World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Elbert A.J. Joosten

Elbert A.J. Joosten

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 55 4704 4327 142 133 203 11152

Elbert A.J. Joosten publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elbert A.J. Joosten between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elbert A.J. Joosten published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2010. 14 of the 235 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2010. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 6 publications
1987 2025

235 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elbert A.J. Joosten: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 3
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 2
1995 0
1996 3
1997 1
1998 5
1999 7
2000 5
2001 3
2002 0
2003 0
2004 4
2005 5
2006 14
2007 10
2008 3
2009 10
2010 21
2011 11
2012 8
2013 7
2014 9
2015 8
2016 5
2017 10
2018 12
2019 8
2020 16
2021 13
2022 8
2023 7
2024 8
2025 6
Total 235
Download as CSV

Elbert A.J. Joosten publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elbert A.J. Joosten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 198–207 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 203 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306 203
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Elbert A.J. Joosten D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elbert A.J. Joosten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392 55
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Elbert A.J. Joosten is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with particular focus on subfields such as Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, and Physiology.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments

Joosten's recent publication record features the paper titled "Biomolecular therapies for chronic discogenic low back pain: A narrative review", published in 2024 in the journal JOR Spine. This paper is associated with research into pain mechanisms and therapeutic approaches for low back pain, a subject relevant to their main topics.

The primary publication venue they have contributed to is:

  • JOR Spine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Joosten include:

  • Imke Rudnik-Jansen
  • Sanda Kodele
  • Laura B. Creemers

Through these collaborations and their works, Joosten engages deeply with research on musculoskeletal pain, spine pathology, and related treatments. Their contributions lie broadly at the intersection of medicine, physiology, and pharmacology, addressing mechanisms underlying pain and potential therapeutic strategies.

Best Publications

  • Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Marieke H.J. van den Beuken-van Everdingen;Laura M.J. Hochstenbach;Elbert A.J. Joosten;Vivianne C.G. Tjan-Heijnen

  • Repairing injured peripheral nerves: Bridging the gap

    Ronald Deumens;Ahmet Bozkurt;Marcel F Meek;Marco A E Marcus;Marco A E Marcus

  • CatWalk-Assisted Gait Analysis in the Assessment of Spinal Cord Injury

    Frank P T Hamers;Guido C Koopmans;Elbert A J Joosten

  • Pulsed and continuous radiofrequency current adjacent to the cervical dorsal root ganglion of the rat induces late cellular activity in the dorsal horn

    Jan Van Zundert;Anton J. A. de Louw;Elbert A. J. Joosten;Alfons G. H. Kessels

  • Spinal Cord Stimulation and Pain Relief in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Prospective Two-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

    Rachel Slangen;Nicolaas C Schaper;Catharina G Faber;Elbert A. J. Joosten

  • The assessment of locomotor function in spinal cord injured rats: the importance of objective analysis of coordination.

    Guido C Koopmans;Ronald Deumens;Wiel M M Honig;Frank P T Hamers

  • CatWalk gait analysis in assessment of functional recovery after sciatic nerve injury

    Ahmet Bozkurt;Ronald Deumens;Ronald Deumens;J. Scheffel;Dan mon O'Dey

  • The CatWalk gait analysis in assessment of both dynamic and static gait changes after adult rat sciatic nerve resection.

    Ronald Deumens;Robby J P Jaken;Robby J P Jaken;Robby J P Jaken;Marco A E Marcus;Marco A E Marcus;Elbert A J Joosten;Elbert A J Joosten

  • Pain prevalence and its determinants after spinal cord injury: A systematic review

    S. van Gorp;A.G. Kessels;E.A. Joosten;M. van Kleef

  • Regeneration of descending axon tracts after spinal cord injury.

    Ronald Deumens;Guido C Koopmans;Elbert A J Joosten

  • The CatWalk method: a detailed analysis of behavioral changes after acute inflammatory pain in the rat.

    A.F. Gabriel;M.A.E. Marcus;W.M.M. Honig;G.H.I.M. Walenkamp

  • Effects of Macrophage Transplantation in the Injured Adult Rat Spinal Cord: A Combined Immunocytochemical and Biochemical Study

    Rachelle Franzen;Jean Schoenen;Pierre Leprince;Elbert Joosten

  • Prevalence and Predictive Factors of Chronic Postsurgical Pain and Poor Global Recovery 1 Year After Outpatient Surgery

    Daisy M. N. Hoofwijk;Audrey A. A. Fiddelers;Madelon L. Peters;Björn Stessel

  • Experimental spinal cord stimulation and neuropathic pain: mechanism of action, technical aspects, and effectiveness

    Helwin Smits;Maarten van Kleef;Jan Holsheimer;Elbert A. J. Joosten

  • Amelioration of motor/sensory dysfunction and spasticity in a rat model of acute lumbar spinal cord injury by human neural stem cell transplantation

    Sebastiaan van Gorp;Sebastiaan van Gorp;Marjolein Leerink;Osamu Kakinohana;Oleksandr Platoshyn

  • GRK2: A Novel Cell-Specific Regulator of Severity and Duration of Inflammatory Pain

    Niels Eijkelkamp;Cobi Jacoba Johanna Heijnen;Hanneke L.D.M. Willemen;Ronald Deumens

  • Collagen containing neonatal astrocytes stimulates regrowth of injured fibers and promotes modest locomotor recovery after spinal cord injury.

    E.A.J. Joosten;E.A.J. Joosten;W.B. Veldhuis;F.P.T. Hamers

  • Pulsed radiofrequency: a review of the basic science as applied to the pathophysiology of radicular pain: a call for clinical translation.

    Koen Van Boxem;Marc Huntoon;Jan Van Zundert;Jacob Patijn

  • Spinal cord stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain: mechanisms of action, new locations, new paradigms

    Elbert A. Joosten;Glenn Franken

  • Alignment of glial cells stimulates directional neurite growth of CNS neurons in vitro.

    R. Deumens;G. C. Koopmans;C. G. J. Den Bakker;V. Maquet

  • Severity of Neuropathy Is Associated With Long-term Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcome in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Five-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Two-Center Clinical Trial

    Maarten van Beek;José W. Geurts;Rachel Slangen;Nicolaas C. Schaper

  • Cellular and molecular insights into neuropathy-induced pain hypersensitivity for mechanism-based treatment approaches

    Julie V. Berger;Liesbeth Knaepen;Sofie P.M. Janssen;Robby J.P. Jaken

  • Differential GABAergic disinhibition during the development of painful peripheral neuropathy

    S.P. Janssen;M. Truin;M. Van Kleef;E.A. Joosten

  • Circulating insulin-like growth factor I and functional recovery from spinal cord injury under enriched housing conditions.

    Guido C. Koopmans;Guido C. Koopmans;Maike Brans;Fernando Gómez-Pinilla;Simone Duis

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald Deumens
Ronald Deumens Université Catholique de Louvain
Dick Tibboel
Dick Tibboel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Bengt Linderoth
Bengt Linderoth Karolinska Institute
Harry W.M. Steinbusch
Harry W.M. Steinbusch Maastricht University
Nicolaas C. Schaper
Nicolaas C. Schaper Maastricht University
Bart P. F. Rutten
Bart P. F. Rutten Maastricht University Medical Centre
Gunter Kenis
Gunter Kenis Maastricht University
Jodi L. Pawluski
Jodi L. Pawluski University of Rennes
Madelon L. Peters
Madelon L. Peters Maastricht University
John Wood
John Wood University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying neuroscience in the USA, there are several related online degrees and rewarding career pathways that might be a good fit. Many students pursue accelerated or affordable programs in fields like psychology, mental health counseling, or social work to broaden their opportunities.

For example, those looking for a fast path to a career in social work may explore 1 year msw programs online. If your focus is more on the science of behavior, an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree can help you start working in research or clinical settings faster.

If mental health support is your passion, consider the most affordable online masters in mental health counseling, or look at options for the cheapest mental health counseling degree. These degrees prepare you for licensure and help you build practical skills for counseling careers.

Exploring these online degrees can expand your knowledge base, improve your job prospects, and open doors to a variety of neuroscience-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Elbert A.J. Joosten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles