World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 114 4639 4351 2518 2332 569 64851

Ezekiel J. Emanuel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ezekiel J. Emanuel between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ezekiel J. Emanuel published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 13.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2008. 26 of the 621 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2008. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 32 publications 2005: 31 publications 2006: 26 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 38 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 35 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 13 publications
1980 2025

621 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ezekiel J. Emanuel: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 2
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 4
1988 5
1989 2
1990 3
1991 5
1992 5
1993 7
1994 8
1995 11
1996 9
1997 8
1998 11
1999 13
2000 12
2001 12
2002 18
2003 17
2004 32
2005 31
2006 26
2007 17
2008 38
2009 17
2010 13
2011 3
2012 20
2013 25
2014 11
2015 21
2016 24
2017 20
2018 22
2019 35
2020 28
2021 30
2022 17
2023 12
2024 13
2025 13
Total 621
Download as CSV

Ezekiel J. Emanuel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ezekiel J. Emanuel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 569 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 569
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ezekiel J. Emanuel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ezekiel J. Emanuel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 114–115 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393 114
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2004 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 1966 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Ezekiel J. Emanuel is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their work spans multiple aspects of healthcare policy, management, and economic evaluations within the health sciences.

The researcher has published extensively, including in venues such as JAMA, JAMA Network Open, JAMA Internal Medicine, The Lancet, and Health Affairs.

Frequent co-authors include Karen E. Joynt Maddox, Michael Berkwits, Robert Golub, Mary Mcdermott, and Jody Zylke.

Their recent papers include:

  • Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • An ethical framework for global vaccine allocation, 2020, Science
  • The Inevitable Reimagining of Medical Education, 2020, JAMA
  • Fairly Prioritizing Groups for Access to COVID-19 Vaccines, 2020, JAMA
  • COVID-19 and Excess All-Cause Mortality in the US and 18 Comparison Countries, 2020, JAMA

The main fields of study covered by their publications include Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases, Health, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their research focuses on the following topics:

  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies

Ezekiel J. Emanuel has been recognized with several awards, including Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2018, Member of the National Academy of Medicine since 2004, Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science since 1966, and membership in the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Four Models of the Physician-Patient Relationship

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;Linda L. Emanuel;Linda L. Emanuel

  • What Makes Clinical Research Ethical

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;David Wendler;Christine Grady

  • Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19.

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;Govind Persad;Ross Upshur;Beatriz Thome

  • Predicting the Future - Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine.

    Ziad Obermeyer;Ezekiel J. Emanuel

  • Symptoms and suffering at the end of life in children with cancer.

    Joanne Wolfe;Holcombe E. Grier;Neil Klar;Sarah B. Levin

  • What Makes Clinical Research in Developing Countries Ethical? The Benchmarks of Ethical Research

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;David Wendler;Jack Killen;Christine Grady

  • Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review.

    James Flory;Ezekiel Emanuel

  • Are racial and ethnic minorities less willing to participate in health research

    David Wendler;Raynard Kington;Jennifer Madans;Gretchen Van Wye

  • Advance Directives for Medical Care — A Case for Greater Use

    Linda L. Emanuel;Michael J. Barry;John D. Stoeckle;Lucy M. Ettelson

  • Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions.

    Govind Persad;Alan Wertheimer;Ezekiel J Emanuel

  • Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs.

    Emily Oshima Lee;Ezekiel J Emanuel

  • The promise of a good death

    Ezekiel J Emanuel;Linda L Emanuel

  • Attitudes and Practices of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in the United States, Canada, and Europe

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen;John W. Urwin;Joachim Cohen

  • Preserving the Physician-Patient Relationship in the Era of Managed Care

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;Nancy Neveloff Dubler

  • Understanding Economic and Other Burdens of Terminal Illness: The Experience of Patients and Their Caregivers

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;Diane L. Fairclough;Julia Slutsman;Linda L. Emanuel

  • The Economics of Dying -- The Illusion of Cost Savings at the End of Life

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;Linda L. Emanuel

  • Understanding of prognosis among parents of children who died of cancer: impact on treatment goals and integration of palliative care.

    Joanne Wolfe;Neil Klar;Holcombe E. Grier;Janet Duncan

  • Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: attitudes and experiences of oncology patients, oncologists, and the public

    E.J Emanuel;E.R Daniels;D.L Fairclough;B.R Clarridge

  • The Medical Directive. A new comprehensive advance care document

    Linda L. Emanuel;Ezekiel J. Emanuel

  • The MOOC Phenomenon: Who Takes Massive Open Online Courses and Why?

    Gayle Christensen;Andrew Steinmetz;Brandon Alcorn;Amy Bennett

Frequent Co-Authors

David Wendler
David Wendler National Institutes of Health
Christine Grady
Christine Grady National Institutes of Health
Kevin G. Volpp
Kevin G. Volpp University of Pennsylvania
Andrea B. Troxel
Andrea B. Troxel New York University
Diane L. Fairclough
Diane L. Fairclough University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Victor R. Fuchs
Victor R. Fuchs Stanford University
Arlene S. Ash
Arlene S. Ash University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Cary P. Gross
Cary P. Gross Yale University
Arnold M. Epstein
Arnold M. Epstein Harvard University
Daniel Polsky
Daniel Polsky Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

There are diverse online degree and certification paths for those interested in building a healthcare career, often making the journey more flexible and affordable. Students aspiring to advanced nursing roles may consider the cheapest DNP programs, which allow registered nurses to advance their qualifications without incurring excessive tuition costs.

For those seeking a pharmacy career, 3-year online PharmD programs offer accelerated pathways to becoming licensed pharmacists, with convenient remote study options. Health information management is also in high demand, and a range of online RHIT degree programs can open doors to administrative and compliance-focused positions in healthcare organizations.

Additionally, for those interested in the growing field of healthcare administration, medical coding certification cost is an important factor when choosing programs that help start a career in medical billing and coding. Each of these online options provides flexible entry or advancement opportunities in the medical field, meeting various goals and budgets.

Best Scientists Citing Ezekiel J. Emanuel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles