World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 75 19098 17934 9521 8791 252 21731

Arlene S. Ash publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Arlene S. Ash between 1978 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Arlene S. Ash published across 49 years, from 1978 to 2026, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 1996. 9 of the 291 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 1996. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 21 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
1978 2026

291 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Arlene S. Ash: publications per year, 1978 to 2026
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 3
1990 3
1991 5
1992 4
1993 3
1994 3
1995 8
1996 21
1997 7
1998 12
1999 10
2000 10
2001 14
2002 7
2003 9
2004 14
2005 4
2006 3
2007 2
2008 8
2009 5
2010 8
2011 7
2012 7
2013 9
2014 12
2015 15
2016 7
2017 10
2018 2
2019 5
2020 9
2021 10
2022 8
2023 8
2024 7
2025 8
2026 1
Total 291
Download as CSV

Arlene S. Ash publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arlene S. Ash sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 252 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545 252
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Arlene S. Ash D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arlene S. Ash sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574 75
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Arlene S. Ash is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with notable contributions to subfields such as General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Emergency Medicine, Health, and Health Information Management.

The scientist's work encompasses a variety of topics, including Healthcare Policy and Management, Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations, Emergency and Acute Care Studies, Health disparities and outcomes, Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, Healthcare cost, quality, practices, and Primary Care and Health Outcomes.

Key recent publications by Arlene S. Ash include:

  • Association of Socioeconomic Disadvantage With Long-term Mortality After Myocardial Infarction, 2021, JAMA Cardiology
  • Measuring The Enduring Imprint Of Structural Racism On American Neighborhoods, 2023, Health Affairs
  • Secure Messaging, Diabetes Self-management, and the Importance of Patient Autonomy: a Mixed Methods Study, 2020, Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • Association of Trauma Center Designation With Postdischarge Survival Among Older Adults With Injuries, 2022, JAMA Network Open
  • Diagnostic Category Prevalence in 3 Classification Systems Across the Transition to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification, 2020, JAMA Network Open

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Arlene S. Ash include:

  • Matthew Alcusky
  • Jeroan J. Allison
  • Meagan J. Sabatino
  • Eric Mick
  • Mark S. Zocchi

The scholar has published extensively in journals such as:

  • JAMA Network Open
  • Health Services Research
  • Health Affairs
  • JAMA Health Forum
  • JMIR Diabetes

Throughout their career, Arlene S. Ash has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science since 2012 and as a Fellow of the American Statistical Association since 1998.

Best Publications

  • Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

    Jack Ende;Lewis Kazis;Arlene S. Ash;Mark A. Moskowitz

  • Inadequate Management of Blood Pressure in a Hypertensive Population

    Dan R. Berlowitz;Arlene S. Ash;Elaine C. Hickey;Robert H. Friedman

  • Risk adjustment of Medicare capitation payments using the CMS-HCC model

    Gregory C. Pope;John Kautter;Randall P. Ellis;Arlene S. Ash

  • METHODS FOR ANALYZING HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION AND COSTS

    P. Diehr;D. Yanez;Arlene S. Ash;M. Hornbrook

  • Relation of family responsibilities and gender to the productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty

    Phyllis L. Carr;Arlene S. Ash;Robert H. Friedman;Amy Scaramucci

  • Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: Is there equity?

    Arlene S. Ash;Phyllis L. Carr;Richard Goldstein;Robert H. Friedman

  • Junior faculty members' mentoring relationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools.

    Anita Palepu;Robert H. Friedman;Rosalind C. Barnett;Phyllis L. Carr

  • Faculty perceptions of gender discrimination and sexual harassment in academic medicine.

    Phyllis L. Carr;Arlene S. Ash;Robert H. Friedman;Laura Szalacha

  • Diagnosis-based risk adjustment for Medicare capitation payments.

    Randall P. Ellis;Gregory C. Pope;Lisa I. Iezzoni;John Z. Ayanian

  • Using Diagnoses to Describe Populations and Predict Costs

    Arlene S. Ash;Randall P. Ellis;Gregory C. Pope;John Z. Ayanian

  • Chemotherapy use among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life.

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;Yinong Young-Xu;Norman G. Levinsky;Gail Gazelle

  • Why are a quarter of faculty considering leaving academic medicine? A study of their perceptions of institutional culture and intentions to leave at 26 representative U.S. medical schools.

    Linda H. Pololi;Edward Krupat;Janet T. Civian;Arlene S. Ash

  • Searching for an improved clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data☆

    William A. Ghali;Ruth E. Hall;Amy K. Rosen;Arlene S. Ash

  • Adjusting Medicare capitation payments using prior hospitalization data

    Arlene S. Ash;Frank W. Porell;Leonard Gruenberg;Eric Sawitz

  • Influence of age on Medicare expenditures and medical care in the last year of life

    Norman G. Levinsky;Wei Yu;Arlene S. Ash;Mark A. Moskowitz

  • Place of death: U.S. trends since 1980.

    James Flory;Young-Xu Yinong;Ipek Gurol;Norman Levinsky

  • Racial and ethnic differences in end-of-life costs why do minorities cost more than whites?

    Amresh Hanchate;Andrea C. Kronman;Yinong Young-Xu;Arlene S. Ash

  • Black women receive less mammography even with similar use of primary care

    Risa B. Burns;Ellen P. McCarthy;Karen M. Freund;Sandra L. Marwill

  • Patient characteristics associated with oral anticoagulation control: results of the Veterans AffaiRs Study to Improve Anticoagulation (VARIA)

    Adam J. Rose;Elaine M. Hylek;Al Ozonoff;Al Ozonoff;Arlene S. Ash;Arlene S. Ash

  • Statewide Quality Improvement Initiatives and Mortality After Cardiac Surgery

    William A. Ghali;Arlene S. Ash;Ruth E. Hall;Mark A. Moskowitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Dan R. Berlowitz
Dan R. Berlowitz University of Massachusetts Lowell
Lisa I. Iezzoni
Lisa I. Iezzoni Harvard University
Randall P. Ellis
Randall P. Ellis Boston University
Amy K. Rosen
Amy K. Rosen VA Boston Healthcare System
Jeroan J. Allison
Jeroan J. Allison University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Elaine M. Hylek
Elaine M. Hylek Boston University
Donald R. Miller
Donald R. Miller University of Louisville
Catarina I. Kiefe
Catarina I. Kiefe University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Jennifer J. Anderson
Jennifer J. Anderson Boston University
Ezekiel J. Emanuel
Ezekiel J. Emanuel University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA opens several career pathways beyond traditional MD programs. Many students now consider online options to fit diverse lifestyles, budgets, and career goals. For those interested in advanced nursing, the best dnp programs online provide flexibility and specialized training for leadership roles in healthcare.

Pharmacists are crucial to patient care, and earning a pharmacy degree online can offer a convenient pathway into this fast-growing profession. Online pharmacy programs often blend virtual coursework with hands-on clinical rotations.

The healthcare industry also relies on talented managers and record keepers. Completing rhia certification programs online prepares graduates to organize and protect sensitive health information.

For those seeking entry-level opportunities, medical coding is in demand nationwide. Prospective coders often ask: how much does it cost to become a medical coder? Online courses offer affordable, flexible routes to certification, making this an accessible first step in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Arlene S. Ash

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles