World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 100 8090 7604 790 753 701 87222

Marek Malik publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marek Malik between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marek Malik published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 17.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 1998. 21 of the 751 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 1998. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 17 publications 1989: 14 publications 1990: 22 publications 1991: 29 publications 1992: 24 publications 1993: 18 publications 1994: 19 publications 1995: 16 publications 1996: 37 publications 1997: 35 publications 1998: 41 publications 1999: 22 publications 2000: 30 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 33 publications 2003: 31 publications 2004: 31 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 14 publications
1983 2025

751 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marek Malik: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 2
1988 17
1989 14
1990 22
1991 29
1992 24
1993 18
1994 19
1995 16
1996 37
1997 35
1998 41
1999 22
2000 30
2001 16
2002 33
2003 31
2004 31
2005 19
2006 13
2007 12
2008 20
2009 17
2010 10
2011 13
2012 10
2013 12
2014 26
2015 11
2016 16
2017 18
2018 17
2019 26
2020 19
2021 10
2022 7
2023 14
2024 7
2025 14
Total 751
Download as CSV

Marek Malik publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marek Malik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 701–720 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 701 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307 701
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Marek Malik D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marek Malik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611 100
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marek Malik is a researcher affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily focuses on Medicine, with a significant concentration in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Other areas of their research include Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Pharmacology.

The main topics addressed in Malik's research encompass:

  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

The frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • European Heart Journal
  • Frontiers in Physiology
  • Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
  • Scientific Reports
  • Heart Rhythm

Malik has collaborated extensively with various coauthors. Among the most frequent collaborators are:

  • Katerina Hnatkova
  • Georg Schmidt
  • Tomáš Novotný
  • Irena Andršová
  • Markus Zabel

Recent publications authored or coauthored by Malik include:

  • Clinical effectiveness of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results of the EU-CERT-ICD controlled multicentre cohort study (2020, European Heart Journal)
  • Influence of heart rate correction formulas on QTc interval stability (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • QRS micro-fragmentation as a mortality predictor (2022, European Heart Journal)
  • Physiologic heart rate dependency of the PQ interval and its sex differences (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • Problems with Bazett QTc correction in paediatric screening of prolonged QTc interval (2020, BMC Pediatrics)

Best Publications

  • Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.

    A.J. Camm;M. Malik;J.T. Bigger;G. Breithardt

  • Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use

    Marek Malik;J. Thomas Bigger;A. John Camm;Robert E. Kleiger

  • Heart rate variability: Origins, methods, and interpretive caveats

    Gary G. Berntson;J. Thomas Bigger;Dwain L. Eckberg;Paul Grossman

  • Heart-rate turbulence after ventricular premature beats as a predictor of mortality after acute myocardial infarction

    Georg Schmidt;Marek Malik;Petra Barthel;Raphael Schneider

  • Heart rate variability

    M. Malik;A. J. Camm

  • Risk stratification for arrhythmic events in postinfarction patients based on heart rate variability, ambulatory electrocardiographic variables and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram.

    Thomas G. Farrell;Yaver Bashir;Tim Cripps;Marek Malik

  • Components of heart rate variability--what they really mean and what we really measure

    Marek Malik;A.John Camm

  • Work stress and coronary heart disease: what are the mechanisms?

    Tarani Chandola;Annie Britton;Eric Brunner;Harry Hemingway

  • Deceleration capacity of heart rate as a predictor of mortality after myocardial infarction: cohort study

    Axel Bauer;Jan W Kantelhardt;Petra Barthel;Raphael Schneider

  • Heart Rate Variability.: Standards of Measurement, Physiological Interpretation, and Clinical Use: Task Force of The European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology

    M.D. Marek Malik

  • Measurement, interpretation and clinical potential of QT dispersion

    Marek Malik;Velislav N Batchvarov

  • Advances in heart rate variability signal analysis: joint position statement by the e-Cardiology ESC Working Group and the European Heart Rhythm Association co-endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society

    Roberto Sassi;Sergio Cerutti;Federico Lombardi;Marek Malik

  • The potential for QT prolongation and pro-arrhythmia by non-anti-arrhythmic drugs: clinical and regulatory implications. Report on a Policy Conference of the European Society of Cardiology.

    W. Haverkamp;G. Breithardt;A. J. Camm;M. J. Janse

  • Heart rate turbulence: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use: International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrophysiology Consensus.

    Axel Bauer;Marek Malik;Georg Schmidt;Petra Barthel

  • Relation between QT and RR intervals is highly individual among healthy subjects: implications for heart rate correction of the QT interval

    M Malik;P Färbom;V Batchvarov;K Hnatkova

  • Microvolt T-wave alternans physiological basis, methods of measurement, and clinical utility--consensus guideline by International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology.

    Richard L. Verrier;Thomas Klingenheben;Thomas Klingenheben;Marek Malik;Nabil El-Sherif

  • The potential for QT prolongation and proarrhythmia by non-antiarrhythmic drugs: clinical and regulatory implications. Report on a policy conference of the European Society of Cardiology.

    W Haverkamp;G Breithardt;A J Camm;M J Janse

  • QT dispersion: problems of methodology and clinical significance.

    D J Statters;M Malik;D E Ward;A J Camm

  • Heart rate variability in relation to prognosis after myocardial infarction: selection of optimal processing techniques.

    M. Malik;T. Farrell;T. Cripps;A. J. Camm

  • Heart rate variability.

    Marek Malik

Frequent Co-Authors

A. John Camm
A. John Camm St George's, University of London
Heikki V. Huikuri
Heikki V. Huikuri University of Oulu
William J. McKenna
William J. McKenna University College London
Lars Køber
Lars Køber Copenhagen University Hospital
Georg Schmidt
Georg Schmidt Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Peter J. Schwartz
Peter J. Schwartz Istituto Auxologico Italiano
Perry M. Elliott
Perry M. Elliott University College London
Christian Torp-Pedersen
Christian Torp-Pedersen Aalborg University
Richard L. Verrier
Richard L. Verrier Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Raphaël Schneider
Raphaël Schneider University of Lorraine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or complementary education routes can broaden your options within the healthcare sector. For those seeking advanced clinical roles, there are cheap online DNP programs that offer quality education at affordable rates, enabling career advancement without significant financial burden.

Pharmacy is another rewarding field. With pharmacy school online options now available, students can pursue a doctorate in pharmacy from home, balancing their studies with work or family commitments.

High school students interested in healthcare careers can get a head start by enrolling in programs from the best online schools for high school students, focusing on health information management and related disciplines.

For those interested in administrative roles, it's worth considering how much is medical billing and coding school; many affordable courses exist, equipping students with in-demand skills for entry-level healthcare positions.

Best Scientists Citing Marek Malik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles