World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ruth M. Krebs

Ruth M. Krebs

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
5009
World Ranking
9884
National Ranking
142

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
5045
World Ranking
9023
National Ranking
108

Ruth M. Krebs publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth M. Krebs sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 84 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ruth M. Krebs D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth M. Krebs sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ruth M. Krebs is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with an emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience.

The main subjects of their work include:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Think green: Investing cognitive effort for a pro-environmental cause" (2022, Journal of Environmental Psychology)
  • "Comparing the motivational value of rewards and losses in an EEG-pupillometry study" (2020, European Journal of Neuroscience)
  • "Selective reinforcement of conflict processing in the Stroop task" (2021, PLoS ONE)
  • "Reinforcement learning of adaptive control strategies" (2024, Communications Psychology)
  • "Are all behavioral reward benefits created equally? An EEG-fMRI study" (2020, NeuroImage)

Krebs has frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • C. Nico Boehler
  • Nanne Kukkonen
  • Wim Notebaert
  • Joshua O. Eayrs
  • Arthur Prével

Their articles have appeared notably in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • NeuroImage
  • Acta Psychologica
  • European Journal of Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Mesolimbic Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Activations during Reward Anticipation Correlate with Reward-Related Ventral Striatal Dopamine Release

    Björn H Schott;Luciano Minuzzi;Ruth M Krebs;David Elmenhorst

  • The influence of reward associations on conflict processing in the Stroop task

    Ruth M. Krebs;Carsten N. Boehler;Marty G. Woldorff

  • Motivation and cognitive control in depression

    Ivan Grahek;Amitai Shenhav;Sebastian Musslick;Ruth M. Krebs

  • The Involvement of the Dopaminergic Midbrain and Cortico-Striatal-Thalamic Circuits in the Integration of Reward Prospect and Attentional Task Demands

    Ruth M. Krebs;Carsten N. Boehler;Carsten N. Boehler;Kenneth C. Roberts;Allen W. Song

  • Pinning down response inhibition in the brain - conjunction analyses of the Stop-signal task

    Carsten Nicolas Boehler;Lawrence G. Appelbaum;Ruth M. Krebs;Jens-Max Hopf;Jens-Max Hopf

  • The neural underpinnings of how reward associations can both guide and misguide attention.

    Ruth M. Krebs;Carsten N. Boehler;Tobias Egner;Marty G. Woldorff

  • Novelty increases the mesolimbic functional connectivity of the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA) during reward anticipation: Evidence from high-resolution fMRI

    Ruth Krebs;Dorothee Heipertz;Hartmut Schuetze;Emrah Duzel;Emrah Duzel

  • The Novelty Exploration Bonus and Its Attentional Modulation.

    Ruth M. Krebs;Björn H. Schott;Björn H. Schott;Björn H. Schott;Hartmut Schütze;Emrah Düzel;Emrah Düzel

  • Personality Traits Are Differentially Associated with Patterns of Reward and Novelty Processing in the Human Substantia Nigra/Ventral Tegmental Area

    Ruth M. Krebs;Björn H. Schott;Björn H. Schott;Björn H. Schott;Emrah Düzel;Emrah Düzel

  • Task preparation processes related to reward prediction precede those related to task-difficulty expectation

    Hanne Schevernels;Ruth M. Krebs;Patrick Santens;Marty G. Woldorff

  • Utilization of reward-prospect enhances preparatory attention and reduces stimulus conflict

    Berry van den Berg;Berry van den Berg;Ruth M. Krebs;Monicque M. Lorist;Marty G. Woldorff

  • Reward prospect rapidly speeds up response inhibition via reactive control

    Carsten N. Boehler;Hanne Schevernels;Jens-Max Hopf;Jens-Max Hopf;Christian M. Stoppel;Christian M. Stoppel

  • Task-Load-Dependent Activation of Dopaminergic Midbrain Areas in the Absence of Reward

    Carsten N Boehler;Jens-Max Hopf;Ruth M Krebs;Christian M Stoppel

  • Sensory MEG Responses Predict Successful and Failed Inhibition in a Stop-Signal Task

    C. N. Boehler;T. F. Münte;R. M. Krebs;H. J. Heinze;H. J. Heinze

  • Neural conflict-control mechanisms improve memory for target stimuli.

    Ruth M. Krebs;Carsten N. Boehler;Maya De Belder;Tobias Egner

  • Motivating inhibition: reward prospect speeds up response cancellation

    Carsten N. Boehler;Jens-Max Hopf;Christian M. Stoppel;Ruth M. Krebs

  • Anticipatory processes in brain state switching - evidence from a novel cued-switching task implicating default mode and salience networks.

    Justina Sidlauskaite;Jan R. Wiersema;Herbert Roeyers;Ruth M. Krebs

  • The role of anterior cingulate cortex in the affective evaluation of conflict

    Senne Braem;Joseph A. King;Franziska M. Korb;Ruth M. Krebs

  • Cognitive Control in Depression: Toward Clinical Models Informed by Cognitive Neuroscience:

    Ivan Grahek;Jonas Everaert;Jonas Everaert;Ruth M. Krebs;Ernst H. W. Koster

  • Affective Modulation of Cognitive Control is Determined by Performance-Contingency and Mediated by Ventromedial Prefrontal and Cingulate Cortex

    Senne Braem;Joseph A. King;Franziska M. Korb;Ruth M. Krebs

  • Reward associations reduce behavioral interference by changing the temporal dynamics of conflict processing.

    Ruth M. Krebs;Ruth M. Krebs;Carsten N. Boehler;Carsten N. Boehler;Lawrence G. Appelbaum;Marty G. Woldorff

  • Dissociating contributions of ACC and vmPFC in reward prediction, outcome, and choice

    Eliana Vassena;Eliana Vassena;Ruth M. Krebs;Massimo Silvetti;Massimo Silvetti;Wim Fias;Wim Fias

Frequent Co-Authors

Carsten N. Boehler
Carsten N. Boehler Ghent University
Jens-Max Hopf
Jens-Max Hopf Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Marty G. Woldorff
Marty G. Woldorff Duke University
Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld
Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Hans-Jochen Heinze
Hans-Jochen Heinze Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Emrah Düzel
Emrah Düzel German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Björn H. Schott
Björn H. Schott University of Göttingen
Tom Verguts
Tom Verguts Ghent University
Wim Fias
Wim Fias Ghent University
Tobias Egner
Tobias Egner Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Neuroscience, exploring related online degrees and career pathways can expand your opportunities in both research and applied settings. Fields such as psychology, social work, and behavioral analysis are closely linked, offering valuable skills and insights relevant to neuroscience careers.

Many universities now offer flexible and accessible options for further study. If you're considering roles in clinical or community support, the most affordable msw programs online can help you enter or advance in social work without breaking the bank. Some students may want to fast-track their path, and for them, a social work accelerated program could be the right choice.

Those with a focus on psychology or behavioral science might explore an online accelerated psychology degree to quickly gain the credentials needed for diverse roles. Additionally, those interested in applied behavioral analysis may consider a bcba school online to qualify for Board Certified Behavior Analyst roles.

Choosing the right online degree track depends on your career goals, timeline, and budget. Each of these pathways can complement neuroscience, opening up a range of rewarding professional possibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Ruth M. Krebs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles