World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
11397
World Ranking
7739
National Ranking
4152

Lori A. Roggman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lori A. Roggman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 358 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lori A. Roggman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lori A. Roggman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lori A. Roggman is affiliated with Utah State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a particular focus on Clinical Psychology, Education, and Social Psychology as subfields of study. Their work increasingly addresses Developmental and Educational Psychology and includes insights into Pharmacy.

Their main research topics include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, Family and Disability Support Research, Early Childhood Education and Development, Parental Involvement in Education, Child Abuse and Trauma, and Reading and Literacy Development.

Key recent publications by Lori A. Roggman include:

  • Life Satisfaction of Early Adolescents: Roles of Child Abuse, Friend Communication, and Self-Esteem (2023), published in the Journal of Child and Family Studies
  • A contribution to the Italian validation of the Parenting Interaction with Children: Checklist of Observations Linked to Outcome (PICCOLO) (2023), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • Maternal and paternal insensitivity, adaptive engagement, and school readiness skills among economically disadvantaged children: A dynamic approach (2021), published in Early Childhood Research Quarterly
  • Little Talks: Building Home Visiting's Capacity to Promote Communication and Language Skills for Children under Three Years of Age (2024), published in Children and Youth Services Review
  • Home visitor preparation in higher education (2024), published in Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education

Lori A. Roggman frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Mark S. Innocenti and Patricia H. Manz, each with two coauthored works, and SuJung Park, Diana J. Meter, and Rosario Montirosso with one coauthored publication each.

Their publications are often found in venues such as Utah State Research and Scholarship (Utah State University), Journal of Child and Family Studies, Frontiers in Psychology, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, and Children and Youth Services Review.

Best Publications

  • Attractive Faces Are Only Average

    Judith H. Langlois;Lori A. Roggman

  • Infant preferences for attractive faces: Rudiments of a stereotype?

    Judith H. Langlois;Lori A. Roggman;Rita J. Casey;Jean M. Ritter

  • The Ecology of Father‐Child Relationships: An Expanded Model

    Natasha J. Cabrera;Hiram E. Fitzgerald;Robert H. Bradley;Lori Roggman

  • Facial Diversity and Infant Preferences for Attractive Faces

    Judith H. Langlois;Jean M. Ritter;Lori A. Roggman;Lesley S. Vaughn

  • What Is Average and What Is Not Average About Attractive Faces

    Judith H. Langlois;Lori A. Roggman;Lisa Musselman

  • Adolescent perceived attachment to parents in relation to competence, depression, and anxiety: A longitudinal study.

    Dennis R. Papini;Lori A. Roggman

  • Stress, maternal depression, and negative mother–infant interactions in relation to infant attachment

    Diana D. Coyl;Lori A. Roggman;Lisa A. Newland

  • Sexual Selection, Physical Attractiveness, and Facial Neoteny: Cross-cultural Evidence and Implications [and Comments and Reply]

    Doug Jones;C. Loring Brace;William Jankowiak;Kevin N. Laland

  • Infants' differential social responses to attractive and unattractive faces

    Judith H. Langlois;Lori A. Roggman;Loretta A. Rieser-Danner

  • Parent Involvement in Early Childhood Home Visiting

    Jon Korfmacher;Beth L. Green;Fredi Staerkel;Carla Peterson

  • Modeling the Dynamics of Paternal Influences on Children over the Life Course.

    Natasha Cabrera;Hiram E. Fitzgerald;Robert H. Bradley;Lori Roggman

  • Early-Adolescent Perceptions of Attachment to Mother and Father A Test of the Emotional-Distancing and Buffering Hypotheses

    Dennis R. Papini;Lori A. Roggman;Jeannie Anderson

  • Low-Income Children's School Readiness: Parent Contributions Over the First Five Years

    Rachel Chazan-Cohen;Helen Raikes;Jeanne Brooks-Gunn;Catherine Ayoub

  • Playing with Daddy: Social Toy Play, Early Head Start, and Developmental Outcomes

    Lori A. Roggman;Lisa K. Boyce;Gina A. Cook;Katie Christiansen

  • Getting Dads Involved: Predictors of Father Involvement in Early Head Start and with their Children

    Lori A. Roggman;Lisa K. Boyce;Gina A. Cook;Jerry Cook

  • Parenting Interactions with Children: Checklist of Observations Linked to Outcomes (PICCOLO) in diverse ethnic groups.

    Lori A. Roggman;Gina A. Cook;Mark S. Innocenti;Vonda Jump Norman

  • What makes a face attractive and why: The role of averageness in defining facial beauty.

    Adam J. Rubenstein;Judith H. Langlois;Lori A. Roggman

  • IT TAKES TIME: IMPACTS OF EARLY HEAD START THAT LEAD TO REDUCTIONS IN MATERNAL DEPRESSION TWO YEARS LATER

    Rachel Chazan-Cohen;Catherine Ayoub;Barbara Alexander Pan;Lori Roggman

  • Who Drops Out of Early Head Start Home Visiting Programs

    Lori A. Roggman;Gina A. Cook;Carla A. Peterson;Helen H. Raikes

  • Infant Day‐Care, Attachment, and the “File Drawer Problem”

    Lori A. Roggman;Judith H. Langlois;Laura Hubbs-Tait;Loretta A. Rieser-Danner

  • Methodological, Measurement, and Design Issues in Studying Fathers: An Interdisciplinary Perspective

    Lori A. Roggman;Hiram E. Fitzgerald;Robert H. Bradley;Helen Raikes

Frequent Co-Authors

Judith H. Langlois
Judith H. Langlois The University of Texas at Austin
Helen Raikes
Helen Raikes University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Robert H. Bradley
Robert H. Bradley Arizona State University
Natasha J. Cabrera
Natasha J. Cabrera University of Maryland, College Park
Hiram E. Fitzgerald
Hiram E. Fitzgerald Michigan State University
Catherine Ayoub
Catherine Ayoub Boston Children's Hospital
Silvia Sörensen
Silvia Sörensen University of Rochester
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn Columbia University
Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda
Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda New York University
Jean Ann Summers
Jean Ann Summers University of Kansas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers, particularly in counseling and therapy. Many students choose to specialize in Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT), which requires a specific set of educational and licensure steps.

Prospective therapists must meet state-specific requirements, which often include earning a master’s or doctoral degree in marriage and family therapy or a closely related field. Some states, such as Texas, have distinct Dallas mft education requirements, while those aiming to practice in Colorado should be aware of the Denver mft education requirements.

If you’re considering working in Michigan, make sure to review the mft requirements in Detroit. Similarly, for those interested in North Carolina, learning how to become an mft in Durham is essential. Online psychology degrees can help you meet these prerequisites, offering flexibility to fit your schedule as you take crucial steps toward your chosen career path.

Best Scientists Citing Lori A. Roggman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles