World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
11108
World Ranking
10982
National Ranking
4567

Hava T. Siegelmann publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hava T. Siegelmann sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 188 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hava T. Siegelmann D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hava T. Siegelmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hava T. Siegelmann is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States. Their research spans several key areas in computer science and neuroscience, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to understanding neural dynamics and brain function through computational models.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the fields of computer science and neuroscience, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience, artificial intelligence, molecular biology, electrical and electronic engineering, and computer vision and pattern recognition. Their work integrates concepts from neural networks, advanced memory systems, and reinforcement learning to explore the mechanisms underlying brain function and learning processes.

Major topics in their research include:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Neural Networks and Applications
  • Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Siegelmann has published in diverse venues, with frequent contributions to arXiv (Cornell University), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Machine Intelligence, Neural Computation, and the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Brain-inspired replay for continual learning with artificial neural networks" (2020) published in Nature Communications
  • "Biological underpinnings for lifelong learning machines" (2022) published in Nature Machine Intelligence
  • "Replay in Deep Learning: Current Approaches and Missing Biological Elements" (2021) published in Neural Computation
  • "A modeling framework for adaptive lifelong learning with transfer and savings through gating in the prefrontal cortex" (2020) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "A collective AI via lifelong learning and sharing at the edge" (2024) published in Nature Machine Intelligence

Siegelmann frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Edward A. Rietman, Terrence J. Sejnowski, Devdhar Patel, Jack A. Tuszyński, and Arjun Karuvally. The frequency of their collaborations ranges from 5 to 12 joint publications, indicating ongoing partnerships within their research network.

Best Publications

  • Support vector clustering

    Asa Ben-Hur;David Horn;Hava T. Siegelmann;Vladimir Vapnik

  • On the Computational Power of Neural Nets

    H.T. Siegelmann;E.D. Sontag

  • Neural networks and analog computation: beyond the Turing limit

    Hava T. Siegelmann

  • Computational capabilities of recurrent NARX neural networks

    H.T. Siegelmann;B.G. Horne;C.L. Giles

  • Analog computation via neural networks

    Hava T. Siegelmann;Eduardo D. Sontag

  • Turing computability with neural nets

    Hava T. Siegelmann;Eduardo D. Sontag

  • Computation beyond the turing limit.

    Hava T. Siegelmann

  • Brain-inspired replay for continual learning with artificial neural networks.

    Gido M. van de Ven;Gido M. van de Ven;Hava T. Siegelmann;Andreas S. Tolias;Andreas S. Tolias

  • BindsNET: A Machine Learning-Oriented Spiking Neural Networks Library in Python.

    Hananel Hazan;Daniel J. Saunders;Hassaan Khan;Devdhar Patel

  • BindsNET: A machine learning-oriented spiking neural networks library in Python

    Hananel Hazan;Daniel J. Saunders;Hassaan Khan;Darpan T. Sanghavi

  • A support vector clustering method

    A. Ben-Hur;D. Horn;H.T. Siegelmann;V. Vapnik

  • The Dynamic Universality of Sigmoidal Neural Networks

    Joe Kilian;Hava T. Siegelmann

  • The global landscape of cognition: hierarchical aggregation as an organizational principle of human cortical networks and functions.

    P. Taylor;J. N. Hobbs;J. Burroni;H. T. Siegelmann

  • Symbolic dynamics and computation in model gene networks.

    R. Edwards;Hava Siegelmann;K. Aziza;L. Glass

  • A Support Vector Method for Clustering

    Asa Ben-Hur;David Horn;Hava T. Siegelmann;Vladimir Vapnik

  • Replay in Deep Learning: Current Approaches and Missing Biological Elements

    Tyler L. Hayes;Giri P. Krishnan;Maxim Bazhenov;Hava T. Siegelmann

  • Analog computation with dynamical systems

    Hava T. Siegelmann;Shmuel Fishman

  • Neural and Super-Turing Computing

    Hava T. Siegelmann

  • Computational power of neural networks: a characterization in terms of Kolmogorov complexity

    J.L. Balcazar;R. Gavalda;H.T. Siegelmann

  • Neural networks and analog computation

    Hava T. Siegelmann

  • Computational power of neural networks

    Hava T. Siegelmann;Eduardo Sontag

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Kozma
Robert Kozma University of Memphis
Eduardo D. Sontag
Eduardo D. Sontag Northeastern University
Asa Ben-Hur
Asa Ben-Hur Colorado State University
Terrence J. Sejnowski
Terrence J. Sejnowski Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Bhaskar DasGupta
Bhaskar DasGupta University of Illinois at Chicago
Hillel Pratt
Hillel Pratt Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Ophir Frieder
Ophir Frieder Georgetown University
Lilianne R. Mujica-Parodi
Lilianne R. Mujica-Parodi Stony Brook University
Kay M. Tye
Kay M. Tye Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Leon Glass
Leon Glass McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and complementary online degrees can open new doors for those interested in computer science or related fields. Many students look for the affordable master degree programs to enhance their expertise without overwhelming financial costs. These programs can offer flexibility for working professionals who want to upskill or transition into tech-driven roles.

Leadership skills are also a vital asset in the tech industry. Pursuing an online phd leadership can position graduates for executive, management, or academic positions where strategic thinking and innovation are key.

For those just starting their academic journey or seeking a quick entry point into technology and business careers, consider researching the best associates degrees to get. These programs offer a fast track to foundational knowledge with less time and budget commitment.

Additionally, those looking for chief roles in educational technology can benefit from the cheapest online doctorate in educational leadership, paving the way for leadership opportunities in academic and organizational settings.

Best Scientists Citing Hava T. Siegelmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles