World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Francesco Di Raimondo

Francesco Di Raimondo

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 81 16511 15530 656 627 901 27437

Francesco Di Raimondo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Francesco Di Raimondo between 1950 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Francesco Di Raimondo published across 77 years, from 1950 to 2026, averaging 13.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 128 publications in 2023. 29 of the 1,053 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1950 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 128. Peak 128 publications in 2023. 1950: 7 publications 1951: 7 publications 1952: 7 publications 1953: 7 publications 1954: 2 publications 1955: 6 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 1 publication 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 2 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 1 publication 1964: 2 publications 1965: 2 publications 1966: 2 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 30 publications 2009: 59 publications 2010: 56 publications 2011: 51 publications 2012: 50 publications 2013: 47 publications 2014: 43 publications 2015: 49 publications 2016: 55 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 38 publications 2019: 62 publications 2020: 45 publications 2021: 48 publications 2022: 40 publications 2023: 128 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 27 publications 2026: 2 publications
1950 2026

1,053 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Francesco Di Raimondo: publications per year, 1950 to 2026
Year Publications
1950 7
1951 7
1952 7
1953 7
1954 2
1955 6
1956 0
1957 1
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 2
1962 0
1963 1
1964 2
1965 2
1966 2
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 1
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 1
1978 0
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 3
1983 0
1984 1
1985 4
1986 1
1987 4
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 2
1992 3
1993 1
1994 0
1995 2
1996 2
1997 3
1998 1
1999 0
2000 5
2001 15
2002 12
2003 9
2004 5
2005 9
2006 14
2007 19
2008 30
2009 59
2010 56
2011 51
2012 50
2013 47
2014 43
2015 49
2016 55
2017 27
2018 38
2019 62
2020 45
2021 48
2022 40
2023 128
2024 27
2025 27
2026 2
Total 1,053
Download as CSV

Francesco Di Raimondo publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco Di Raimondo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 901–920 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 901 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145 901
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Francesco Di Raimondo D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco Di Raimondo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 81
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Francesco Di Raimondo is affiliated with the University of Catania in Italy and has a substantial body of work in the field of medicine, particularly focusing on hematology and oncology. Their research spans several subfields including genetics, molecular biology, and pathology.

The scientist's recent papers demonstrate active engagement with current issues in hematological malignancies and treatment resistance. Notable publications include:

  • "Bosutinib for pretreated patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: primary results of the phase 4 BYOND study" (2020, Leukemia)
  • "Philadelphia-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia is associated with minimal residual disease persistence and poor outcome. First report of the minimal residual disease-oriented GIMEMA LAL1913" (2020, Haematologica)
  • "Mitochondrial Functions, Energy Metabolism and Protein Glycosylation are Interconnected Processes Mediating Resistance to Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma Cells" (2020, Biomolecules)
  • "A multicenter total therapy strategy for de novo adult Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients: final results of the GIMEMA LAL1509 protocol" (2021, Haematologica)
  • "CD49d promotes disease progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: new insights from CD49d bimodal expression" (2020, Blood)

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Alessandra Romano
  • Concetta Conticello
  • Giuseppe A. Palumbo
  • Andrea Duminuco
  • Massimo Gentile

Francesco Di Raimondo has published extensively in respected venues within the hematology and oncology communities. Common publication venues are:

  • Blood
  • HemaSphere
  • Haematologica
  • Frontiers in Oncology
  • Cancers

Their research focuses on the following main topics of interest:

  • Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment

Best Publications

  • BRAF mutations in hairy-cell leukemia

    Enrico Tiacci;Vladimir Trifonov;Gianluca Schiavoni;Antony Holmes

  • Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a randomised phase 3 study

    Michele Cavo;Paola Tacchetti;Francesca Patriarca;Maria Teresa Petrucci

  • Early Interim 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography Is Prognostically Superior to International Prognostic Score in Advanced-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Report From a Joint Italian-Danish Study

    Andrea Gallamini;Martin Hutchings;Luigi Rigacci;Lena Specht

  • Autologous transplantation and maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma

    Antonio Palumbo;Federica Cavallo;Francesco Di Raimondo

  • Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index 2: A New Prognostic Index for Follicular Lymphoma Developed by the International Follicular Lymphoma Prognostic Factor Project

    Massimo Federico;Monica Bellei;Luigi Marcheselli;Stefano Luminari

  • Brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy for CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphoma (ECHELON-2): a global, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial

    Steven Horwitz;Owen A O'Connor;Barbara Pro;Tim Illidge

  • Treatment of Older Patients with Mantle-Cell Lymphoma

    H. C. Kluin-Nelemans;Eva Hoster;Olivier Hermine;J. Walewski

  • Imatinib plus steroids induces complete remissions and prolonged survival in elderly Philadelphia chromosome-positive patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia without additional chemotherapy: results of the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) LAL0201-B protocol

    Marco Vignetti;Paola Fazi;Giuseppe Cimino;Giovanni Martinelli

  • Prospective, Randomized Study of Single Compared With Double Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Bologna 96 Clinical Study

    Michele Cavo;Patrizia Tosi;Elena Zamagni;Claudia Cellini

  • Treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): long-term follow-up of the GIMEMA ALL 0288 randomized study.

    Luciana Annino;Maria Luce Vegna;Andrea Camera;Giorgina Specchia

  • Front-line treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia with AIDA induction followed by risk-adapted consolidation for adults younger than 61 years: results of the AIDA-2000 trial of the GIMEMA Group

    Francesco Lo-Coco;Giuseppe Avvisati;Marco Vignetti;Massimo Breccia

  • Melphalan, Prednisone, and Lenalidomide Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Myeloma: A Report From the GIMEMA—Italian Multiple Myeloma Network

    Antonio Palumbo;Patrizia Falco;Paolo Corradini;Antonietta Falcone

  • Aspirin or enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide

    Alessandra Larocca;Federica Cavallo;Sara Bringhen;Francesco Di Raimondo

  • Prospective, multicenter randomized GITMO/IIL trial comparing intensive (R-HDS) versus conventional (CHOP-R) chemoimmunotherapy in high-risk follicular lymphoma at diagnosis: the superior disease control of R-HDS does not translate into an overall survival advantage

    Marco Ladetto;Federica De Marco;Fabio Benedetti;Umberto Vitolo

  • Health-related quality of life in chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving long-term therapy with imatinib compared with the general population

    Fabio Efficace;Michele Baccarani;Massimo Breccia;Giuliana Alimena

  • Whole-exome sequencing identifies somatic mutations of BCOR in acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype

    Vera Grossmann;Enrico Tiacci;Antony B. Holmes;Alexander Kohlmann

  • Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone-Thalidomide Followed by Maintenance With Bortezomib-Thalidomide Compared With Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Updated Follow-Up and Improved Survival

    Antonio Palumbo;Sara Bringhen;Alessandra Larocca;Davide Rossi

  • A comprehensive genetic classification of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): analysis of the GIMEMA 0496 protocol.

    Marco Mancini;Daniela Scappaticci;Giuseppe Cimino;Mauro Nanni

  • The EUTOS population-based registry: incidence and clinical characteristics of 2904 CML patients in 20 European Countries

    V. S. Hoffmann;M. Baccarani;J. Hasford;D. Lindoerfer

  • R-CVP Versus R-CHOP Versus R-FM for the Initial Treatment of Patients With Advanced-Stage Follicular Lymphoma: Results of the FOLL05 Trial Conducted by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi

    Massimo Federico;Stefano Luminari;Alessandra Dondi;Alessandra Tucci

Frequent Co-Authors

Pellegrino Musto
Pellegrino Musto University of Bari Aldo Moro
Maria Teresa Petrucci
Maria Teresa Petrucci Sapienza University of Rome
Mario Boccadoro
Mario Boccadoro University of Turin
Michele Cavo
Michele Cavo University of Bologna
Antonio Palumbo
Antonio Palumbo University of Turin
Gianluca Gaidano
Gianluca Gaidano University of Eastern Piedmont Amadeo Avogadro
Robin Foà
Robin Foà Sapienza University of Rome
Antonino Neri
Antonino Neri University of Milan
Giorgina Specchia
Giorgina Specchia University of Bari Aldo Moro
Davide Rossi
Davide Rossi European Society for Medical Oncology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always follow a single path. Today, there are flexible and fully online options for students eager to break into the healthcare field or advance their careers. For those interested in wellness and disease prevention, pursuing nutrition degrees online can open doors in clinical nutrition, public health, and food science.

If your goals include healthcare leadership, consider enrolling in one of the best online mha programs to develop management and policy skills tailored for hospitals and healthcare systems. Registered nurses seeking higher qualifications may benefit from earning their bachelor’s through an rn to bsn with no clinicals program, eliminating the need for additional on-site practicum.

Lastly, advanced practice nurses can accelerate their careers with the fastest msn to dnp program, moving into leadership, research, or advanced clinical practice roles. These related online programs broaden opportunities and offer new ways to impact patient care beyond the traditional path to a medical doctorate.

Best Scientists Citing Francesco Di Raimondo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles