World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 103 7149 6712 3754 3473 414 83400

Elaine M. Hylek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elaine M. Hylek between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elaine M. Hylek published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 12.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2014. 5 of the 414 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2014. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 38 publications 2014: 45 publications 2015: 40 publications 2016: 37 publications 2017: 35 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1992 2025

414 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elaine M. Hylek: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 3
2001 4
2002 2
2003 7
2004 7
2005 3
2006 9
2007 10
2008 19
2009 14
2010 11
2011 22
2012 25
2013 38
2014 45
2015 40
2016 37
2017 35
2018 22
2019 22
2020 12
2021 9
2022 3
2023 3
2024 4
2025 1
Total 414
Download as CSV

Elaine M. Hylek publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elaine M. Hylek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 414 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 414
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Elaine M. Hylek D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elaine M. Hylek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630 103
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Elaine M. Hylek is affiliated with Boston University in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the field of Medicine, with specific expertise in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their scholarly work spans across several subfields, including Epidemiology, Internal Medicine, Economics and Econometrics, and Genetics.

The main topics of their research activity include Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes, Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments, and Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias. The scientist also explores areas related to Acute Ischemic Stroke Management, Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management, Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies, and Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases.

Elaine M. Hylek has contributed frequently to several academic journals. The key publication venues for their work include:

  • Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
  • Heart Rhythm
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Heart
  • Stroke

The scientist's recent papers reflect a focus on cardiovascular conditions and treatments, specifically relating to anticoagulation and cardiac arrhythmias. Some of the notable recent publications are:

  • Milvexian for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (2021), New England Journal of Medicine
  • Trends in Atrial Fibrillation Incidence Rates Within an Integrated Health Care Delivery System, 2006 to 2018 (2020), JAMA Network Open
  • Decline in renal function and oral anticoagulation dose reduction among patients with atrial fibrillation (2020), Heart
  • Serial measurement of interleukin-6 and risk of mortality in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: Insights from ARISTOTLE and RE-LY trials (2020), Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • Discontinuation rates of warfarin versus direct acting oral anticoagulants in US clinical practice: Results from Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II (ORBIT-AF II) (2020), American Heart Journal

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Elaine M. Hylek's work, with frequent co-authors including Jonathan P. Piccini, Bernard J. Gersh, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Michael D. Ezekowitz, and Gregg C. Fonarow. These collaborators have contributed to multiple joint publications in the field of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Best Publications

  • Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

    Christopher B. Granger;John H. Alexander;Renato D. Lopes;Elaine M. Hylek

  • Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study.

    Alan S. Go;Elaine M. Hylek;Kathleen A. Phillips;YuChiao Chang

  • 2017 HRS / EHRA / ECAS / APHRS / SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

    Hugh Calkins;Gerhard Hindricks;Riccardo Cappato;Young Hoon Kim

  • Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).

    Jack Ansell;Jack Hirsh;Elaine Hylek;Alan Jacobson

  • The Pharmacology and Management of the Vitamin K Antagonists : The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

    Jack Ansell;Jack Hirsh;Leon Poller;Henry Bussey

  • Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal

    Charles V. Pollack;Paul A. Reilly;John Eikelboom;Stephan Glund

  • Oral Anticoagulant Therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Walter Ageno;Alexander S Gallus;Ann K Wittkowsky;Mark Crowther

  • Effect of intensity of oral anticoagulation on stroke severity and mortality in atrial fibrillation.

    Elaine M Hylek;Alan S Go;Yuchiao Chang;Nancy G Jensvold

  • Effect of intensity of oral anticoagulation on stroke severity and mortality in atrial fibrillation

    E.M Hylek;A.S Go;Y Chang

  • Grading Strength of Recommendations and Quality of Evidence in Clinical Guidelines: Report From an American College of Chest Physicians Task Force

    Gordon Guyatt;David Gutterman;Michael H. Baumann;Doreen Addrizzo-Harris

  • Major Hemorrhage and Tolerability of Warfarin in the First Year of Therapy Among Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

    Elaine M. Hylek;Carmella Evans-Molina;Carol Shea;Lori E. Henault

  • Risk Factors for Intracranial Hemorrhage in Outpatients Taking Warfarin

    Elaine M. Hylek;Daniel E. Singer

  • Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    John J. You;Daniel E. Singer;Patricia A. Howard;Deirdre A. Lane

  • Thrombosis A Major Contributor to Global Disease Burden

    G.E. Raskob;P. Angchaisuksiri;A.N. Blanco;H. Buller

  • Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal — Full Cohort Analysis

    Charles V. Pollack;Paul A. Reilly;Joanne van Ryn;John W. Eikelboom

  • An Analysis of the Lowest Effective Intensity of Prophylactic Anticoagulation for Patients With Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation

    Elaine M. Hylek;Steven J. Skates;Mary A. Sheehan;Daniel E. Singer

  • Anticoagulation therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: how well do randomized trials translate into clinical practice?

    Alan S. Go;Elaine M. Hylek;Yuchiao Chang;Kathleen A. Phillips

  • The “Gender Gap” in Authorship of Academic Medical Literature — A 35-Year Perspective

    Reshma Jagsi;Elizabeth A. Guancial;Cynthia Cooper Worobey;Lori E. Henault

  • Warfarin Use among Ambulatory Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: The AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study

    Alan S. Go;Elaine M. Hylek;Leila H. Borowsky;Kathleen A. Phillips

  • Advanced Age, Anticoagulation Intensity, and Risk for Intracranial Hemorrhage among Patients Taking Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation

    Margaret C Fang;Yuchiao Chang;Elaine M Hylek;Jonathan Rosand

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher B. Granger
Christopher B. Granger Duke University
Renato D. Lopes
Renato D. Lopes Duke University
Jonathan P. Piccini
Jonathan P. Piccini Duke University
Bernard J. Gersh
Bernard J. Gersh Mayo Clinic
Kenneth W. Mahaffey
Kenneth W. Mahaffey Stanford University
Lars Wallentin
Lars Wallentin Uppsala University
Gregg C. Fonarow
Gregg C. Fonarow University of California, Los Angeles
John H. Alexander
John H. Alexander Duke University
Eric D. Peterson
Eric D. Peterson The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Daniel E. Singer
Daniel E. Singer Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens up a range of academic and professional routes beyond the traditional MD. Many students are choosing flexible, affordable online programs that align with their career goals in the healthcare sector.

For those interested in healthcare leadership and management, an affordable mha online can be a smart option. This pathway prepares graduates for high-demand roles in hospital administration, policy, and healthcare consulting.

If your goal is to advance clinical practice, consider the cheapest dnp programs. These programs empower nurses to hold top-tier roles in patient care, leadership, and education.

Pharmacists are in steady demand, and the best online pharmacy school options can help you attain your degree with greater flexibility and lower cost.

Lastly, health information management is growing steadily. An him degree online equips graduates with the skills to manage medical data, compliance, and technology in healthcare settings.

Each of these online degrees can broaden your career prospects and make healthcare education more affordable and accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Elaine M. Hylek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles