World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
6286
World Ranking
8070
National Ranking
2892

Kevin A. Feldheim publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin A. Feldheim sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 167 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Kevin A. Feldheim D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin A. Feldheim sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kevin A. Feldheim is a researcher affiliated with the Field Museum of Natural History in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on subfields such as Nature and Landscape Conservation, Aquatic Science, Molecular Biology, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecology.

Their research covers key topics including Ichthyology and Marine Biology, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Fish Biology and Ecology Studies, Identification and Quantification in Food, Marine and Fisheries Research, Marine Ecology and Invasive Species, and Genetic Diversity and Population Structure.

Kevin A. Feldheim has contributed to several recent scientific papers, among which are:

  • Species composition of the largest shark fin retail-market in mainland China (2020), published in Scientific Reports
  • DNA Zip-coding: identifying the source populations supplying the international trade of a critically endangered coastal shark (2020), published in Animal Conservation
  • Relative contribution to the shark fin trade of Indo-Pacific and Eastern Pacific pelagic thresher sharks (2020), published in Animal Conservation
  • Artificial insemination and parthenogenesis in the whitespotted bamboo shark Chiloscyllium plagiosum (2021), published in Scientific Reports
  • Indo-Pacific origins of silky shark fins in major shark fin markets highlights supply chains and management bodies key for conservation (2020), published in Conservation Letters

Frequent collaborators in their research include Demian D. Chapman, Diego Cardeñosa, Stanley K. H. Shea, Elizabeth A. Babcock, and Andrew T. Fields.

Their work is often published in journals such as Ecology and Evolution, Journal of Fish Biology, Conservation Genetics, Scientific Reports, and Animal Conservation.

Best Publications

  • Larval Export from Marine Reserves and the Recruitment Benefit for Fish and Fisheries

    Hugo B. Harrison;Hugo B. Harrison;David H. Williamson;Richard D. Evans;Richard D. Evans;Glenn R. Almany

  • There and Back Again: A Review of Residency and Return Migrations in Sharks, with Implications for Population Structure and Management

    Demian D. Chapman;Kevin A. Feldheim;Yannis P. Papastamatiou;Robert E. Hueter

  • The breeding biology of lemon sharks at a tropical nursery lagoon.

    Kevin A. Feldheim;Samuel H. Gruber;Mary V. Ashley

  • Global phylogeography and seascape genetics of the lemon sharks (genus Negaprion)

    J. K. Schultz;K. A. Feldheim;S. H. Gruber;M. V. Ashley

  • Population genetic structure of the lemon shark (Negaprion brevirostris) in the western Atlantic: DNA microsatellite variation.

    K. A. Feldheim;S. H. Gruber;M. V. Ashley

  • Two decades of genetic profiling yields first evidence of natal philopatry and long‐term fidelity to parturition sites in sharks

    Kevin Andrew Feldheim;Samuel H. Gruber;Joseph DiBattista;Elizabeth A. Babcock

  • Permanent Genetic Resources added to Molecular Ecology Resources Database 1 October 2009–30 November 2009

    Junghwa An;Arnaud Bechet;Åsa Berggren;Sarah K. Brown

  • RECONSTRUCTION OF PARENTAL MICROSATELLITE GENOTYPES REVEALS FEMALE POLYANDRY AND PHILOPATRY IN THE LEMON SHARK, NEGAPRION BREVIROSTRIS

    Kevin A. Feldheim;Samuel H. Gruber;Mary V. Ashley

  • Long‐term natal site‐fidelity by immature lemon sharks (Negaprion brevirostris) at a subtropical island

    Demian D. Chapman;Elizabeth A. Babcock;Samuel H. Gruber;Joseph D. Dibattista

  • High variability and disomic segregation of microsatellites in the octoploid Fragaria virginiana Mill. (Rosaceae).

    M. V. Ashley;J. A. Wilk;S. M. N. Styan;S. M. N. Styan;K. J. Craft

  • Low Genetic Differentiation across Three Major Ocean Populations of the Whale Shark, Rhincodon typus

    Jennifer V. Schmidt;Jennifer V. Schmidt;Claudia L. Schmidt;Fusun Ozer;Robin E. Ernst

  • When bigger is not better: selection against large size, high condition and fast growth in juvenile lemon sharks

    J. D. Dibattista;K. A. Feldheim;S. H. Gruber;A. P. Hendry

  • Species composition of the international shark fin trade assessed through a retail-market survey in Hong Kong.

    Andrew T. Fields;Gunter A. Fischer;Stanley K. H. Shea;Huarong Zhang

  • A novel mini-DNA barcoding assay to identify processed fins from internationally protected shark species.

    Andrew T. Fields;Debra L. Abercrombie;Rowena Eng;Kevin Feldheim

  • Are indirect genetic benefits associated with polyandry? Testing predictions in a natural population of lemon sharks

    Joseph D. DiBATTISTA;Kevin A. Feldheim;Samuel H. Gruber;Andrew P. Hendry

  • A genetic assessment of polyandry and breeding-site fidelity in lemon sharks.

    Joseph D. DiBATTISTA;Kevin A. Feldheim;Xavier Thibert-Plante;Samuel H. Gruber

  • CITES-listed sharks remain among the top species in the contemporary fin trade

    Diego Cardeñosa;Andrew T. Fields;Elizabeth A. Babcock;Huarong Zhang

  • Is multiple mating beneficial or unavoidable? Low multiple paternity and genetic diversity in the shortspine spurdog Squalus mitsukurii

    Toby S. Daly-Engel;R. Dean Grubbs;Kevin A. Feldheim;Brian W. Bowen

  • Multiple Paternity of a Lemon Shark Litter (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhinidae)

    Kevin A. Feldheim;Samuel H. Gruber;Mary V. Ashley

  • Phylogeography of Two Closely Related Indo-Pacific Butterflyfishes Reveals Divergent Evolutionary Histories and Discordant Results from mtDNA and Microsatellites

    Joseph D. DiBattista;Luiz A. Rocha;Matthew T. Craig;Kevin A. Feldheim

  • Glacial survival and post-glacial recolonization of an arctic–alpine freshwater insect (Arcynopteryx dichroa, Plecoptera, Perlodidae) in Europe

    Kathrin Theissinger;Miklós Bálint;Kevin A. Feldheim;Peter Haase

  • Modelling range shifts and assessing genetic diversity distribution of the montane aquatic mayfly Ameletus inopinatus in Europe under climate change scenarios

    Julia Taubmann;Kathrin Theissinger;Kevin A. Feldheim;Irina Laube

  • Global population genetic dynamics of a highly migratory, apex predator shark

    Andrea M. Bernard;Kevin A. Feldheim;Michael R. Heithaus;Sabine P. Wintner

  • Shark Virgin Birth Produces Multiple, Viable Offspring

    Kevin A. Feldheim;Demian D. Chapman;Doug Sweet;Seán Fitzpatrick

  • Severe Inbreeding and Small Effective Number of Breeders in a Formerly Abundant Marine Fish

    Shannon J. O'Leary;Lyndie A. Hice;Kevin A. Feldheim;Michael G. Frisk

  • Genetic tagging to determine passive integrated transponder tag loss in lemon sharks

    K. A. Feldheim;S. H. Gruber;J. R. C. de Marignac;M. V. Ashley

Frequent Co-Authors

Demian D. Chapman
Demian D. Chapman Florida International University
Samuel H. Gruber
Samuel H. Gruber University of Miami
Mahmood S. Shivji
Mahmood S. Shivji Nova Southeastern University
Rauri C. K. Bowie
Rauri C. K. Bowie University of California, Berkeley
Joseph D. DiBattista
Joseph D. DiBattista Griffith University
Mary V. Ashley
Mary V. Ashley University of Illinois at Chicago
Elizabeth A. Babcock
Elizabeth A. Babcock University of Miami
Steffen U. Pauls
Steffen U. Pauls Senckenberg German Entomological Institute
Krystal A. Tolley
Krystal A. Tolley University of Johannesburg
Andrew P. Hendry
Andrew P. Hendry McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways, including research, policy-making, and sustainable development. For those considering advanced leadership roles in education or administration related to environmental fields, exploring online edd programs no dissertation can be a great option. These programs often provide flexibility for working professionals aiming to step into senior positions without the lengthy dissertation process.

Professionals seeking to advance their qualifications further might consider enrolling in accredited eds to edd programs. These pathways help educators and environmental specialists build expertise while balancing career and family obligations.

For those interested in social aspects of environmental work, such as community engagement and support, pursuing a dsw programs can enhance skills in social work leadership and policy implementation.

Additionally, students seeking an interdisciplinary approach may find value in online options like cheap online general studies degree programs. These offer broad-based knowledge useful for careers requiring a combination of scientific understanding and communication skills. Overall, the availability of specialized online degrees supports flexible education and varied career trajectories in environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin A. Feldheim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles