World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
54
Citations
12017
World Ranking
2155
National Ranking
1040

Natalie Slopen publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie Slopen sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 165 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Natalie Slopen D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie Slopen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Natalie Slopen is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within social sciences, medicine, and health professions, with published works focusing on general health professions, clinical psychology, sociology and political science, health, and education.

Their recent publications include:

  • Associations of Depression, Anxiety, Worry, Perceived Stress, and Loneliness Prior to Infection With Risk of Post-COVID-19 Conditions, 2022, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Early Childhood Adversity, Toxic Stress, and the Impacts of Racism on the Foundations of Health, 2021, Annual Review of Public Health
  • Racial discrimination and telomere shortening among African Americans: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study, 2020, Health Psychology
  • Social Determinants of Cardiovascular Health: Early Life Adversity as a Contributor to Disparities in Cardiovascular Diseases, 2020, The Journal of Pediatrics
  • Pervasive Discrimination and Allostatic Load in African American and White Adults, 2020, Psychosomatic Medicine

The frequent co-authors of Natalie Slopen include:

  • David R. Williams
  • Sakurako S. Okuzono
  • Henning Tiemeier
  • Karestan C. Koenen
  • Jack P. Shonkoff

Their work is regularly published in the following venues:

  • JAMA Pediatrics
  • PEDIATRICS
  • JAMA Network Open
  • American Journal of Epidemiology
  • Development and Psychopathology

Key research topics covered by Slopen include:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Birth, Development, and Health

Best Publications

  • RACIAL DISPARITIES IN HEALTH: How Much Does Stress Really Matter?

    Michelle J. Sternthal;Natalie Slopen;David R. Williams

  • Associations of Depression, Anxiety, Worry, Perceived Stress, and Loneliness Prior to Infection With Risk of Post–COVID-19 Conditions

    Unknown

  • Childhood and Adolescent Adversity and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

    Shakira F. Suglia;Karestan C. Koenen;Renée Boynton-Jarrett;Paul S. Chan

  • How Adolescents Perceive the Stigma of Mental Illness and Alcohol Abuse

    Patrick W. Corrigan;Barbara Demming Lurie;Howard H. Goldman;Natalie Slopen

  • Newspaper stories as measures of structural stigma.

    Patrick W. Corrigan;Amy C. Watson;Gabriela Gracia;Natalie Slopen

  • Poverty, food insecurity, and the behavior for childhood internalizing and externalizing disorders.

    Natalie Slopen;Garrett Fitzmaurice;David R. Williams;Stephen E. Gilman

  • Childhood adversity and inflammatory processes in youth: A prospective study

    Natalie Slopen;Laura D. Kubzansky;Katie A. McLaughlin;Katie A. McLaughlin;Karestan C. Koenen

  • Racial Disparities in Child Adversity in the U.S. Interactions With Family Immigration History and Income

    Natalie Slopen;Jack P. Shonkoff;Michelle A. Albert;Hirokazu Yoshikawa

  • Discrimination and sleep: a systematic review.

    Natalie Slopen;Tené T. Lewis;David R. Williams

  • Developmental timing of child maltreatment and symptoms of depression and suicidal ideation in young adulthood: results from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health

    Erin C. Dunn;Erin C. Dunn;Katie A. McLaughlin;Katie A. McLaughlin;Natalie Slopen;Jonathan Rosand

  • Childhood gender nonconformity, bullying victimization, and depressive symptoms across adolescence and early adulthood: an 11-year longitudinal study

    Andrea L. Roberts;Margaret Rosario;Natalie Slopen;Jerel P. Calzo;Jerel P. Calzo

  • Perceived job insecurity as a risk factor for incident coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Marianna Virtanen;Solja T Nyberg;G David Batty;G David Batty;Markus Jokela

  • Early Childhood Adversity, Toxic Stress, and the Impacts of Racism on the Foundations of Health.

    Jack P Shonkoff;Natalie Slopen;David R Williams

  • Structural Stigma in State Legislation

    Patrick W. Corrigan;Amy C. Watson;Mark L. Heyrman;Amy Warpinski

  • Early Life Adversity and Inflammation in African Americans and Whites in the Midlife in the United States Survey

    Natalie Slopen;Tené T. Lewis;Tara L. Gruenewald;Mahasin S. Mujahid

  • Psychosocial stress and cigarette smoking persistence, cessation, and relapse over 9–10 years: a prospective study of middle-aged adults in the United States

    Natalie Slopen;Emily Zobel Kontos;Carol D. Ryff;John Z. Ayanian

  • Interventions to improve cortisol regulation in children: a systematic review.

    Natalie Slopen;Katie A. McLaughlin;Katie A. McLaughlin;Jack P. Shonkoff

  • Discrimination, other psychosocial stressors, and self-reported sleep duration and difficulties.

    Natalie Slopen;David R. Williams

  • Childhood adversity and immune and inflammatory biomarkers associated with cardiovascular risk in youth: a systematic review.

    Natalie Slopen;Karestan C. Koenen;Karestan C. Koenen;Laura D. Kubzansky

  • Job Strain, Job Insecurity, and Incident Cardiovascular Disease in the Women’s Health Study: Results from a 10-Year Prospective Study

    Natalie Slopen;Robert J. Glynn;Robert J. Glynn;Julie Elizabeth Buring;Julie Elizabeth Buring;Tené T. Lewis

  • Perceived job insecurity as a risk factor for incident coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Marianna Virtanen;Solja T. Nyberg;G. David Batty;Markus Jokela

Frequent Co-Authors

Julie E. Buring
Julie E. Buring Brigham and Women's Hospital
Katie A. McLaughlin
Katie A. McLaughlin University of Oregon
Karestan C. Koenen
Karestan C. Koenen Harvard University
Erin C. Dunn
Erin C. Dunn Harvard University
Alan M. Zaslavsky
Alan M. Zaslavsky Harvard University
Naomi Priest
Naomi Priest Australian National University
Susan Redline
Susan Redline Brigham and Women's Hospital
Laura D. Kubzansky
Laura D. Kubzansky Harvard University
Charles H. Zeanah
Charles H. Zeanah Tulane University
Charles A. Nelson
Charles A. Nelson Boston Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA offers an array of online options tailored to diverse career goals and lifestyles. For those seeking to upskill quickly, one year masters programs provide a fast route to an advanced degree, allowing graduates to enter or advance in the workforce sooner.

Undergraduates can benefit from accelerated bachelor's degree programs, which enable students to complete their studies in a shorter time frame, helping reduce costs and start careers more quickly.

Those interested in social work will find value in the cheapest online msw programs, which keep education affordable while preparing graduates for meaningful, in-demand careers focused on helping others.

In the field of behavioral analysis, bcba programs offer flexible, budget-friendly pathways to certification. This opens doors to work with individuals with behavioral needs or developmental disorders in a variety of settings.

Whether you’re aiming to save time, cut costs, or specialize, these online degrees and career tracks provide practical, accessible ways to advance in Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Natalie Slopen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles