World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 54 2155 1960 1040 934 165 12017

Natalie Slopen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Natalie Slopen between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Natalie Slopen published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 65 publications in 2024. 78 of the 252 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 65. Peak 65 publications in 2024. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 65 publications 2025: 13 publications
1987 2025

252 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Natalie Slopen: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 6
2006 0
2007 1
2008 0
2009 0
2010 4
2011 3
2012 6
2013 17
2014 7
2015 7
2016 8
2017 5
2018 18
2019 17
2020 14
2021 19
2022 16
2023 25
2024 65
2025 13
Total 252
Download as CSV

Natalie Slopen publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie Slopen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 165 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 165
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Natalie Slopen D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie Slopen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131 54
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Natalie Slopen is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within social sciences, medicine, and health professions, with published works focusing on general health professions, clinical psychology, sociology and political science, health, and education.

Their recent publications include:

  • Associations of Depression, Anxiety, Worry, Perceived Stress, and Loneliness Prior to Infection With Risk of Post-COVID-19 Conditions, 2022, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Early Childhood Adversity, Toxic Stress, and the Impacts of Racism on the Foundations of Health, 2021, Annual Review of Public Health
  • Racial discrimination and telomere shortening among African Americans: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study, 2020, Health Psychology
  • Social Determinants of Cardiovascular Health: Early Life Adversity as a Contributor to Disparities in Cardiovascular Diseases, 2020, The Journal of Pediatrics
  • Pervasive Discrimination and Allostatic Load in African American and White Adults, 2020, Psychosomatic Medicine

The frequent co-authors of Natalie Slopen include:

  • David R. Williams
  • Sakurako S. Okuzono
  • Henning Tiemeier
  • Karestan C. Koenen
  • Jack P. Shonkoff

Their work is regularly published in the following venues:

  • JAMA Pediatrics
  • PEDIATRICS
  • JAMA Network Open
  • American Journal of Epidemiology
  • Development and Psychopathology

Key research topics covered by Slopen include:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Birth, Development, and Health

Best Publications

  • RACIAL DISPARITIES IN HEALTH: How Much Does Stress Really Matter?

    Michelle J. Sternthal;Natalie Slopen;David R. Williams

  • Childhood and Adolescent Adversity and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

    Shakira F. Suglia;Karestan C. Koenen;Renée Boynton-Jarrett;Paul S. Chan

  • How Adolescents Perceive the Stigma of Mental Illness and Alcohol Abuse

    Patrick W. Corrigan;Barbara Demming Lurie;Howard H. Goldman;Natalie Slopen

  • Newspaper stories as measures of structural stigma.

    Patrick W. Corrigan;Amy C. Watson;Gabriela Gracia;Natalie Slopen

  • Poverty, food insecurity, and the behavior for childhood internalizing and externalizing disorders.

    Natalie Slopen;Garrett Fitzmaurice;David R. Williams;Stephen E. Gilman

  • Childhood adversity and inflammatory processes in youth: A prospective study

    Natalie Slopen;Laura D. Kubzansky;Katie A. McLaughlin;Katie A. McLaughlin;Karestan C. Koenen

  • Racial Disparities in Child Adversity in the U.S. Interactions With Family Immigration History and Income

    Natalie Slopen;Jack P. Shonkoff;Michelle A. Albert;Hirokazu Yoshikawa

  • Discrimination and sleep: a systematic review.

    Natalie Slopen;Tené T. Lewis;David R. Williams

  • Developmental timing of child maltreatment and symptoms of depression and suicidal ideation in young adulthood: results from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health

    Erin C. Dunn;Erin C. Dunn;Katie A. McLaughlin;Katie A. McLaughlin;Natalie Slopen;Jonathan Rosand

  • Childhood gender nonconformity, bullying victimization, and depressive symptoms across adolescence and early adulthood: an 11-year longitudinal study

    Andrea L. Roberts;Margaret Rosario;Natalie Slopen;Jerel P. Calzo;Jerel P. Calzo

  • Perceived job insecurity as a risk factor for incident coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Marianna Virtanen;Solja T Nyberg;G David Batty;G David Batty;Markus Jokela

  • Structural Stigma in State Legislation

    Patrick W. Corrigan;Amy C. Watson;Mark L. Heyrman;Amy Warpinski

  • Early Life Adversity and Inflammation in African Americans and Whites in the Midlife in the United States Survey

    Natalie Slopen;Tené T. Lewis;Tara L. Gruenewald;Mahasin S. Mujahid

  • Psychosocial stress and cigarette smoking persistence, cessation, and relapse over 9–10 years: a prospective study of middle-aged adults in the United States

    Natalie Slopen;Emily Zobel Kontos;Carol D. Ryff;John Z. Ayanian

  • Interventions to improve cortisol regulation in children: a systematic review.

    Natalie Slopen;Katie A. McLaughlin;Katie A. McLaughlin;Jack P. Shonkoff

  • Discrimination, other psychosocial stressors, and self-reported sleep duration and difficulties.

    Natalie Slopen;David R. Williams

  • Childhood adversity and immune and inflammatory biomarkers associated with cardiovascular risk in youth: a systematic review.

    Natalie Slopen;Karestan C. Koenen;Karestan C. Koenen;Laura D. Kubzansky

  • Job Strain, Job Insecurity, and Incident Cardiovascular Disease in the Women’s Health Study: Results from a 10-Year Prospective Study

    Natalie Slopen;Robert J. Glynn;Robert J. Glynn;Julie Elizabeth Buring;Julie Elizabeth Buring;Tené T. Lewis

  • Perceived job insecurity as a risk factor for incident coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Marianna Virtanen;Solja T. Nyberg;G. David Batty;Markus Jokela

Frequent Co-Authors

Julie E. Buring
Julie E. Buring Brigham and Women's Hospital
Katie A. McLaughlin
Katie A. McLaughlin University of Oregon
Karestan C. Koenen
Karestan C. Koenen Harvard University
Erin C. Dunn
Erin C. Dunn Harvard University
Alan M. Zaslavsky
Alan M. Zaslavsky Harvard University
Naomi Priest
Naomi Priest Australian National University
Susan Redline
Susan Redline Brigham and Women's Hospital
Laura D. Kubzansky
Laura D. Kubzansky Harvard University
Charles H. Zeanah
Charles H. Zeanah Tulane University
Charles A. Nelson
Charles A. Nelson Boston Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA offers an array of online options tailored to diverse career goals and lifestyles. For those seeking to upskill quickly, one year masters programs provide a fast route to an advanced degree, allowing graduates to enter or advance in the workforce sooner.

Undergraduates can benefit from accelerated bachelor's degree programs, which enable students to complete their studies in a shorter time frame, helping reduce costs and start careers more quickly.

Those interested in social work will find value in the cheapest online msw programs, which keep education affordable while preparing graduates for meaningful, in-demand careers focused on helping others.

In the field of behavioral analysis, bcba programs offer flexible, budget-friendly pathways to certification. This opens doors to work with individuals with behavioral needs or developmental disorders in a variety of settings.

Whether you’re aiming to save time, cut costs, or specialize, these online degrees and career tracks provide practical, accessible ways to advance in Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Natalie Slopen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles