World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
7084
World Ranking
6558
National Ranking
2221

Mary V. Ashley publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary V. Ashley sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mary V. Ashley D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary V. Ashley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary V. Ashley is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Chicago in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on Environmental Science, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their scholarly work addresses fundamental questions in genetics, ecology, and plant biology.

The scientist's research covers several subfields, including Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecological Modeling, and Cell Biology. These areas intersect with their main topics of study, which include Genetic diversity and population structure, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Plant and animal studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases, Botanical Studies and Applications, and Fish Ecology and Management Studies.

Mary V. Ashley has contributed to numerous peer-reviewed articles and other scholarly publications. Some notable papers include:

  • Answers Blowing in the Wind: A Quarter Century of Genetic Studies of Pollination in Oaks (2021), published in Forests
  • Dispersal ability correlates with range size in Amazonian habitat-restricted birds (2020), published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Quercus Conservation Genetics and Genomics: Past, Present, and Future (2021), published in Forests
  • Heterospecific pollination by an invasive congener threatens the native American bittersweet, Celastrus scandens (2021), published in PLoS ONE
  • Quercus Genetics: Insights into the Past, Present, and Future of Oaks (2021), published in Forests

Frequent coauthors include Janet Rizner Backs, David N. Zaya, João M. G. Capurucho, John M. Bates, and John T. Belcik. Collaborative efforts with these researchers have contributed to publications across multiple venues.

Mary V. Ashley's most frequent publication venues reflect their interdisciplinary focus and include:

  • Forests
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • PLoS ONE
  • International Journal of Plant Sciences
  • Journal of Biogeography

Their work centers on understanding complex ecological interactions and genetic mechanisms, with implications for conservation genetics, species distribution modeling, and evolutionary biology. The diverse range of topics and venues illustrates a comprehensive approach to environmental science and molecular biology research, addressing both theoretical and applied aspects in these fields.

Best Publications

  • Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa

    B. D. Dow;M. V. Ashley

  • Noninvasive paternity assignment in Gombe chimpanzees.

    Julie L. Constable;Mary V. Ashley;Jane Goodall;Anne E. Pusey

  • Evolutionarily enlightened management

    Mary V Ashley;Mary F Willson;Oliver R W Pergams;Dennis Jefferie O'Dowd

  • The paradox of forest fragmentation genetics.

    Andrea T. Kramer;Jennifer L. Ison;Mary V. Ashley;Henry F. Howe;Henry F. Howe

  • Characterization of highly variable (GA/CT) n microsatellites in the bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa

    B. D. Dow;M. V. Ashley;H. F. Howe

  • High levels of gene flow in bur oak revealed by paternity analysis using microsatellites

    BD Dow;MV Ashley

  • Plant Parentage, Pollination, and Dispersal: How DNA microsatellites have altered the landscape

    Mary V. Ashley

  • The breeding biology of lemon sharks at a tropical nursery lagoon.

    Kevin A. Feldheim;Samuel H. Gruber;Mary V. Ashley

  • The use of microsatellite analysis in population biology: background, methods and potential applications.

    M. V. Ashley;B. D. Dow

  • Global phylogeography and seascape genetics of the lemon sharks (genus Negaprion)

    J. K. Schultz;K. A. Feldheim;S. H. Gruber;M. V. Ashley

  • Population genetic structure of the lemon shark (Negaprion brevirostris) in the western Atlantic: DNA microsatellite variation.

    K. A. Feldheim;S. H. Gruber;M. V. Ashley

  • Two decades of genetic profiling yields first evidence of natal philopatry and long‐term fidelity to parturition sites in sharks

    Kevin Andrew Feldheim;Samuel H. Gruber;Joseph DiBattista;Elizabeth A. Babcock

  • RECONSTRUCTION OF PARENTAL MICROSATELLITE GENOTYPES REVEALS FEMALE POLYANDRY AND PHILOPATRY IN THE LEMON SHARK, NEGAPRION BREVIROSTRIS

    Kevin A. Feldheim;Samuel H. Gruber;Mary V. Ashley

  • Is pollen limited? The answer is blowin' in the wind

    Walter D. Koenig;Mary V. Ashley

  • High variability and disomic segregation of microsatellites in the octoploid Fragaria virginiana Mill. (Rosaceae).

    M. V. Ashley;J. A. Wilk;S. M. N. Styan;S. M. N. Styan;K. J. Craft

  • Low Genetic Differentiation across Three Major Ocean Populations of the Whale Shark, Rhincodon typus

    Jennifer V. Schmidt;Jennifer V. Schmidt;Claudia L. Schmidt;Fusun Ozer;Robin E. Ernst

  • mtDNA diversity in rhesus monkeys reveals overestimates of divergence time and paraphyly with neighboring species.

    Don J. Melnick;G. A. Hoelzer;R. Absher;M. V. Ashley

  • Limited hybridization between Quercus lobata and Quercus douglasii (Fagaceae) in a mixed stand in central coastal California.

    Kathleen J. Craft;Mary V. Ashley;Walter D. Koenig

  • ANALYSIS OF MITOCHONDRIAL DNA POLYMORPHISMS AMONG CHANNEL ISLAND DEER MICE.

    Mary Ashley;Christopher Wills

  • Microevolution in island rodents.

    Oliver R.W. Pergams;Mary V. Ashley

  • Reconstructing sibling relationships in wild populations

    Tanya Y. Berger-Wolf;Saad I. Sheikh;Bhaskar DasGupta;Mary V. Ashley

Frequent Co-Authors

Tanya Y. Berger-Wolf
Tanya Y. Berger-Wolf The Ohio State University
Bhaskar DasGupta
Bhaskar DasGupta University of Illinois at Chicago
Kevin A. Feldheim
Kevin A. Feldheim Field Museum of Natural History
Wanpracha Art Chaovalitwongse
Wanpracha Art Chaovalitwongse University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Samuel H. Gruber
Samuel H. Gruber University of Miami
Walter D. Koenig
Walter D. Koenig University of California, Berkeley
Ashfaq Khokhar
Ashfaq Khokhar Iowa State University
Joel S. Brown
Joel S. Brown University of Illinois at Chicago
Henry F. Howe
Henry F. Howe University of Illinois at Chicago
John M. Bates
John M. Bates Field Museum of Natural History

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse career options, many of which benefit from a strong interdisciplinary background. Those interested in quantitative analysis might consider a bachelor in mathematics online, as mathematics forms the foundation for data-driven ecological research and modeling.

Visual communication skills are also in demand. For students passionate about merging art and science, earning the best 2 year graphic design degree online can offer a practical route to careers in scientific visualization, infographics, and educational outreach.

Flexibility is important for today’s learners. Programs like the online interdisciplinary studies degree financial aid allow students to tailor their studies, integrating subjects like environmental science, policy, or public health according to their interests and career goals.

Finally, gaining a deeper understanding of the cultural and historical context of ecology could be achieved by pursuing a masters in history. This degree adds valuable perspective for roles in research, conservation policy, or science communication.

Best Scientists Citing Mary V. Ashley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles