World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
12394
World Ranking
3564
National Ranking
46

Neuroscience

D-Index
60
Citations
12415
World Ranking
3855
National Ranking
43

Tom Verguts publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Verguts sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 226 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Tom Verguts D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Verguts sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tom Verguts is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium, where their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and cognitive neuroscience. Their work spans multiple interconnected areas including neural and behavioral psychology studies, neural dynamics and brain function, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, memory and neural mechanisms, functional brain connectivity studies, decision-making and behavioral economics, and obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders.

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on cognitive control, brain connectivity, and decision-making processes. Key papers include the 2022 article, Theta oscillations shift towards optimal frequency for cognitive control, published in Nature Human Behaviour; the 2021 work, The Best Laid Plans: Computational Principles of Anterior Cingulate Cortex, in Trends in Cognitive Sciences; and the 2020 paper, Cognitive Effort Modulates Connectivity between Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Task-Relevant Cortical Areas, published in the Journal of Neuroscience. Other notable publications are Reward Prediction Error and Declarative Memory (2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences) and Dynamic expressions of confidence within an evidence accumulation framework (2020, Cognition).

Frequent co-authors on Verguts' work include Pieter Verbeke, Kobe Desender, Esther De Loof, Cristian Buc Calderon, and Kate Ergo, reflecting collaborations that have contributed to a breadth of research outputs.

The venues where Verguts most commonly publishes include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PLoS Computational Biology
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Verguts has contributed extensively within the field of neuroscience with over 125 publications, of which more than 120 focus on cognitive neuroscience. Additional research interests extend to clinical psychology, general decision sciences, developmental and educational psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Main topics of their work are:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Best Publications

  • Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams

    Rotem Botvinik-Nezer;Rotem Botvinik-Nezer;Felix Holzmeister;Colin F. Camerer;Anna Dreber;Anna Dreber

  • Post-error slowing: an orienting account.

    Wim Notebaert;Femke Houtman;Filip Van Opstal;Wim Gevers

  • Representation of Number in Animals and Humans: A Neural Model

    Tom Verguts;Wim Fias

  • Adaptation by binding: a learning account of cognitive control.

    Tom Verguts;Wim Notebaert

  • Hebbian Learning of Cognitive Control : Dealing With Specific and Nonspecific Adaptation

    Tom Verguts;Wim Notebaert

  • Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect.

    Wim Gevers;Tom Verguts;Bert Reynvoet;Bernie Caessens

  • A model of exact small-number representation.

    Tom Verguts;Wim Fias;Michaël Stevens

  • Grounding cognitive control in associative learning.

    Elger Abrahamse;Senne Braem;Wim Notebaert;Tom Verguts

  • Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect

    Wim Gevers;Jan Lammertyn;Wim Notebaert;Tom Verguts

  • Dissecting the symbolic distance effect: comparison and priming effects in numerical and nonnumerical orders.

    Filip Van Opstal;Wim Gevers;Wendy De Moor;Tom Verguts

  • Overlapping Neural Systems Represent Cognitive Effort and Reward Anticipation

    Eliana Vassena;Massimo Silvetti;Carsten N. Boehler;Eric Achten

  • Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions.

    Wim Gevers;Seppe Santens;Elisah Dhooge;Qi Chen

  • Cognitive control acts locally.

    Wim Notebaert;Tom Verguts

  • Reward Modulates Adaptations to Conflict.

    Senne Braem;Tom Verguts;Chantal Roggeman;Wim Notebaert

  • Number Processing Pathways in Human Parietal Cortex

    Seppe Santens;Chantal Roggeman;Wim Fias;Tom Verguts

  • Interacting neighbors: A connectionist model of retrieval in single-digit multiplication

    Tom Verguts;Wim Fias

  • Value and Prediction Error in Medial Frontal Cortex: Integrating the Single-Unit and Systems Levels of Analysis

    Massimo Silvetti;Massimo Silvetti;Ruth Seurinck;Ruth Seurinck;Tom Verguts;Tom Verguts

  • From conflict management to reward-based decision making: actors and critics in primate medial frontal cortex.

    Massimo Silvetti;William Alexander;Tom Verguts;Joshua W. Brown

  • Adaptive effort investment in cognitive and physical tasks: a neurocomputational model.

    Tom Verguts;Eliana Vassena;Massimo Silvetti

  • Priming reveals differential coding of symbolic and non-symbolic quantities.

    Chantal Roggeman;Tom Verguts;Wim Fias

Frequent Co-Authors

Wim Fias
Wim Fias Ghent University
Wim Notebaert
Wim Notebaert Ghent University
Wim Gevers
Wim Gevers Université Libre de Bruxelles
Paul De Boeck
Paul De Boeck The Ohio State University
Tobias H. Donner
Tobias H. Donner Universität Hamburg
Jean M. Vettel
Jean M. Vettel United States Army Research Laboratory
Bert Reynvoet
Bert Reynvoet KU Leuven
Jean-Baptiste Poline
Jean-Baptiste Poline Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Ruth M. Krebs
Ruth M. Krebs Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA can open pathways to related online degrees and diverse careers, especially in the social work field. Many students interested in psychology also consider social work for its practical impact on communities and individuals.

Affordability is a key concern for many prospective students. If you are looking for affordable social work degrees in Seattle, there are programs designed to keep costs manageable while providing quality education. Similarly, those in Florida can find affordable social work programs in Tallahassee, balancing cost-effectiveness with accredited training.

On a broader scale, learners can compare the cheapest social work programs in USA to find accessible options nationwide. For students in the western region, there are also the cheapest social work programs in Utah, offering budget-friendly education with local relevance.

Choosing a related online degree or career pathway such as social work can provide robust job prospects and the opportunity to make meaningful contributions—all while managing educational expenses.

Best Scientists Citing Tom Verguts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles