World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9739 9112 5146 4697 93 6987

Helen Raikes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Helen Raikes between 1981 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Helen Raikes published across 43 years, from 1981 to 2023, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2004. 1 of the 103 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2004. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1981 2023

103 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Helen Raikes: publications per year, 1981 to 2023
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 1
1999 3
2000 2
2001 0
2002 10
2003 2
2004 16
2005 7
2006 5
2007 5
2008 6
2009 7
2010 1
2011 1
2012 4
2013 11
2014 2
2015 1
2016 0
2017 1
2018 3
2019 7
2020 2
2021 2
2022 0
2023 1
Total 103
Download as CSV

Helen Raikes publications per year - data summary

  • Helen Raikes, a Psychology scholar from University of Nebraska–Lincoln, has 103 publications recorded across 43 years, from 1981 to 2023.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1981 and the most recent to 2023.
  • The most productive year is 2004, with 16 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1981, 1983, 1997, 1998 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 17 of the 43 years in the span carry no publications at all (1982, 1984, 1985, 1986 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.0 per year counting only the 26 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2019-2023) hold 12 publications, 12% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1981-1995: 2 publications (0.1 per year); 1996-2010: 66 publications (4.4 per year); 2011-2023: 35 publications (2.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Helen Raikes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen Raikes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 93 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 93
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Helen Raikes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Helen Raikes, a Psychology scholar from University of Nebraska–Lincoln, records 93 publications - the 15th percentile of the discipline.
  • 15% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Helen Raikes, and about 85% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Helen Raikes ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Helen Raikes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen Raikes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Helen Raikes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Helen Raikes, a Psychology scholar from University of Nebraska–Lincoln, records 35 D-Index - the 16th percentile of the discipline.
  • 16% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Helen Raikes, and about 84% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Helen Raikes ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Helen Raikes is affiliated with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas within the social sciences, with a specialization in education. Their work spans several interconnected subfields including education, clinical psychology, general health professions, and psychiatry and mental health.

The main topics addressed in their publications include early childhood education and development, parental involvement in education, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development. Additional topics are collaborative teaching and inclusion, food security and health in diverse populations, as well as child nutrition and feeding issues.

Frequent publication venues for Helen Raikes include:

  • Early Education and Development
  • Early Childhood Research Quarterly
  • Children

Helen Raikes has contributed to several papers, notably:

  • "Retention and turnover of teaching staff in a high-quality early childhood network" (2023), published in Early Childhood Research Quarterly
  • "Pathways to Low-Income Children's Self-Regulation: Child Temperament and the Qualities of Teacher-Child Relationships" (2020), published in Early Education and Development
  • "Relations Among Low-Income Preschool Children's Self-Regulation, Marginal Food Security, and Parent Stress" (2020), published in Early Education and Development
  • "Using the Very Short Form of the Children's Behavior Questionnaire for Spanish-Speaking Populations in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Psychometric Analysis of Dichotomized Variables" (2021), published in Children

Their research collaborations involve several frequent coauthors, including:

  • Amy Encinger
  • İbrahim H. Acar
  • Donna Bryant
  • Noreen Yazejian
  • Wonkyung Jang

Helen Raikes' scholarly contributions center on understanding early childhood educational environments and the influences on child development, especially in contexts affected by economic challenges. Their interdisciplinary approach integrates insights from psychology and health sciences to explore the roles of teacher-child relationships, parental involvement, and socio-economic factors such as food security.

Best Publications

  • The Effectiveness of Early Head Start for 3-Year-Old Children and Their Parents: Lessons for Policy and Programs

    John M. Love;Ellen E. Kisker;Christine Ross;Helen Raikes

  • Mother–Child Bookreading in Low‐Income Families: Correlates and Outcomes During the First Three Years of Life

    Helen Raikes;Barbara Alexander Pan;Gayle Luze;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

  • Child care quality matters: how conclusions may vary with context.

    John M. Love;Linda Harrison;Abraham Sagi‐Schwartz;Marinus H. Van IJzendoorn

  • The formative role of home literacy experiences across the first three years of life in children from low-income families

    Eileen T. Rodriguez;Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda;Mark E. Spellmann;Barbara A. Pan

  • Low-Income Children's School Readiness: Parent Contributions Over the First Five Years

    Rachel Chazan-Cohen;Helen Raikes;Jeanne Brooks-Gunn;Catherine Ayoub

  • Involvement in Early Head Start home visiting services: Demographic predictors and relations to child and parent outcomes

    Helen Raikes;Beth L. Green;Jane Atwater;Ellen Kisker

  • Predictors and outcomes of low-income fathers’ reading with their toddlers

    Elisabeth Duursma;Barbara Alexander Pan;Helen Raikes

  • Teacher education, motivation, compensation, workplace support, and links to quality of center-based child care and teachers’ intention to stay in the early childhood profession

    Julia C. Torquati;Helen Raikes;Catherine A. Huddleston-Casas

  • Low-Income Fathers' Involvement in Their Toddlers' Lives: Biological Fathers from the Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Study

    Natasha J. Cabrera;Rebecca M. Ryan;Jacqueline D. Shannon;Jeanne Brooks-Gunn

  • Cognitive skill performance among young children living in poverty: Risk, change, and the promotive effects of Early Head Start

    Catherine Ayoub;Erin O'Connor;Gabrielle Rappolt-Schlictmann;Claire Vallotton

  • Regulation, Subsidy Receipt and Provider Characteristics: What Predicts Quality in Child Care Homes?

    H. Abigail Raikes;Helen H. Raikes;Brian Wilcox

  • IT TAKES TIME: IMPACTS OF EARLY HEAD START THAT LEAD TO REDUCTIONS IN MATERNAL DEPRESSION TWO YEARS LATER

    Rachel Chazan-Cohen;Catherine Ayoub;Barbara Alexander Pan;Lori Roggman

  • Developmental Trends in Self‐regulation among Low‐income Toddlers

    H. Abigail Raikes;Jo Ann L. Robinson;Robert H. Bradley;Helen H. Raikes

  • Who Drops Out of Early Head Start Home Visiting Programs

    Lori A. Roggman;Gina A. Cook;Carla A. Peterson;Helen H. Raikes

  • Methodological, Measurement, and Design Issues in Studying Fathers: An Interdisciplinary Perspective

    Lori A. Roggman;Hiram E. Fitzgerald;Robert H. Bradley;Helen Raikes

  • Overview of Methodological,Measurement, and Design Issues in Studying Fathers: An Interdisciplinary Perspective

    Lori A. Roggman;H. E. Fitzgerald;R. H. Bradley;H. Raikes

  • What Makes a Difference: Early Head Start Evaluation Findings in a Developmental Context.

    John M. Love;Rachel Chazan-Cohen;Helen H Raikes;Jeanne Brooks-Gunn

  • Father Involvement in Early Head Start Programs

    Helen H. Raikes;Jean Ann Summers;Lori A. Roggman

  • Low-income fathers' and mothers' perceptions of the father role: A qualitative study in four early head start communities

    Jean Ann Summers;Helen Raikes;James Butler;Paul Spicer

  • The Early Head Start Father Studies: Design, Data Collection, and Summary of Father Presence in the Lives of Infants and Toddlers

    Kimberly Boller;Robert Bradley;Natasha Cabrera;Helen Raikes

  • Who Drops Out of Early Head Start Home Visit Programs

    Lori A. Roggman;G. A. Cook;C. Peterson;H. H. Raikes

Frequent Co-Authors

Lori A. Roggman
Lori A. Roggman Utah State University
Jean Ann Summers
Jean Ann Summers University of Kansas
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn Columbia University
Robert H. Bradley
Robert H. Bradley Arizona State University
Catherine Ayoub
Catherine Ayoub Boston Children's Hospital
Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda
Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda New York University
Natasha J. Cabrera
Natasha J. Cabrera University of Maryland, College Park
Hiram E. Fitzgerald
Hiram E. Fitzgerald Michigan State University
Hirokazu Yoshikawa
Hirokazu Yoshikawa New York University
Deborah A. Phillips
Deborah A. Phillips Georgetown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Many students consider advancing into specialized fields such as behavior analysis, which often requires postgraduate education and state-specific qualifications. For example, prospective professionals should review the Colorado Springs bcba education requirements to understand the coursework and certification needed in that region.

If you plan to practice in different cities, it’s important to research local criteria. Students interested in becoming Board Certified Behavior Analysts can learn about how to become a bcba in Columbus, or refer to the Corpus Christi bcba education requirements for specific guidelines in Texas.

Flexible online degree options make it easier than ever to gain the necessary expertise. Through these programs, graduates are equipped to pursue licensure and professional certification in their chosen states. For more information on local pathways, check advice for becoming a bcba in Dallas. Understanding these requirements helps future psychologists and behavior analysts plan successful careers in their areas of interest.

Best Scientists Citing Helen Raikes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles