World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
5773
World Ranking
9294
National Ranking
778

Bruno Kopp publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Kopp sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 109 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Bruno Kopp D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Kopp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruno Kopp is affiliated with Hannover Medical School in Germany and conducts research primarily in the fields of neuroscience and medicine. Their work extensively covers subfields including cognitive neuroscience, neurology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and pathology and forensic medicine.

The main topics of Bruno Kopp's research encompass neural and behavioral psychology studies, neurological disorders and treatments, botulinum toxin and related neurological disorders, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, neural dynamics and brain function, Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments, and cognitive functions and memory.

Bruno Kopp has contributed to several recent peer-reviewed publications. Notable papers feature the following titles:

  • "Electroencephalographic correlates of temporal Bayesian belief updating and surprise," 2021, NeuroImage
  • "Cognitive flexibility and N2/P3 event-related brain potentials," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "RELEX: An Excel-based software tool for sampling split-half reliability coefficients," 2020, Methods in Psychology
  • "Parallel model-based and model-free reinforcement learning for card sorting performance," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Split-Half Reliability Estimates for a Self-Administered Computerized Variant," 2021, Brain Sciences

The venues where Bruno Kopp frequently publishes include:

  • Brain Sciences
  • Journal of Neural Transmission
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Bruno Kopp's frequent coauthors include:

  • Alexander Steinke
  • Florian Lange
  • Dirk Dressler
  • Fereshte Adib Saberi
  • Antonino Visalli

This profile outlines Bruno Kopp's interdisciplinary research contributions, which range from basic cognitive neuroscience to clinical neurology and the development of psychological assessment tools.

Best Publications

  • N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control

    Bruno Kopp;Fred Rist;Uwe Mattler

  • Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients

    Annett Kunkel;Bruno Kopp;Gudrun Müller;Kersten Villringer

  • N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming

    Bruno Kopp;Uwe Mattler;Ralf Goertz;Fred Rist

  • Plasticity in the motor system related to therapy-induced improvement of movement after stroke.

    B Kopp;A Kunkel;W Mühlnickel;K Villringer

  • The arm motor ability test: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living

    Bruno Kopp;Annett Kunkel;Herta Flor;Thomas Platz

  • Mechanisms of Priming by Masked Stimuli: Inferences From Event-Related Brain Potentials

    Hartmut Leuthold;Bruno Kopp

  • Cognition in the early stage of multiple sclerosis.

    Doreen Schulz;Bruno Kopp;Annett Kunkel;Jürgen H. Faiss

  • An event-related brain potential substrate of disturbed response monitoring in paranoid schizophrenic patients.

    Bruno Kopp;Fred Rist

  • A computational analysis of the neural bases of Bayesian inference.

    Antonio Kolossa;Bruno Kopp;Tim Fingscheidt

  • Event-related potentials and cognition in Parkinson's disease: An integrative review

    Caroline Seer;Florian Lange;Dejan Georgiev;Marjan Jahanshahi

  • The Reliability of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in Clinical Practice

    Bruno Kopp;Florian Lange;Alexander Steinke

  • Age-related changes in neural recruitment for cognitive control.

    Bruno Kopp;Bruno Kopp;Florian Lange;Jürgen Howe;Karl Wessel

  • Fractionating the Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive Control

    Bruno Kopp;Sandra Tabeling;Carsten Moschner;Karl Wessel

  • Errors on the Trail Making Test Are Associated with Right Hemispheric Frontal Lobe Damage in Stroke Patients.

    Bruno Kopp;Nina Rösser;Sandra Tabeling;Hans Jörg Stürenburg

  • Performance on the Frontal Assessment Battery is sensitive to frontal lobe damage in stroke patients

    Bruno Kopp;Bruno Kopp;Nina Rösser;Sandra Tabeling;Hans Jörg Stürenburg

  • A model-based approach to trial-by-trial p300 amplitude fluctuations.

    Antonio Kolossa;Tim Fingscheidt;Karl Wessel;Bruno Kopp;Bruno Kopp

  • Electrophysiological indicators of surprise and entropy in dynamic task-switching environments

    Bruno Kopp;Florian Lange

  • Cognitive flexibility in neurological disorders: Cognitive components and event-related potentials.

    Florian Lange;Florian Lange;Caroline Seer;Bruno Kopp

  • Brain mechanisms of selective learning: event-related potentials provide evidence for error-driven learning in humans

    Bruno Kopp;Monika Wolff

  • Data quality over data quantity in computational cognitive neuroscience.

    Antonio Kolossa;Bruno Kopp

  • Movement-related potentials in Parkinson’s disease

    Dejan Georgiev;Dejan Georgiev;Florian Lange;Caroline Seer;Bruno Kopp

Frequent Co-Authors

Herta Flor
Herta Flor Heidelberg University
Hans-Otto Karnath
Hans-Otto Karnath University of Tübingen
Kirsten R. Müller-Vahl
Kirsten R. Müller-Vahl Hannover Medical School
Edward Taub
Edward Taub University of Alabama at Birmingham
Antonino Vallesi
Antonino Vallesi University of Padua
Marjan Jahanshahi
Marjan Jahanshahi University College London
Christiane Hermann
Christiane Hermann University of Giessen
Niels Birbaumer
Niels Birbaumer University of Tübingen
Nachshon Meiran
Nachshon Meiran Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Björn Lyxell
Björn Lyxell Linköping University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads students to consider a range of related online degrees and career pathways in behavioral and mental health fields. Many choose programs that allow them to specialize or broaden their expertise for applied or research-focused roles.

If you’re interested in supporting individuals and communities, an option like a social work accelerated program may be ideal. Those wanting to fast-track their knowledge in human behavior and cognition can consider a fast track psychology degree. Both paths prepare graduates for diverse roles in healthcare, education, or social services.

For those focused on therapeutic careers, online mental health counseling programs provide convenient, accredited pathways to licensure. If affordability is a priority, you might explore affordable online masters counseling programs to achieve your career goals without undue financial stress.

Each of these related programs can complement a neuroscience background and help expand your professional opportunities in the rapidly growing mental health and human services sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno Kopp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles