What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Acoustics
- Statistics
- Hearing loss
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Acoustics, Audiology, Cochlea, Otoacoustic emission and Distortion product.
His Acoustics research incorporates elements of Finite impulse response and Sensation.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Amplitude, Interpeak latency, Electrophysiology and Vigilance.
His work in Cochlea addresses subjects such as Tone burst, which are connected to disciplines such as Ear canal, Intensity and Auditory system.
His Otoacoustic emission study improves the overall literature in Hearing loss.
His work investigates the relationship between Distortion product and topics such as Stimulus that intersect with problems in Basilar membrane.
His most cited work include:
- A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics (313 citations)
- Invertibility of a room impulse response (311 citations)
- An active cochlear model showing sharp tuning and high sensitivity (273 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Stephen T. Neely mostly deals with Acoustics, Otoacoustic emission, Audiology, Distortion product and Hearing loss.
The Acoustics study combines topics in areas such as Stimulus, Cochlea and Calibration.
In general Cochlea, his work in Basilar membrane, Hair cell and Outer hair cells is often linked to Sensitivity linking many areas of study.
His work deals with themes such as Test performance, Audiometry, Amplitude, Perceptual Distortion and Octave, which intersect with Otoacoustic emission.
His study looks at the intersection of Audiology and topics like Masking with Tone and Psychoacoustics.
In his research, Noise and Speech recognition is intimately related to Loudness, which falls under the overarching field of Hearing loss.
He most often published in these fields:
- Acoustics (67.53%)
- Otoacoustic emission (37.66%)
- Audiology (37.01%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?
- Acoustics (67.53%)
- Audiology (37.01%)
- Hearing loss (19.48%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Stephen T. Neely mostly deals with Acoustics, Audiology, Hearing loss, Loudness and Reflectivity.
The various areas that Stephen T. Neely examines in his Acoustics study include Stimulus and Otoacoustic emission.
His Otoacoustic emission research integrates issues from Audiometry, Standard error, Distortion product and Linear model.
His studies deal with areas such as Applied psychology and Elementary cognitive task as well as Audiology.
His Hearing loss study incorporates themes from Speech perception, Noise and Hearing impaired.
His Loudness research includes themes of Speech recognition, Intensity, Statistics, Categorical variable and Tone.
Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels (44 citations)
- Consensus statement: Eriksholm workshop on wideband absorbance measures of the middle ear (31 citations)
- Latency of tone-burst-evoked auditory brain stem responses and otoacoustic emissions: level, frequency, and rise-time effects. (25 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Acoustics
- Statistics
- Hearing loss
His primary areas of investigation include Acoustics, Audiology, Sound pressure, Otoacoustic emission and Stimulus.
His work in the fields of Acoustics, such as Ear canal, overlaps with other areas such as Acoustic impedance.
Stephen T. Neely studies Audiology, focusing on Hearing loss in particular.
Stephen T. Neely has researched Hearing loss in several fields, including Cochlea, Loudness and Hearing impaired.
Otoacoustic emission is closely attributed to Auditory brain stem response in his work.
As a part of the same scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Stimulus, focusing on Tone burst and, on occasion, Auditory brainstem response, Sensation, Cochlear mechanics and Electroencephalography.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
