World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 44 4043 3731 292 280 151 11662

Naomi Priest publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Naomi Priest between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Naomi Priest published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2012. 12 of the 168 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2012. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 4 publications
2001 2025

168 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Naomi Priest: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 1
2007 1
2008 7
2009 6
2010 6
2011 5
2012 20
2013 9
2014 12
2015 9
2016 6
2017 9
2018 10
2019 7
2020 14
2021 18
2022 8
2023 6
2024 8
2025 4
Total 168
Download as CSV

Naomi Priest publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Naomi Priest sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 144–153 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 151 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407 151
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Naomi Priest D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Naomi Priest sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269 44
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Naomi Priest is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with notable contributions in Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Health, General Health Professions, and Education.

The scientist's work centers on topics such as Racial and Ethnic Identity Research, Migration, Health and Trauma, Early Childhood Education and Development, Health disparities and outcomes, Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, and Stress Responses and Cortisol.

Naomi Priest has published research in several frequent venues, including the Australian Journal of Social Issues, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), International Journal of Epidemiology, Brain Behavior and Immunity, and Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health.

Their recent research papers include:

  • Adverse childhood experiences and trajectories of internalizing, externalizing, and prosocial behaviors from childhood to adolescence, 2021, Child Abuse & Neglect
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Everyday Discrimination Scale and biomarker outcomes, 2022, Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • Gender stereotypes and biases in early childhood: A systematic review, 2021, Australasian Journal of Early Childhood
  • Racial discrimination and socioemotional and sleep problems in a cross-sectional survey of Australian school students, 2020, Archives of Disease in Childhood
  • Prevalence of Everyday Discrimination and Relation with Wellbeing among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Adults in Australia, 2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

They have collaborated extensively with several frequent coauthors, including Shuaijun Guo, Meredith O'Connor, Mandy Truong, David R. Williams, and Yin Paradies.

Best Publications

  • Racism as a Determinant of Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Yin Paradies;Jehonathan Ben;Nida Denson;Amanuel Elias

  • Understanding associations among race, socioeconomic status, and health: Patterns and prospects.

    David R. Williams;Naomi Priest;Norman B. Anderson

  • A systematic review of studies examining the relationship between reported racism and health and wellbeing for children and young people

    Naomi Priest;Yin Paradies;Brigid Trenerry;Mandy Truong

  • Interventions to improve cultural competency in healthcare: a systematic review of reviews.

    Mandy Truong;Yin Paradies;Naomi Priest

  • Interventions implemented through sporting organisations for increasing participation in sport

    Nicki W Jackson;Faline S Howes;Sabrina Gupta;Jodie Doyle

  • Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke

    Ruchi Baxi;Mohit Sharma;Robert Roseby;Adam Polnay

  • Understanding the complexities of ethnic-racial socialization processes for both minority and majority groups: a 30-year systematic review

    Naomi Priest;Naomi Priest;Jessica Walton;Fiona White;Emma Kowal

  • A systematic review of the extent and measurement of healthcare provider racism.

    Yin Paradies;Mandy Truong;Naomi Priest

  • Bullying and mental health and suicidal behaviour among 14- to 15-year-olds in a representative sample of Australian children

    Rebecca Ford;Tania King;Naomi Priest;Anne Kavanagh

  • Racism as a determinant of social and emotional wellbeing for Aboriginal Australian youth

    Naomi C. Priest;Yin C. Paradies;Wendy Gunthorpe;Sheree J. Cairney

  • Socioeconomic risk factors for mental health problems in 4-5-year-old children: Australian population study.

    Elise Davis;Michael G. Sawyer;Sing Kai Lo;Naomi Priest

  • Adverse childhood experiences and trajectories of internalizing, externalizing, and prosocial behaviors from childhood to adolescence.

    Leonardo Bevilacqua;Yvonne Kelly;Anja Heilmann;Naomi Priest

  • Racism and health among urban Aboriginal young people

    Naomi Priest;Yin Paradies;Paul Stewart;Joanne Luke

  • Experiences of Racism, Racial/Ethnic Attitudes, Motivated Fairness and Mental Health Outcomes Among Primary and Secondary School Students

    Naomi Priest;Naomi Priest;Ryan Perry;Angeline S. Ferdinand;Yin Paradies

  • Policy interventions implemented through sporting organisations for promoting healthy behaviour change

    Naomi Priest;Rebecca Armstrong;Jodie Doyle;Elizabeth Waters

  • Identifying and developing effective approaches to foster intercultural understanding in schools

    Jessica Walton;Naomi Priest;Yin Paradies

  • Talking culture? Egalitarianism, color-blindness and racism in Australian elementary schools

    Jessica Walton;Jessica Walton;Naomi Priest;Emma Kowal;Fiona White

  • Aboriginal perspectives of child health and wellbeing in an urban setting: Developing a conceptual framework

    Naomi Priest;Tamara Mackean;Elise Davis;Lyn Briggs

  • Racism as a determinant of health: a protocol for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Yin Paradies;Naomi Priest;Jehonathan Ben;Mandy Truong

  • Understanding the Influence of Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Class on Inequalities in Academic and Non-Academic Outcomes among Eighth-Grade Students: Findings from an Intersectionality Approach

    Laia Bécares;Naomi Priest

  • Exploring relationships between racism, housing and child illness in remote indigenous communities

    Naomi Priest;Yin Paradies;Matthew Stevens;Ross Stewart Bailie

Frequent Co-Authors

Yin Paradies
Yin Paradies Deakin University
Elizabeth Waters
Elizabeth Waters University of Melbourne
Anne M Kavanagh
Anne M Kavanagh University of Melbourne
Margaret Kelaher
Margaret Kelaher University of Melbourne
Eric Emerson
Eric Emerson Lancaster University
Natalie Slopen
Natalie Slopen Harvard University
Lisa Gibbs
Lisa Gibbs University of Melbourne
Allison Milner
Allison Milner University of Melbourne
Fiona A. White
Fiona A. White University of Sydney
Tony Blakely
Tony Blakely University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open up a wide range of opportunities in social sciences and humanities. Many universities now offer flexible, accredited programs that cater to various interests, career goals, and backgrounds. For example, if you’re looking to make a direct impact in the field of social work, consider 1 year msw programs online no bsw—an ideal route for those seeking to fast-track their studies even without a Bachelor of Social Work degree.

Psychology is another popular pathway, and an accelerated bachelor's degree in psychology allows motivated students to earn their degree quickly and begin entering the workforce or pursuing graduate studies sooner. Those interested in clinical or school counseling should explore cacrep accredited programs, which ensure standardized training and better employment prospects.

For students aiming to work with couples or families, the cheapest online mft programs offer affordable, high-quality routes to becoming a licensed marriage and family therapist. Online degrees in these fields blend convenience, affordability, and career-driven outcomes, making them attractive pathways for future leaders in social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Naomi Priest

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles