World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 98 9001 8449 4632 4285 285 30571

Diane L. Fairclough publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Diane L. Fairclough between 1980 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Diane L. Fairclough published across 45 years, from 1980 to 2024, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2010. 6 of the 311 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2010. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 1 publication
1980 2024

311 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Diane L. Fairclough: publications per year, 1980 to 2024
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 2
1987 4
1988 6
1989 4
1990 6
1991 8
1992 9
1993 8
1994 6
1995 11
1996 4
1997 7
1998 10
1999 9
2000 9
2001 5
2002 9
2003 5
2004 7
2005 5
2006 8
2007 6
2008 7
2009 7
2010 20
2011 8
2012 14
2013 16
2014 17
2015 5
2016 12
2017 6
2018 10
2019 4
2020 12
2021 9
2022 7
2023 5
2024 1
Total 311
Download as CSV

Diane L. Fairclough publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane L. Fairclough sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 285 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768 285
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Diane L. Fairclough D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane L. Fairclough sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668 98
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Diane L. Fairclough is affiliated with the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a notable emphasis on Clinical Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health. Additional areas of study include Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their work focuses on several main topics, including:

  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Family Support in Illness
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Some of the recent publications by Diane L. Fairclough include:

  • Comparison of Integrated Outpatient Palliative Care With Standard Care in Patients With Parkinson Disease and Related Disorders, 2020, JAMA Neurology
  • Safety and Benefit of Discontinuing Statin Therapy in the Setting of Advanced, Life-Limiting Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • In-person vs. web-based administration of a problem-solving skills intervention for parents of children with cancer: Report of a randomized noninferiority trial, 2020, EClinicalMedicine
  • Parent-Reported Symptoms and Medications Used Among Children With Severe Neurological Impairment, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Caregiver-guided pain coping skills training for patients with advanced cancer: Results from a randomized clinical trial, 2021, Palliative Medicine

Frequent co-authors in Fairclough's research include Robert B. Noll, Maru Barrera, Cynthia A. Gerhardt, Kathryn Vannatta, and Megan Voll, indicating collaborative efforts in their areas of expertise.

Their research is often published in journals such as Pediatric Blood & Cancer, JAMA Neurology, UNC Libraries, Journal of Pediatric Psychology, and Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, reflecting engagement with venues focused on both medical and psychological aspects of healthcare.

Best Publications

  • Comparison of Survival and Quality of Life in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Two Dose Levels of Paclitaxel Combined With Cisplatin Versus Etoposide With Cisplatin: Results of an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial

    Philip Bonomi;KyungMann Kim;Diane Fairclough;David Cella

  • Design and Analysis of Quality of Life Studies in Clinical Trials

    Diane Lynn Fairclough

  • Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United States.

    D.A. Revicki;D. Osoba;D. Fairclough;I. Barofsky

  • Understanding Economic and Other Burdens of Terminal Illness: The Experience of Patients and Their Caregivers

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;Diane L. Fairclough;Julia Slutsman;Linda L. Emanuel

  • A longitudinal study of respiratory viruses and bacteria in the etiology of acute otitis media with effusion.

    Frederick W. Henderson;Albert M. Collier;Margaret A. Sanyal;Jessie M. Watkins

  • Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: attitudes and experiences of oncology patients, oncologists, and the public

    E.J Emanuel;E.R Daniels;D.L Fairclough;B.R Clarridge

  • What is a clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) Questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Study 5592.

    David Cella;David T. Eton;Diane L. Fairclough;Philip Bonomi

  • Safety and benefit of discontinuing statin therapy in the setting of advanced, life-limiting illness a randomized clinical trial

    Jean S. Kutner;Patrick J. Blatchford;Donald H. Taylor;Christine S. Ritchie;Christine S. Ritchie

  • Attitudes and Desires Related to Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide Among Terminally Ill Patients and Their Caregivers

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;Diane L. Fairclough;Linda L. Emanuel

  • Assistance from family members, friends, paid care givers, and volunteers in the care of terminally ill patients.

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;Diane L. Fairclough;Julia Slutsman;Hillel Alpert

  • Differential dropout and bias in randomised controlled trials: when it matters and when it may not

    Melanie L Bell;Michael G Kenward;Diane L Fairclough;Nicholas J Horton

  • Clinicians’ Implicit Ethnic/Racial Bias and Perceptions of Care Among Black and Latino Patients

    Irene V. Blair;John F. Steiner;Diane L. Fairclough;Rebecca Hanratty

  • Age‐related differences in the quality of life of breast carcinoma patients after treatment

    Lari B. Wenzel;Diane L. Fairclough;Marianne J. Brady;David Cella

  • Symptoms, depression, and quality of life in patients with heart failure.

    David B. Bekelman;Edward P. Havranek;Diane M. Becker;Jean S. Kutner

  • Massage Therapy versus Simple Touch to Improve Pain and Mood in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Trial

    Jean S. Kutner;Marlaine C. Smith;Lisa Corbin;Linnea Hemphill

  • Attitudes and Practices Among Pediatric Oncologists Regarding End-of-Life Care: Results of the 1998 American Society of Clinical Oncology Survey

    Joanne M. Hilden;Ezekiel J. Emanuel;Diane L. Fairclough;Michael P. Link

  • Second malignancies after Ewing's sarcoma: radiation dose-dependency of secondary sarcomas.

    John F. Kuttesch;Leonard H. Wexler;Robert B. Marcus;Diane Fairclough

  • Results of treatment of advanced-stage Burkitt's lymphoma and B cell (SIg+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia with high-dose fractionated cyclophosphamide and coordinated high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine.

    S B Murphy;W P Bowman;M Abromowitch;J Mirro

  • Social competence and behavioral adjustment of children who are long-term survivors of cancer.

    Raymond K. Mulhern;Abby L. Wasserman;Alice G. Friedman;Diane Fairclough

  • Comparison of neuropsychologic functioning and clinical indicators of neurotoxicity in long-term survivors of childhood leukemia given cranial radiation or parenteral methotrexate: a prospective study.

    J Ochs;R Mulhern;D Fairclough;L Parvey

Frequent Co-Authors

Raymond K. Mulhern
Raymond K. Mulhern St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Robert B. Noll
Robert B. Noll University of Pittsburgh
David Cella
David Cella Northwestern University
John F. Steiner
John F. Steiner Kaiser Permanente
Sean Phipps
Sean Phipps St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Ernest R. Katz
Ernest R. Katz Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
Ezekiel J. Emanuel
Ezekiel J. Emanuel University of Pennsylvania
Maru Barrera
Maru Barrera University of Toronto
Larry A. Allen
Larry A. Allen University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Cynthia A. Gerhardt
Cynthia A. Gerhardt The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine doesn’t always require attending a traditional medical school. There are numerous related online degrees and career pathways designed to match a variety of interests and budgets. For those interested in the digital management of health data, an online health information management degree offers training in organizing and safeguarding patient information, a growing field due to the expansion of electronic health records.

If you prefer specialized skills in healthcare administration, a low cost medical coding and billing online program can help you quickly enter the workforce. These programs teach the foundational skills required to manage patient billing and insurance claims.

Nursing remains a high-demand field with online options for those wanting to advance their qualifications. The cheapest online nurse practitioner programs allow current nurses to move into advanced practice roles, while the cheapest online accelerated bsn programs provide an efficient route for those with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree to pivot into nursing careers quickly and affordably.

Best Scientists Citing Diane L. Fairclough

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles