World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
99
Citations
40885
World Ranking
8519
National Ranking
4393

G. Ralph Corey publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. Ralph Corey sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 273 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

G. Ralph Corey D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. Ralph Corey sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - The Walter E. Stamm Mentor Award, Infectious Diseases Society of America

Overview

G. Ralph Corey is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has an active research profile primarily focused on medicine with particular attention to cardiology, infectious diseases, and economic evaluations related to healthcare. Their work spans interdisciplinary subfields including cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, epidemiology, infectious diseases, clinical biochemistry, and economics and econometrics.

The research topics covered by G. Ralph Corey include cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies, health systems, economic evaluations and quality of life, infective endocarditis diagnosis and management, antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus, bacterial identification and susceptibility testing, healthcare costs and practices, and mechanical circulatory support devices.

They have authored research published in several notable venues, including:

  • Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology (2 publications)
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (1 publication)
  • JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology (1 publication)
  • EP Europace (1 publication)

The recent papers authored or co-authored by G. Ralph Corey include:

  • "Exebacase for patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection and endocarditis," 2020, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • "Impact of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection," 2020, Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
  • "Cost-Effectiveness of an Antibacterial Envelope for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection Prevention in the US Healthcare System From the WRAP-IT Trial," 2020, Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
  • "Clinical Presentation, Timing, and Microbiology of CIED Infections," 2020, JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology
  • "1261Geographical variations in the incidence of CIED infection and infection prevention strategies: Update from the global WRAP-IT study," 2020, EP Europace

Frequent collaborators include Bruce L. Wilkoff, Charles Kennergren, Khaldoun G. Tarakji, Suneet Mittal, and Daniel R. Lexcen.

In 2014, G. Ralph Corey received The Walter E. Stamm Mentor Award from the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Best Publications

  • Proposed Modifications to the Duke Criteria for the Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis

    Li Js;Sexton Dj;Mick N;Nettles R

  • Clinical Presentation, Etiology, and Outcome of Infective Endocarditis in the 21st Century: The International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study

    David R. Murdoch;G. Ralph Corey;Bruno Hoen;José M. Miró

  • Daptomycin versus Standard Therapy for Bacteremia and Endocarditis Caused by Staphylococcus aureus

    Vance G. Fowler;Helen W. Boucher;G. Ralph Corey;Elias Abrutyn

  • Staphylococcus aureus Endocarditis A Consequence of Medical Progress

    Vance G. Fowler;Jose M. Miro;Bruno Hoen;Christopher H. Cabell

  • Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

    Helen W. Boucher;G. Ralph Corey

  • Clinical identifiers of complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

    Vance G. Fowler;Maren K. Olsen;G. Ralph Corey;Christopher W. Woods

  • Contemporary Clinical Profile and Outcome of Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis

    Andrew Wang;Eugene Athan;Paul A. Pappas;Vance G. Fowler

  • Catheter-Related Bacteremia and Outcome of Attempted Catheter Salvage in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis

    K A Marr;D J Sexton;P J Conlon;G R Corey

  • Changing patient characteristics and the effect on mortality in endocarditis.

    Christopher H. Cabell;James G. Jollis;Gail E. Peterson;Gail E. Peterson;G. Ralph Corey

  • Outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia according to compliance with recommendations of infectious diseases specialists: experience with 244 patients.

    Vance G. Fowler;Linda L. Sanders;Daniel J. Sexton;Likuo Kong

  • Early Predictors of In-Hospital Death in Infective Endocarditis

    Vivian H. Chu;Christopher H. Cabell;Daniel K. Benjamin;Erin F. Kuniholm

  • An Integrated Clinico-Metabolomic Model Improves Prediction of Death in Sepsis

    Raymond J. Langley;Raymond J. Langley;Ephraim L. Tsalik;Ephraim L. Tsalik;Jennifer C. Van Velkinburgh;Seth W. Glickman;Seth W. Glickman

  • Role of echocardiography in evaluation of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: experience in 103 patients.

    Vance G Fowler;Jennifer Li;G.Ralph Corey;Jerry Boley

  • Clinical Predictors of Major Infections After Cardiac Surgery

    Vance G. Fowler;Sean M. O’Brien;Lawrence H. Muhlbaier;G. Ralph Corey

  • Persistent bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection is associated with agr dysfunction and low-level in vitro resistance to thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal protein.

    Vance G. Fowler;George Sakoulas;Lauren M. McIntyre;Lauren M. McIntyre;Venkata G. Meka

  • Increasing rates of cardiac device infections among Medicare beneficiaries: 1990-1999.

    Christopher H Cabell;Paul A Heidenreich;Vivian H Chu;Christopher M Moore

  • Use of Vancomycin or First-Generation Cephalosporins for the Treatment of Hemodialysis-Dependent Patients with Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

    Martin E. Stryjewski;Lynda A. Szczech;Daniel K. Benjamin;Jula K. Inrig

  • Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in Patients With Permanent Pacemakers or Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

    Anna Lisa Chamis;Gail E. Peterson;Christopher H. Cabell;G. Ralph Corey

  • Initial Low-Dose Gentamicin for Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis Is Nephrotoxic

    Sara E. Cosgrove;Gloria A. Vigliani;Marilyn Campion;Vance G. Fowler

  • Analysis of the impact of early surgery on in-hospital mortality of native valve endocarditis: use of propensity score and instrumental variable methods to adjust for treatment-selection bias.

    Tahaniyat Lalani;Christopher H. Cabell;Daniel K. Benjamin;Ovidiu Lasca

Frequent Co-Authors

Vance G. Fowler
Vance G. Fowler Duke University
Daniel J. Sexton
Daniel J. Sexton Duke University
José M. Miró
José M. Miró University of Barcelona
Christopher W. Woods
Christopher W. Woods Duke University
L. Barth Reller
L. Barth Reller Duke University
Ethan Rubinstein
Ethan Rubinstein University of Manitoba
Jennifer S. Li
Jennifer S. Li Duke University
Mark H. Wilcox
Mark H. Wilcox University of Leeds
Arnold S. Bayer
Arnold S. Bayer University of California, Los Angeles
Antoni Torres
Antoni Torres University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers beyond traditional medical school, several flexible online pathways can set you on the right track. Aspiring advanced practice nurses might consider the easiest DNP programs, designed for efficiency while maintaining high standards. These programs can help working professionals gain doctoral credentials in nursing leadership and practice without stepping away from their roles.

If you want to enter the workforce quickly, fast LPN program options offer direct, accelerated entry into practical nursing. Alternatively, for specialized roles in mental health, psych nurse practitioner programs prepare students to provide essential psychiatric care in various settings, all through convenient online study.

Interested in leadership or the business side of healthcare? The best online MHA programs focus on developing skills in healthcare management and administration, opening doors to executive and administrative careers in hospitals, clinics, and beyond. Each pathway provides unique advantages to help you tailor your education to your personal aspirations and schedules.

Best Scientists Citing G. Ralph Corey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles