World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
5995
World Ranking
10249
National Ranking
4302

Bhaskar DasGupta publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bhaskar DasGupta sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 223 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bhaskar DasGupta D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bhaskar DasGupta sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bhaskar DasGupta is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Chicago in the United States. Their research spans interdisciplinary areas combining medicine and computer science, focusing on computational and clinical challenges.

The main fields of study covered by DasGupta's work include Medicine and Computer Science. Their research delves into subfields such as Computational Theory and Mathematics, Rheumatology, Artificial Intelligence, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Genetics.

The scientist's research topics reflect a blend of medical and computational interests, including:

  • Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research

Recent publications demonstrate a breadth of collaborative and cross-disciplinary work. Notable papers include:

  • "Rituximab versus tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis: synovial biopsy-based biomarker analysis of the phase 4 R4RA randomized trial" (2022) published in Nature Medicine
  • "Rates and predictors of methotrexate-related adverse events in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: results from a nationwide UK study" (2022) published in Lara D. Veeken
  • "Detecting network anomalies using Forman-Ricci curvature and a case study for human brain networks" (2021) published in Scientific Reports
  • "Maximizing Coverage While Ensuring Fairness: A Tale of Conflicting Objectives" (2022) published in Algorithmica
  • "Is the relationship between deprivation and outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis mediated by body mass index? A longitudinal cohort study" (2022) published in Lara D. Veeken

DasGupta frequently publishes in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Lara D. Veeken, Algorithmica, Nature Medicine, and Scientific Reports. These outlets reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their work spanning theoretical and applied domains.

Collaborations are a significant aspect of DasGupta's research. Frequent co-authors include Tanima Chatterjee, Anastasios Sidiropoulos, Kimme L Hyrich, Réka Albert, and Nazanin Azarhooshang. The repeated partnerships illustrate active engagement in collaborative research efforts.

Best Publications

  • The Stewart platform manipulator: a review

    Bhaskar Dasgupta;T.S. Mruthyunjaya

  • Closed-Form Dynamic Equations of the General Stewart Platform through the Newton–Euler Approach

    Bhaskar Dasgupta;T.S. Mruthyunjaya

  • A general strategy based on the Newton-Euler approach for the dynamic formulation of parallel manipulators

    Bhaskar Dasgupta;Prasun Choudhury

  • Force redundancy in parallel manipulators: Theoretical and practical issues

    Bhaskar Dasgupta;T.S. Mruthyunjaya

  • Design and development of a Stewart platform based force– torque sensor

    T.A. Dwarakanath;Bhaskar Dasgupta;T.S. Mruthyunjaya

  • Parking slot assignment games

    Daniel Ayala;Ouri Wolfson;Bo Xu;Bhaskar Dasgupta

  • On distances between phylogenetic trees

    B. DasGupta;X. He;T. Jiang;M. Li

  • Algorithmic and complexity results for decompositions of biological networks into monotone subsystems.

    Bhaskar DasGupta;Germán Andres Enciso;Eduardo D. Sontag;Yi Zhang

  • On computing the nearest neighbor interchange distance

    B. DasGupta;X. He;T. Jiang;Ming Li

  • The Power of Approximating: a Comparison of Activation Functions

    Bhaskar DasGupta;Georg Schnitger

  • Reconstructing sibling relationships in wild populations

    Tanya Y. Berger-Wolf;Saad I. Sheikh;Bhaskar DasGupta;Mary V. Ashley

  • Topological implications of negative curvature for biological and social networks.

    Réka Albert;Bhaskar DasGupta;Nasim Mobasheri

  • Randomized approximation algorithms for set multicover problems with applications to reverse engineering of protein and gene networks

    Piotr Berman;Bhaskar DasGupta;Eduardo Sontag

  • Multi-phase algorithms for throughput maximization for real-time scheduling

    Piotr Berman;Bhaskar Dasgupta

  • Pricing of parking for congestion reduction

    Daniel Ayala;Ouri Wolfson;Bo Xu;Bhaskar DasGupta

  • Motif discoveries in unaligned molecular sequences using self-organizing neural networks

    Derong Liu;Xiaoxu Xiong;B. DasGupta;Huaguang Zhang

  • Improvements in throughout maximization for real-time scheduling

    Piotr Berman;Bhaskar DasGupta

  • On the complexity of training neural networks with continuous activation functions

    B. DasGupta;H.T. Siegelmann;E. Sontag

  • On the complexity and approximation of syntenic distance

    Bhaskar DasGupta;Tao Jiang;Sampath Kannan;Ming Li

  • A novel method for signal transduction network inference from indirect experimental evidence.

    Réka Albert;Bhaskar DasGupta;Riccardo Dondi;Sema Kachalo

  • NET-SYNTHESIS

    Sema Kachalo;Ranran Zhang;Eduardo Sontag;Réka Albert

Frequent Co-Authors

Piotr Berman
Piotr Berman Boston University
Eduardo D. Sontag
Eduardo D. Sontag Northeastern University
Tanya Y. Berger-Wolf
Tanya Y. Berger-Wolf The Ohio State University
Mary V. Ashley
Mary V. Ashley University of Illinois at Chicago
Haruki Nakamura
Haruki Nakamura Osaka University
Réka Albert
Réka Albert Pennsylvania State University
Marek Karpinski
Marek Karpinski University of Bonn
Wanpracha Art Chaovalitwongse
Wanpracha Art Chaovalitwongse University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Ming-Yang Kao
Ming-Yang Kao Northwestern University
Tao Jiang
Tao Jiang University of California, Riverside

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of computer science is closely connected to a variety of STEM career pathways. Today, flexible education options—including fully online degree programs—make it easier than ever to launch or advance your tech and engineering career from anywhere.

For those considering a digital-first route, choosing the right computer science degree online can help you build highly marketable skills fast. Similarly, if your interests mix technology with sustainability, you might explore what’s possible with an environmental science background. Discover what can i do with an environmental science degree and how it aligns with emerging green tech roles.

The engineering sector also offers strong online learning opportunities. You can pursue an environmental engineer degree online to play a pivotal part in sustainable innovation, or opt for a practical and versatile online degree in mechanical engineering to unlock opportunities in design, automation, and manufacturing.

No matter which path you choose, online degrees provide flexibility and access to a range of high-growth, high-impact careers in the United States and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Bhaskar DasGupta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles