World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
87222
World Ranking
8091
National Ranking
793

Marek Malik publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marek Malik sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 701 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Marek Malik D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marek Malik sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marek Malik is a researcher affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily focuses on Medicine, with a significant concentration in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Other areas of their research include Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Pharmacology.

The main topics addressed in Malik's research encompass:

  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

The frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • European Heart Journal
  • Frontiers in Physiology
  • Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
  • Scientific Reports
  • Heart Rhythm

Malik has collaborated extensively with various coauthors. Among the most frequent collaborators are:

  • Katerina Hnatkova
  • Georg Schmidt
  • Tomáš Novotný
  • Irena Andršová
  • Markus Zabel

Recent publications authored or coauthored by Malik include:

  • Clinical effectiveness of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results of the EU-CERT-ICD controlled multicentre cohort study (2020, European Heart Journal)
  • Influence of heart rate correction formulas on QTc interval stability (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • QRS micro-fragmentation as a mortality predictor (2022, European Heart Journal)
  • Physiologic heart rate dependency of the PQ interval and its sex differences (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • Problems with Bazett QTc correction in paediatric screening of prolonged QTc interval (2020, BMC Pediatrics)

Best Publications

  • Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.

    A.J. Camm;M. Malik;J.T. Bigger;G. Breithardt

  • Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use

    Marek Malik;J. Thomas Bigger;A. John Camm;Robert E. Kleiger

  • Heart rate variability: Origins, methods, and interpretive caveats

    Gary G. Berntson;J. Thomas Bigger;Dwain L. Eckberg;Paul Grossman

  • Heart-rate turbulence after ventricular premature beats as a predictor of mortality after acute myocardial infarction

    Georg Schmidt;Marek Malik;Petra Barthel;Raphael Schneider

  • Heart rate variability

    M. Malik;A. J. Camm

  • Risk stratification for arrhythmic events in postinfarction patients based on heart rate variability, ambulatory electrocardiographic variables and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram.

    Thomas G. Farrell;Yaver Bashir;Tim Cripps;Marek Malik

  • Components of heart rate variability--what they really mean and what we really measure

    Marek Malik;A.John Camm

  • Work stress and coronary heart disease: what are the mechanisms?

    Tarani Chandola;Annie Britton;Eric Brunner;Harry Hemingway

  • Deceleration capacity of heart rate as a predictor of mortality after myocardial infarction: cohort study

    Axel Bauer;Jan W Kantelhardt;Petra Barthel;Raphael Schneider

  • Heart Rate Variability.: Standards of Measurement, Physiological Interpretation, and Clinical Use: Task Force of The European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology

    M.D. Marek Malik

  • Measurement, interpretation and clinical potential of QT dispersion

    Marek Malik;Velislav N Batchvarov

  • Advances in heart rate variability signal analysis: joint position statement by the e-Cardiology ESC Working Group and the European Heart Rhythm Association co-endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society

    Roberto Sassi;Sergio Cerutti;Federico Lombardi;Marek Malik

  • The potential for QT prolongation and pro-arrhythmia by non-anti-arrhythmic drugs: clinical and regulatory implications. Report on a Policy Conference of the European Society of Cardiology.

    W. Haverkamp;G. Breithardt;A. J. Camm;M. J. Janse

  • Heart rate turbulence: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use: International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrophysiology Consensus.

    Axel Bauer;Marek Malik;Georg Schmidt;Petra Barthel

  • Relation between QT and RR intervals is highly individual among healthy subjects: implications for heart rate correction of the QT interval

    M Malik;P Färbom;V Batchvarov;K Hnatkova

  • Microvolt T-wave alternans physiological basis, methods of measurement, and clinical utility--consensus guideline by International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology.

    Richard L. Verrier;Thomas Klingenheben;Thomas Klingenheben;Marek Malik;Nabil El-Sherif

  • The potential for QT prolongation and proarrhythmia by non-antiarrhythmic drugs: clinical and regulatory implications. Report on a policy conference of the European Society of Cardiology.

    W Haverkamp;G Breithardt;A J Camm;M J Janse

  • QT dispersion: problems of methodology and clinical significance.

    D J Statters;M Malik;D E Ward;A J Camm

  • Heart rate variability in relation to prognosis after myocardial infarction: selection of optimal processing techniques.

    M. Malik;T. Farrell;T. Cripps;A. J. Camm

  • Heart rate variability.

    Marek Malik

Frequent Co-Authors

A. John Camm
A. John Camm St George's, University of London
Heikki V. Huikuri
Heikki V. Huikuri University of Oulu
William J. McKenna
William J. McKenna University College London
Lars Køber
Lars Køber Copenhagen University Hospital
Georg Schmidt
Georg Schmidt Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Peter J. Schwartz
Peter J. Schwartz Istituto Auxologico Italiano
Perry M. Elliott
Perry M. Elliott University College London
Christian Torp-Pedersen
Christian Torp-Pedersen Aalborg University
Richard L. Verrier
Richard L. Verrier Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Raphaël Schneider
Raphaël Schneider University of Lorraine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or complementary education routes can broaden your options within the healthcare sector. For those seeking advanced clinical roles, there are cheap online DNP programs that offer quality education at affordable rates, enabling career advancement without significant financial burden.

Pharmacy is another rewarding field. With pharmacy school online options now available, students can pursue a doctorate in pharmacy from home, balancing their studies with work or family commitments.

High school students interested in healthcare careers can get a head start by enrolling in programs from the best online schools for high school students, focusing on health information management and related disciplines.

For those interested in administrative roles, it's worth considering how much is medical billing and coding school; many affordable courses exist, equipping students with in-demand skills for entry-level healthcare positions.

Best Scientists Citing Marek Malik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles