World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
68
Citations
15701
World Ranking
2762
National Ranking
92

Marc Sindou publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Sindou sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 434 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Marc Sindou D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Sindou sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Electrical stimulation of motor cortex for pain control: a combined PET-scan and electrophysiological study☆

    L Garcı́a-Larrea;R Peyron;P Mertens;M.C Gregoire

  • Clinical manifestations of insular lobe seizures: a stereo-electroencephalographic study.

    Jean Isnard;Marc Guénot;Marc Sindou;François Mauguière

  • Trigeminal neuralgia New classification and diagnostic grading for practice and research

    Giorgio Cruccu;Nanna B. Finnerup;Troels S. Jensen;Joachim Scholz

  • The role of the insular cortex in temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Jean Isnard;Marc Guénot;Karine Ostrowsky;Marc Sindou

  • Anatomical Observations During Microvascular Decompression for Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia (with Correlations Between Topography of Pain and Site of the Neurovascular Conflict). Prospective Study in a Series of 579 Patients

    M Sindou;T Howeidy;G Acevedo

  • Microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia: long-term effectiveness and prognostic factors in a series of 362 consecutive patients with clear-cut neurovascular conflicts who underwent pure decompression

    Marc Sindou;José Leston;Evelyne Decullier;François Chapuis

  • Various surgical modalities for trigeminal neuralgia: literature study of respective long-term outcomes.

    M Tatli;O Satici;Y Kanpolat;M Sindou

  • Electrical stimulation of precentral cortical area in the treatment of central pain: electrophysiological and PET study

    R. Peyron;L. Garcia-Larrea;M. P. Deiber;L. Cinotti

  • Motor cortex stimulation for pain control induces changes in the endogenous opioid system.

    J. Maarrawi;R. Peyron;P. Mertens;N. Costes

  • Subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease: clinical evaluation of 18 patients.

    S Thobois;P Mertens;M Guenot;M Hermier

  • Motor cortex stimulation for refractory neuropathic pain: four year outcome and predictors of efficacy.

    Christophe Nuti;Roland Peyron;Luis Garcia-Larrea;Jacques Brunon

  • Neurophysiological Monitoring for Epilepsy Surgery: The Talairach SEEG Method

    Marc Guenot;Jean Isnard;Philippe Ryvlin;Catherine Fischer

  • Results of attempted radical tumor removal and venous repair in 100 consecutive meningiomas involving the major dural sinuses.

    Marc P Sindou;Jorge E Alvernia

  • Role of operculoinsular cortices in human pain processing: converging evidence from PET, fMRI, dipole modeling, and intracerebral recordings of evoked potentials.

    Roland Peyron;M. Frot;F. Schneider;Luis Garcia-Larrea

  • Micro-vascular decompression for primary Trigeminal Neuralgia (typical or atypical). Long-term effectiveness on pain; prospective study with survival analysis in a consecutive series of 362 patients.

    M. Sindou;J. Leston;T. Howeidy;E. Decullier

  • SEEG-guided RF thermocoagulation of epileptic foci: feasibility, safety, and preliminary results.

    Marc Guénot;Jean Isnard;Philippe Ryvlin;Catherine Fischer

  • Preoperative demonstration of the neurovascular compression characteristics with special emphasis on the degree of compression, using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study, with comparison to surgical findings, in 100 consecutive patients who underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia

    Paulo Roberto Lacerda Leal;Marc Hermier;Jean Claude Froment;Miguel Angelo Souza

  • Aneurysmal remnants after microsurgical clipping: classification and results from a prospective angiographic study (in a consecutive series of 305 operated intracranial aneurysms).

    M Sindou;J C Acevedo;F Turjman

  • Brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential changes and warning values to prevent hearing loss--prospective study in a consecutive series of 84 patients.

    Gustavo Polo;Catherine Fischer;Marc P. Sindou;Vincent Marneffe

  • Differential brain opioid receptor availability in central and peripheral neuropathic pain.

    Joseph Maarrawi;Roland Peyron;Patrick Mertens;Patrick Mertens;Patrick Mertens;Nicolas Costes

  • Microsurgical lesioning in the dorsal root entry zone for pain due to brachial plexus avulsion: a prospective series of 55 patients

    Marc P Sindou;Eric Blondet;Evelyne Emery;Patrick Mertens

  • Microvascular decompression for primary hemifacial spasm. Importance of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

    M. P. Sindou

  • Prognostic factors in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia.

    Jacek Szapiro;Marc Sindou;Jerzy Szapiro

  • Microsurgical DREZotomy for pain due to spinal cord and/or cauda equina injuries: long-term results in a series of 44 patients.

    M. Sindou;P. Mertens;M. Wael

  • Positron emission tomography during motor cortex stimulation for pain control.

    L.G. Garcia-Larrea;R. Peyron;P. Mertens;M.C. Grégoire

Frequent Co-Authors

François Mauguière
François Mauguière Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Marc Guénot
Marc Guénot Hôpital Édouard-Herriot
Luis Garcia-Larrea
Luis Garcia-Larrea Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Bernard Laurent
Bernard Laurent Grenoble Alpes University
Roland Peyron
Roland Peyron Jean Monnet University
Philippe Ryvlin
Philippe Ryvlin University Hospital of Lausanne
Jean Isnard
Jean Isnard Hospices Civils de Lyon
Catherine Fischer
Catherine Fischer Hospices Civils de Lyon
Patrick J. Kelly
Patrick J. Kelly New York University
Peter McL. Black
Peter McL. Black University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Neuroscience, exploring related degrees online can significantly expand your options. Earning an online bachelor's degree allows you to study at your own pace while developing a strong foundation in science. These programs often offer flexibility for working adults or those balancing multiple commitments.

Neuroscience graduates may find their expertise aligns with some of the highest paid degrees in the healthcare and biomedical fields. In fact, several neuroscience-related careers are listed among the most lucrative degrees, especially those leading to clinical or research roles.

Affordability is another major consideration. Many online colleges that accept fafsa help ease the financial burden, making it easier for students to access high-quality programs. Whether you aim for research, healthcare, or technology, starting your journey online can be both practical and cost-effective.

Best Scientists Citing Marc Sindou

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles