World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
L. Barth Reller

L. Barth Reller

L. Barth Reller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by L. Barth Reller between 1970 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. L. Barth Reller published across 55 years, from 1970 to 2024, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2001. 1 of the 108 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2001. 1970: 2 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1970 2024

108 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
L. Barth Reller: publications per year, 1970 to 2024
Year Publications
1970 2
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 2
1979 1
1980 0
1981 2
1982 1
1983 2
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 2
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 2
1992 1
1993 4
1994 2
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 2
1999 4
2000 2
2001 16
2002 5
2003 11
2004 7
2005 9
2006 7
2007 15
2008 3
2009 0
2010 1
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 108
Download as CSV

L. Barth Reller publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where L. Barth Reller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

L. Barth Reller D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where L. Barth Reller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - Sonnenwirth Award for Leadership in Clinical Microbiology, American Society for Microbiology

Overview

L. Barth Reller is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their academic profile reflects involvement primarily in clinical microbiology, as indicated by an award received in 1997 from a prominent professional organization in this field.

In 1997, they were recognized with the Sonnenwirth Award for Leadership in Clinical Microbiology, awarded by the American Society for Microbiology. This award highlights contributions specifically related to leadership within the clinical microbiology discipline.

No publications, co-authors, or specific research topics beyond clinical microbiology and affiliated fields are documented for this scientist in the provided data. The absence of listed papers or journals suggests that detailed bibliographic information or extensive publication records are not available for public summary at this time.

Best Publications

  • Health care--associated bloodstream infections in adults: a reason to change the accepted definition of community-acquired infections.

    N. Deborah Friedman;Keith S. Kaye;Jason E. Stout;Sarah A. McGarry

  • Practice Guidelines for the Management of Infectious Diarrhea

    Richard L. Guerrant;Thomas Van Gilder;Ted S. Steiner;Nathan M. Thielman

  • Clinical identifiers of complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

    Vance G. Fowler;Maren K. Olsen;G. Ralph Corey;Christopher W. Woods

  • Detection of Bloodstream Infections in Adults: How Many Blood Cultures Are Needed?

    Andrew Lee;Stanley Mirrett;L. Barth Reller;Melvin P. Weinstein

  • Changing patient characteristics and the effect on mortality in endocarditis.

    Christopher H. Cabell;James G. Jollis;Gail E. Peterson;Gail E. Peterson;G. Ralph Corey

  • Persistent bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection is associated with agr dysfunction and low-level in vitro resistance to thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal protein.

    Vance G. Fowler;George Sakoulas;Lauren M. McIntyre;Lauren M. McIntyre;Venkata G. Meka

  • New consensus guidelines from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria

    James H. Jorgensen;Janet F. Hindler;L. Barth Reller;Melvin P. Weinstein

  • Use of Vancomycin or First-Generation Cephalosporins for the Treatment of Hemodialysis-Dependent Patients with Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

    Martin E. Stryjewski;Lynda A. Szczech;Daniel K. Benjamin;Jula K. Inrig

  • Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in Patients With Permanent Pacemakers or Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

    Anna Lisa Chamis;Gail E. Peterson;Christopher H. Cabell;G. Ralph Corey

  • Evaluation of a Rapid Immunochromatographic Test for Detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae Antigen in Urine Samples from Adults with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

    David R. Murdoch;Richard T. R. Laing;Graham D. Mills;Noel C. Karalus

  • Risk Factors For Hematogenous Complications of Intravascular Catheter—Associated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

    Vance G. Fowler;Anita Justice;Catrin Moore;Daniel K. Benjamin

  • Non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis.

    Susan Morpeth;David Murdoch;Christopher H. Cabell;Adolf W. Karchmer

  • Costs and outcomes among hemodialysis-dependent patients with methicillin-resistant or methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

    Shelby D. Reed;Joëlle Y. Friedman;John J. Engemann;Robert I. Griffiths

  • Multicenter studies of tigecycline disk diffusion susceptibility results for Acinetobacter spp

    Ronald N. Jones;Mary Jane Ferraro;L. Barth Reller;Paul C. Schreckenberger

  • The etiology of febrile illness in adults presenting to Patan hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal.

    David R. Murdoch;Christopher W. Woods;Mark D. Zimmerman;Peter M. Dull

  • Fatal Mycobacterium tuberculosis bloodstream infections in febrile hospitalized adults in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

    Lennox K. Archibald;Meyno O. den Dulk;Kisali J. Pallangyo;L. Barth Reller

  • Comparative Evaluation of Etest and Sensititre YeastOne Panels against the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27-A2 Reference Broth Microdilution Method for Testing Candida Susceptibility to Seven Antifungal Agents

    Barbara D. Alexander;Terry C. Byrne;Kelly L. Smith;Kimberly E. Hanson

  • The (1,3)β-d-Glucan Test as an Aid to Early Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections following Lung Transplantation

    Barbara D. Alexander;P. Brian Smith;R. Duane Davis;John R. Perfect

  • Risk of endocarditis among patients with prosthetic valves and Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

    Fadi El-Ahdab;Daniel Kelly Benjamin;Andrew Wang;Christopher H. Cabell

  • Cost savings with implementation of PNA FISH testing for identification of Candida albicans in blood cultures

    Barbara D. Alexander;Elizabeth Dodds Ashley;L. Barth Reller;Shelby D. Reed

Frequent Co-Authors

Melvin P. Weinstein
Melvin P. Weinstein Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Christopher W. Woods
Christopher W. Woods Duke University
Barbara D. Alexander
Barbara D. Alexander Duke University
Keith S. Kaye
Keith S. Kaye Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Arnold S. Bayer
Arnold S. Bayer University of California, Los Angeles
John J. LiPuma
John J. LiPuma University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael R. Yeaman
Michael R. Yeaman University of California, Los Angeles
Mary Jane Ferraro
Mary Jane Ferraro Harvard University
Charles W. Stratton
Charles W. Stratton Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Gary W. Procop
Gary W. Procop Cleveland Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in broadening their expertise beyond traditional microbiology, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Programs like cahiim accredited health information management programs online offer essential skills in managing patient data, a crucial part of healthcare operations that complement microbiology knowledge.

Many professionals also benefit from quick certification paths such as fast online medical billing and coding certification programs, which provide practical administrative expertise for working in clinical and medical settings. These certifications can enhance employability while requiring relatively short study periods.

If salary potential is a priority, exploring online healthcare degrees that pay well can guide students toward lucrative roles in public health, healthcare technology, or related disciplines. Combining microbiology with these qualifications can greatly improve career prospects.

For those aiming for leadership roles in health policy or epidemiology, researching which online mph programs are easiest to get into helps identify accessible public health master's programs. These degrees often complement microbiology graduates by expanding knowledge on disease prevention and population health.

Best Scientists Citing L. Barth Reller

Recently Published Articles