World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Leslie A. Zebrowitz

Leslie A. Zebrowitz

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6615 6157 3591 3259 98 9974

Leslie A. Zebrowitz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Leslie A. Zebrowitz between 1980 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Leslie A. Zebrowitz published across 45 years, from 1980 to 2024, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2018. 1 of the 104 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2018. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1980 2024

104 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Leslie A. Zebrowitz: publications per year, 1980 to 2024
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 3
1992 3
1993 4
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 4
1999 1
2000 2
2001 4
2002 3
2003 5
2004 3
2005 1
2006 3
2007 3
2008 2
2009 3
2010 3
2011 5
2012 5
2013 4
2014 3
2015 3
2016 5
2017 5
2018 11
2019 4
2020 2
2021 3
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
Total 104
Download as CSV

Leslie A. Zebrowitz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leslie A. Zebrowitz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 98 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 98
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Leslie A. Zebrowitz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leslie A. Zebrowitz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Leslie A. Zebrowitz is affiliated with Brandeis University in the United States and conducts research primarily within the social sciences and neuroscience fields. Their work spans several subfields, including sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, organizational behavior and human resource management, as well as marketing.

The scholar's research topics frequently center around evolutionary psychology and human behavior, social and intergroup psychology, and the psychology of moral and emotional judgment. Other key areas of focus include employer branding and e-HRM, digital marketing and social media, the sharing economy and platforms, and face recognition and perception.

Leslie A. Zebrowitz has contributed to several academic journals and venues, including:

  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Journal of Personnel Psychology
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • Ecological Psychology

Recent publications by Leslie A. Zebrowitz and frequent collaborators include:

  • "Older and Younger Job Seekers' Impression Management on LinkedIn" (2021), published in Journal of Personnel Psychology
  • "Age differences in Neural Activation to Face Trustworthiness: Voxel Pattern and Activation Level Assessments" (2021), published in Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
  • "The role of perceived vulnerability to disease in political polarization on climate change" (2020), published in Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • "The Origins and Abiding Signature of the Ecological Theory of Social Perception in Social Psychology Research: A Tribute to Reuben Baron" (2024), published in Ecological Psychology
  • "Correction to: Age differences in Neural Activation to Face Trustworthiness: Voxel Pattern and Activation Level Assessments" (2021), published in Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience

Frequent collaborators include:

  • John Ksander
  • Angela Gutchess
  • Nouchine Hadjikhani
  • Noreen Ward
  • Jasmine Boshyan

Best Publications

  • Social Psychological Face Perception: Why Appearance Matters.

    Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Joann M. Montepare

  • Reading Faces: Window To The Soul?

    Leslie A. Zebrowitz

  • Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health

    Gillian Rhodes;Janelle Chan;Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Leigh W. Simmons

  • Looking Smart and Looking Good: Facial Cues to Intelligence and Their Origins

    L.A. Zebrowitz;J.A. Hall;N.A. Murphy;Gillian Rhodes

  • Accurate Social Perception at Zero Acquaintance: The Affordances of a Gibsonian Approach

    Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Mary Ann Collins

  • Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health

    Gillian Rhodes;Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Alison Clark;S. Michael Kalick

  • SENSITIVITY TO ''BAD GENES'' AND THE ANOMALOUS FACE OVERGENERALIZATION EFFECT: CUE VALIDITY, CUE UTILIZATION, AND ACCURACY IN JUDGING INTELLIGENCE AND HEALTH

    Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Gillian Rhodes

  • The impact of litigants' baby-facedness and attractiveness on adjudications in small claims courts

    Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Susan M. McDonald

  • Does Human Facial Attractiveness Honestly Advertise Health? Longitudinal Data on an Evolutionary Question

    S. Michael Kalick;Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Judith H. Langlois;Robert M. Johnson

  • "Wide-Eyed" and "Crooked-Faced": Determinants of Perceived and Real Honesty Across the Life Span

    Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Luminita Voinescu;Mary Ann Collins

  • Facial resemblance to emotions: group differences, impression effects, and race stereotypes.

    Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Masako Kikuchi;Jean Marc Fellous

  • Trait Impressions as Overgeneralized Responses to Adaptively Significant Facial Qualities: Evidence from Connectionist Modeling

    Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Jean Marc Fellous;Alain Mignault;Carrie Andreoletti

  • Person Perception Comes of Age: The Salience and Significance of Age in Social Judgments

    Joann M. Montepare;Leslie A. Zebrowitz

  • Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, Cognitive, and Social Perspectives

    Gillan Rhodes;Leslie A Zebrowitz

  • Impressions of Babyfaced Individuals Across the Life Span

    Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Joann M. Montepare

  • Mere Exposure and Racial Prejudice: Exposure to Other-Race Faces Increases Liking for Strangers of That Race

    Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Benjamin White;Kristin Wieneke

  • Stability of babyfaceness and attractiveness across the life span.

    Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Karen Olson;Karen Hoffman

  • They don't all look alike: individuated impressions of other racial groups.

    Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Joann M. Montepare;Hoon Koo Lee

  • First Impressions From Faces

    Leslie A Zebrowitz

  • Finally, faces find favor

    Leslie A. Zebrowitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Nouchine Hadjikhani
Nouchine Hadjikhani Harvard Medical School
Joann M. Montepare
Joann M. Montepare Lasell College
Gillian Rhodes
Gillian Rhodes University of Western Australia
Angela H. Gutchess
Angela H. Gutchess Brandeis University
Jean-Marc Fellous
Jean-Marc Fellous University of Arizona
Daniel Eisenberg
Daniel Eisenberg University of California, Los Angeles
Victoria Reyes-García
Victoria Reyes-García Autonomous University of Barcelona
Leigh W. Simmons
Leigh W. Simmons University of Western Australia
Judith A. Hall
Judith A. Hall Northeastern University
Reginald B. Adams
Reginald B. Adams Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in psychology opens the door to various career options, especially in health and education fields. One popular pathway is becoming a speech-language pathologist (SLP). This profession combines knowledge of psychology, communication, and specialized intervention skills.

Many aspiring SLPs pursue online psychology or communication sciences degrees before meeting state-specific requirements. Each state has its own licensure guidelines and educational steps. If you're considering this path, explore resources such as how to become a speech language pathologist in Kentucky, which covers degree prerequisites and supervised clinical experience in that state. In the South, the guide to how to become a speech language pathologist in Louisiana details certification exams and continuing education.

Northern states like Maine also have distinct steps, so it's important to review slp requirements in Maine. Likewise, Maryland residents can learn the specifics from the page on how to become a speech language pathologist in Maryland.

Whether you are interested in clinical work, research, or education, online psychology programs can be a flexible starting point for these meaningful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Leslie A. Zebrowitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles