World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 35 6664 6194 3233 2950 105 6857

Megan Bang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Megan Bang between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Megan Bang published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2014. 8 of the 121 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2014. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 6 publications
2006 2025

121 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Megan Bang: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 2
2008 2
2009 2
2010 3
2011 0
2012 7
2013 6
2014 26
2015 7
2016 6
2017 4
2018 12
2019 6
2020 7
2021 7
2022 5
2023 10
2024 2
2025 6
Total 121
Download as CSV

Megan Bang publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Megan Bang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 104–113 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 105 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406 105
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Megan Bang D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Megan Bang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243 35
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Megan Bang is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research primarily belongs to the field of Social Sciences, with a significant focus on Education. Subfields of interest include Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

The research topics Bang engages with cover several areas: Indigenous and Place-Based Education, Environmental Education and Sustainability, Diverse Educational Innovations Studies, Science Education and Pedagogy, Cultural Differences and Values, Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights, as well as Animal and Plant Science Education.

Bang has contributed to various publication venues, including Proceedings., Occasional Paper Series, Journal of Family Diversity in Education, Cognition and Instruction, and Connected Science Learning.

Frequent collaborators in Bang's work include Carrie Tzou, Anna Lees, Veronica Cassone McGowan, Jordan Sherry-Wagner, and Ananda Marin.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Bang are:

  • Learning on the Move Toward Just, Sustainable, and Culturally Thriving Futures, 2020, Cognition and Instruction
  • Undoing human supremacy and white supremacy to transform relationships: An interview with Megan Bang and Ananda Marin, 2022, Curriculum Inquiry

Bang's scholarship also extends to book publications. One noted book, published by eBooks in 2021, is titled:.

Best Publications

  • Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies

    Megan Bang;Douglas L Medin

  • Participatory Design Research and Educational Justice: Studying Learning and Relations Within Social Change Making

    Megan Bang;Shirin Vossoughi

  • Desettling Expectations in Science Education

    Megan Bang;Beth Warren;Ann S. Rosebery;Douglas Medin

  • Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature.

    Megan Bang;Douglas L. Medin;Scott Atran;Scott Atran;Scott Atran

  • Muskrat theories, tobacco in the streets, and living Chicago as Indigenous land

    Megan Bang;Lawrence Curley;Adam Kessel;Ananda Marin

  • Who's Asking?: Native Science, Western Science, and Science Education

    Douglas L. Medin;Megan Bang;Megan Bang

  • Nature–culture constructs in science learning: Human/non-human agency and intentionality

    Megan Bang;Ananda Marin

  • Community-Based Design Research: Learning Across Generations and Strategic Transformations of Institutional Relations Toward Axiological Innovations

    Megan Bang;Lori Faber;Jasmine Gurneau;Ananda Marin

  • Designing Indigenous language revitalization

    Mary R Hermes;Megan Bang;Ananda Marin

  • “Look It, This is how You Know:” Family Forest Walks as a Context for Knowledge-Building About the Natural World

    Ananda Marin;Megan Bang

  • Articulating the “How,” the “For What,” the “For Whom,” and the “With Whom” in Concert: A Call to Broaden the Benchmarks of our Scholarship

    Thomas M. Philip;Megan Bang;Kara Jackson

  • Innovations in Culturally Based Science Education Through Partnerships and Community

    Megan Bang;Douglas L Medin;Karen Washinawatok;Shannon Chapman

  • Indigenous Making and Sharing: Claywork in an Indigenous STEAM Program

    Filiberto Barajas-López;Megan Bang

  • The cultural side of science communication

    Douglas L. Medin;Megan Bang

  • Multiple Ways of Knowing * : Re-Imagining Disciplinary Learning

    Beth Warren;Shirin Vossoughi;Ann S. Rosebery;Megan Bang

  • Systems of (non-)diversity

    Douglas Medin;Bethany Ojalehto;Ananda Marin;Megan Bang

  • Culture, Learning, and Development and the Natural World: The Influences of Situative Perspectives

    Megan Bang

  • Culturally relevant schooling in science indigenous: Stressing the all in science literacy for all

    Eleanor Abrams;Larry D. Yore;Megan Bang;Bryan Mc Kinley Jones Brayboy

  • The Learning Sciences in a New Era of U.S. Nationalism

    Thomas M. Philip;A. Susan Jurow;Shirin Vossoughi;Megan Bang

  • If Indigenous Peoples Stand with the Sciences, Will Scientists Stand with Us?

    Megan Bang;Ananda Marin;Douglas Medin

  • Cultural differences in children's ecological reasoning and psychological closeness to nature: Evidence from menominee and european American children

    Sara J. Unsworth;Wallis Levin;Megan Bang;Karen Washinawatok

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas L. Medin
Douglas L. Medin Northwestern University
Sandra R. Waxman
Sandra R. Waxman Northwestern University
Larry D. Yore
Larry D. Yore University of Victoria
Scott Atran
Scott Atran University of Oxford
Brigid Barron
Brigid Barron Vanderbilt University
William R. Penuel
William R. Penuel University of Colorado Boulder
Kris D. Gutiérrez
Kris D. Gutiérrez University of California, Berkeley
Yasmin B. Kafai
Yasmin B. Kafai University of Pennsylvania
Michael Cole
Michael Cole University of East London
Linda Darling-Hammond
Linda Darling-Hammond Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online degrees and rewarding career opportunities. One option for those interested in advanced clinical practice is enrolling in online psyd programs, which prepare graduates for professional roles in psychology and mental health settings.

For prospective therapists, there are also flexible options through mft online programs that focus on marriage and family therapy. These programs often offer accelerated formats for those eager to begin their counseling careers quickly.

Tuition is a major factor when choosing a degree. Curious about affordability? Learn more about how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology and discover programs that balance cost with quality education.

If your interests lean toward the academic or administrative side of education, consider edd online programs for fast-track pathways to leadership positions in schools, colleges, or policy organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Megan Bang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles