan Perkins;W. M. Tierney;C. J. McDonald

  • Development of the Logical Observation Identifier Names and Codes (LOINC) Vocabulary

    Stanley M. Huff;Roberto A. Rocha;Clement J. McDonald;Georges J. E. De Moor

  • The Regenstrief Medical Record System: 20 years of experience in hospitals, clinics, and neighborhood health centers.

    C. J. McDonald;W. M. Tierney;J. M. Overhage;Douglas Martin

  • Computer-Stored Medical Records: Their Future Role in Medical Practice

    Clement J. McDonald;William M. Tierney

Frequent Co-Authors

William M. Tierney
William M. Tierney The University of Texas at Austin
Morris Weinberger
Morris Weinberger University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Dina Demner-Fushman
Dina Demner-Fushman National Institutes of Health
Christopher M. Callahan
Christopher M. Callahan Indiana University
Robin M. Murray
Robin M. Murray King's College London
Fredric D. Wolinsky
Fredric D. Wolinsky University of Iowa
Sameer Antani
Sameer Antani National Institutes of Health
Stanley M. Huff
Stanley M. Huff University of Utah
Elvira Bramon
Elvira Bramon University College London
Robin G. Morris
Robin G. Morris King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their healthcare careers or exploring alternative routes into medicine, several flexible online degree programs are available. Many choose graduate-level nursing programs as a streamlined path to advanced roles.

If you’re seeking a time-saving option, consider short dnp programs. These accelerated pathways enable experienced nurses to attain a Doctor of Nursing Practice and leadership roles faster than traditional tracks.

Those who wish to avoid extensive research or writing might explore online dnp programs without dissertation. These programs focus on practical skills and clinical expertise rather than academic research, making them popular among working professionals.

Individuals aiming to enter the workforce quickly can opt for an lpn accelerated program. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) fast-track programs are ideal for those looking to begin their nursing careers in a shorter timeframe.

For those interested in mental health, specialized programs like psych np online programs offer a focused curriculum to quickly become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner.

By pursuing these online options, students and professionals can accelerate their education and gain qualifications for high-demand roles in medicine and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Clement J. McDonald

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles