World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
15023
World Ranking
8156
National Ranking
3496

Asa Ben-Hur publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Asa Ben-Hur sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 92 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Asa Ben-Hur D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Asa Ben-Hur sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Support vector clustering

    Asa Ben-Hur;David Horn;Hava T. Siegelmann;Vladimir Vapnik

  • A User's Guide to Support Vector Machines

    Asa Ben-Hur;Jason Weston

  • A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction

    Predrag Radivojac;Wyatt T Clark;Tal Ronnen Oron;Alexandra M Schnoes

  • Kernel methods for predicting protein--protein interactions

    Asa Ben-Hur;William Stafford Noble

  • A stability based method for discovering structure in clustered data.

    Asa Ben-Hur;Andre Elisseeff;Isabelle Guyon

  • Support vector machines and kernels for computational biology.

    Asa Ben-Hur;Cheng Soon Ong;Sören Sonnenburg;Bernhard Schölkopf

  • Result Analysis of the NIPS 2003 Feature Selection Challenge

    Isabelle Guyon;Steve Gunn;Asa Ben-Hur;Gideon Dror

  • Protein Interface Prediction using Graph Convolutional Networks

    Alex Fout;Jonathon Byrd;Basir Shariat;Asa Ben-Hur

  • A survey of the sorghum transcriptome using single-molecule long reads

    Salah E. Abdel-Ghany;Michael Hamilton;Jennifer L. Jacobi;Peter Ngam

  • An expanded evaluation of protein function prediction methods shows an improvement in accuracy

    Yuxiang Jiang;Tal Ronnen Oron;Wyatt T. Clark;Asma R. Bankapur

  • The CAFA challenge reports improved protein function prediction and new functional annotations for hundreds of genes through experimental screens

    Naihui Zhou;Yuxiang Jiang;Timothy R. Bergquist;Alexandra J. Lee

  • Large-scale identification of yeast integral membrane protein interactions

    John P. Miller;Russell S. Lo;Asa Ben-Hur;Cynthia Desmarais

  • Genotypic predictors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance

    Soo-Yon Rhee;Jonathan Taylor;Gauhar Wadhera;Asa Ben-Hur

  • RAMClust: a novel feature clustering method enables spectral-matching-based annotation for metabolomics data.

    C. D. Broeckling;F. A. Afsar;F. A. Afsar;S. Neumann;A. Ben-Hur

  • Detecting stable clusters using principal component analysis.

    Asa Ben-Hur;Isabelle Guyon

  • An expanded evaluation of protein function prediction methods shows an improvement in accuracy

    Yuxiang Jiang;Tal Ronnen Oron;Wyatt T Clark;Asma R Bankapur

  • Choosing negative examples for the prediction of protein-protein interactions

    Asa Ben-Hur;Asa Ben-Hur;William Stafford Noble

  • Remote homology detection: a motif based approach.

    Asa Ben-Hur;Douglas L. Brutlag

  • A support vector clustering method

    A. Ben-Hur;D. Horn;H.T. Siegelmann;V. Vapnik

  • SpliceGrapher: detecting patterns of alternative splicing from RNA-Seq data in the context of gene models and EST data

    Mark F Rogers;Julie Thomas;Anireddy Sn Reddy;Asa Ben-Hur

  • Additional file 1 of An expanded evaluation of protein function prediction methods shows an improvement in accuracy

    Yuxiang Jiang;Tal Ronnen Oron;Wyatt T. Clark;Asma R. Bankapur

Frequent Co-Authors

Hava T. Siegelmann
Hava T. Siegelmann University of Massachusetts Amherst
Anireddy S. N. Reddy
Anireddy S. N. Reddy Colorado State University
Karin Verspoor
Karin Verspoor RMIT University
Christophe Dessimoz
Christophe Dessimoz University College London
Tapio Salakoski
Tapio Salakoski University of Turku
David T. Jones
David T. Jones University College London
Daisuke Kihara
Daisuke Kihara Purdue University West Lafayette
Julian Gough
Julian Gough University of Bristol
Steven E. Brenner
Steven E. Brenner University of California, Berkeley
Burkhard Rost
Burkhard Rost Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields and online learning opportunities. Many students considering tech or science degrees are also curious about their career options and how to maximize their flexibility and return on investment.

If you’re asking, what can I do with an environmental science degree, you’ll discover roles in sustainability, data analytics, and research. Similarly, combining tech with environmental studies can lead to innovative jobs in green technology.

For those looking to study remotely, consider a computer science degree online to gain technical skills with faster completion times. Other technical paths include earning an environmental engineering degree online or even the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree, both of which prepare you for high-demand STEM careers.

By researching all your options in online education and related fields, you can tailor your academic journey to your personal interests and the evolving needs of the job market.

Best Scientists Citing Asa Ben-Hur

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles