World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
62
Citations
9154
World Ranking
3591
National Ranking
1657

James R. Bloedel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James R. Bloedel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 130 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James R. Bloedel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James R. Bloedel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

James R. Bloedel is affiliated with the Barrow Neurological Institute in the United States. The focus of their scientific career is centered around neurological research within this institution, contributing to advancements in the understanding of brain and nervous system functions.

Throughout their career, James R. Bloedel has not been associated with any specifically noted recent publications or listed frequent co-authors. There are no records of works published in recurring scientific venues or venues with multiple publications attributed to them.

There is limited publicly available information regarding Bloedel's specific fields of study or subfields within neuroscience or related disciplines. Similarly, no main research topics have been formally documented or cataloged in the available data.

The academic profile does not include any book publications or contributions to scientific literature through books. No awards or honors have been recorded in association with their name.

The absence of detailed bibliographic data and collaborative records suggests either a focus on less documented or emerging research areas or a preference for research activities outside widely indexed journals and conferences.

James R. Bloedel is currently active and is not deceased. Their ongoing affiliation with a known neurological institute indicates continued participation in scientific or clinical research activities within the neuroscience domain.

Best Publications

  • Disorders of the cerebellum

    Sid Gilman;James R. Bloedel;Richard Lechtenberg

  • Functional heterogeneity with structural homogeneity: How does the cerebellum operate?

    James R. Bloedel

  • Action of climbing fibers in cerebellar cortex of the cat.

    Unknown

  • Increase in Purkinje cell gain associated with naturally activated climbing fiber input

    T. J. Ebner;Q. X. Yu;J. R. Bloedel

  • Cerebellar Afferent Systems

    James R. Bloedel;Jacques Courville

  • On the cerebellum, cutaneomuscular reflexes, movement control and the elusive engrams of memory

    James R. Bloedel;Vlastislav Bracha

  • The Acquisition of Motor Behavior in Vertebrates

    James R Bloedel;Timothy J Ebner;Steven P Wise

  • Climbing fiber action on the responsiveness of Purkinje cells to parallel fiber inputs

    Timothy J. Ebner;James R. Bloedel

  • Anatomical and physiological evidence for a cerebellar nucleo-cortical projection in the cat.

    D.L. Tolbert;H. Bantli;J.R. Bloedel

  • Effects of stimulating in raphe nuclei and in reticular formation on response of spinothalamic neurons to mechanical stimuli.

    D. B. McCreery;J. R. Bloedel;E. G. Hames

  • Coordinate transformation and limb movements: There may be more complexity than meets the eye

    James R. Bloedel

  • Classical conditioning of the eyeblink reflex in the decerebrate-decerebellate rabbit.

    Thomas M. Kelly;Thomas M. Kelly;Cheng-Ci Zuo;Cheng-Ci Zuo;James R. Bloedel;James R. Bloedel

  • Relationships between simultaneously recorded Purkinje cells and nuclear neurons.

    Christopher J. McDevitt;Timothy J. Ebner;James R. Bloedel

  • Organizational features of the cat and monkey cerebellar nucleocortical projection.

    Daniel L. Tolbert;Heinrich Bantli;James R. Bloedel

  • Role of climbing fiber afferent input in determining responsiveness of Purkinje cells to mossy fiber inputs

    T J Ebner;J R Bloedel

  • Increased responsiveness of Purkinje cells associated with climbing fiber inputs to neighboring neurons.

    J. R. Bloedel;T. J. Ebner;Q. X. Yu

  • Functional characterization of neuronal circuitry of frog cerebellar cortex.

    R Llinas;J R Bloedel;D E Hillman

  • The changes in Purkinje cell simple spike activity following spontaneous climbing fiber inputs

    Christopher J. McDevitt;Timothy J. Ebner;James R. Bloedel

  • Multiple branching of cerebellar efferent projections in cats.

    D. L. Tolbert;H. Bantli;J. R. Bloedel

  • Responses of sagittally aligned Purkinje cells during perturbed locomotion: synchronous activation of climbing fiber inputs.

    Jau-Shin Lou;James R. Bloedel

  • Patients with cerebellar lesions cannot acquire but are able to retain conditioned eyeblink reflexes

    V Bracha;L Zhao;D A Wunderlich;S J Morrissy

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy J. Ebner
Timothy J. Ebner University of Minnesota
George E. Stelmach
George E. Stelmach Arizona State University
Rodolfo R. Llinás
Rodolfo R. Llinás New York University
Dagmar Timmann
Dagmar Timmann University of Duisburg-Essen
Jerrold L. Vitek
Jerrold L. Vitek University of Minnesota
Michal K. Stachowiak
Michal K. Stachowiak University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Andrew B. Schwartz
Andrew B. Schwartz University of Pittsburgh
Sid Gilman
Sid Gilman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James R. Bloedel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles